How Does Trump Compel His Detractors to Make Their Avatars in His Image?

AProudLefty said:
Post #12.
Click to expand...

Nope, you're doing your 3 year old dance and flat out lying again.

Link to the post where you publicly said Obama should be investigated for war crimes? Post #12 is where you claim to have made the post. I, along with everyone else here suspect no such post exists. You are notorious for claiming things "were posted before."

Act like a grown up, and link to this alleged post, or admit you were once again flat out lying.
 
IBDaMann said:
1. He notices how you are relegated to abandoning reality and to focusing on inconsequential trivia.
2. He vets you by ensuring that you totally believe in "polls" and other fabrications that show how you allow others to do your thinking for you.
3. He trolls you, with the opposite of what he really wants, playing on your incurable TDS which forces you to demand the opposite of what he is trolling, putting great pressure on Trump to concede to exactly what he wants.
4. He amplifies all of the above by amplifying your resolve to continue behaving in exactly the same way as described above, by continuing to win, win, win, win, win, win, win and win again.


... while he wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins and wins ... looking like the fool every time.
Click to expand...
If your ratings are approaching the low thirties you are not “win, win, win, win, winning” at anything, and look like a damn fool saying you are, like arguing the Tennessee Titans are having a good year with their 1-11 record
 
TravisBickle said:
View attachment 66720
Click to expand...
a4a0c0842d38dd23df23aeae33905587.jpg
 
archives said:
If your ratings are approaching the low thirties
Click to expand...
... it means that the DNC is telling "pollsters" what to publish, as though there were actually an underlying poll. The intended audience is the eternally gullible.

If elections were held today, Trump would win in an avalanche. You are gullible.

archives said:
you are not “win, win, win, win, winning” at anything,
Click to expand...
I take it you don't see the independent nature of what one accomplishes and what the DNC has the rabidly Marxist Trump-HATING press write about Trump. You are gullible.
 
AProudLefty said:
Conversely, avatars of Biden or Obama show they're infected. Case in point: @volsrocks
Click to expand...
By the way, just as a side note, you just pulled a "Damocles", i.e. you made the Damocles error. Your statement above was fine, it just wasn't a converse. Instead of writing "Conversely", you should have written "By the same token ..." or "Accordingly ..." or "Similarly ..." etc.
 
IBDaMann said:
By the way, just as a side note, you just pulled a "Damocles", i.e. you made the Damocles error. Your statement above was fine, it just wasn't a converse. Instead of writing "Conversely", you should have written "By the same token ..." or "Accordingly ..." or "Similarly ..." etc.
Click to expand...
Give yourself a pat on your back and a cookie.
 
Uncensored2008 said:
Nope, you're doing your 3 year old dance and flat out lying again.

Link to the post where you publicly said Obama should be investigated for war crimes? Post #12 is where you claim to have made the post. I, along with everyone else here suspect no such post exists. You are notorious for claiming things "were posted before."

Act like a grown up, and link to this alleged post, or admit you were once again flat out lying.
Click to expand...
This here is an example.
AProudLefty said:
Still not comprehending my point. If you think it was wrong of Obama to do that, then you also agree that it was wrong of Hegseth to order the killings of survivors.

Then investigate him for all I care. If he committed war crimes, he should answer for that, just like Bush.
Click to expand...
 
AProudLefty said:
What I do know is that it isn't even original.
Click to expand...
Are you already hitting the crack pipe this early in the morning? What the hell is that supposed to mean? Try responding with a coherent thought or as I have advised several others, maybe consider reading your comment back to yourself before you post it or maybe even decide not to post anything at all if that's the best you can do.
 
Tobytone said:
Are you already hitting the crack pipe this early in the morning? What the hell is that supposed to mean? Try responding with a coherent thought or as I have advised several others, maybe consider reading your comment back to yourself before you post it or maybe even decide not to post anything at all if that's the best you can do.
Click to expand...
Here let me help you.


o·rig·i·nal
/əˈrijən(ə)l,əˈrijn(ə)l/

adjective
  1. 1.​
    present or existing from the beginning; first or earliest.
    "the original owner of the house"
    Similar:
    first
    earliest
    primary
    untouched
    unedited
    uncut
    indigenous
    native
    initial
    aboriginal
    ancient
    primeval
    primordial
    autochthonous
    autochthonic​
    Opposite:
    latest
    last    ​
  2. 2.​
    created directly and personally by a particular artist; not a copy or imitation.
    "original Rembrandts"
 
AProudLefty said:
Here let me help you.


o·rig·i·nal
/əˈrijən(ə)l,əˈrijn(ə)l/

adjective
  1. 1.​
    present or existing from the beginning; first or earliest.
    "the original owner of the house"
    Similar:
    first
    earliest
    primary
    untouched
    unedited
    uncut
    indigenous
    native
    initial
    aboriginal
    ancient
    primeval
    primordial
    autochthonous
    autochthonic​
    Opposite:
    latest
    last    ​
  2. 2.​
    created directly and personally by a particular artist; not a copy or imitation.
    "original Rembrandts"
Click to expand...
Again, it seems like you are so high on crack that you don't realize what you're saying or I'm saying. Unlike you I didn't need to look up the definition of original. Try again but only after you put the pipe down.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top