How many of you actually believe this is the "end times"?

Is the apocalypse nigh?

  • Yes, that's what this war is all about

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • No, that's nonsense

    Votes: 7 77.8%

  • Not until they get the temple rebuilt

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • I have to wait and see what tRump says

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Wonk wonk wonk

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    9
Tobytone said:
I'm going to take a second to recognize improvement when I see it. You didn't end with the typical, 'you are an ass-eater war pig globalist...........'

The only problem now? Your comment is lacking any argument to consider. Hard to argue against 'they'. Those people are behind every problem we've ever had. 'They' are everywhere and both sides love to blame 'they' for every problem. It's much easier than figuring out who 'they' are, isn't it?
Click to expand...
their pronouns are "they".

:truestory:
 
I'm watching people who think they're sane parrot Iran's Foreign Minister. The guy whose regime has waged war on America for decades now whines that it's 'illegal' for us to hit back and end them before they slaughter more innocents. Sums it up.

Libtard simpletons nod along with our enemies as expected, but now a growing right-wing cabal hates Jews just like the left. Tucker, Owen, Kelly, Fuentes, etc. decided getting richer trumps everything, same as libtards. You have new friends, and I'm not sure how many here realize it yet. Right-wing allies on JPP. Enjoy them, they're as irrelevant as you. Sure, they'll hoard cash and maybe snag a Qatar mansion like Tucker, I hear they're real nice to Jew-haters there. The only funny part? Libtards hate for free, Republicans sell their hate. Wish I could say I'm proud.
 
I voted "yes", but I don't believe "that's what this war is all about".

I believe that the so-called "end times" have been present for roughly 2,000 years (following the work of Jesus Christ, namely his perfect life, death, resurrection, and ascension).
 
Last edited:
Crepitus said:
Is it? Some of the military leaders seem to think so.

Personally I think it's total bunk.
Click to expand...
Let's assume, for a moment, that Iran actually has say, two uranium based nuclear bombs. These would have to be in the single digit kiloton range to maybe a Hiroshima sized weapon. That means the most they could do if they used both was maybe trash a smaller to mid-sized city in the Middle East or possibly Europe--assuming they had some missile that could reach.

Firing one against Israel or a target with air defenses would likely see the missile shot down prior to arriving on target. That means if the bomb is still intact and still does go off, it's likely going off where's there's little to nothing of value. But it would mean the gloves would come off in retaliation.

Iran loses big time and accomplishes nothing. You need plutonium based thermonuclear weapons to really get people's attention when it comes to nukes and Iran doesn't have anything like that whatsoever.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Let's assume, for a moment, that Iran actually has say, two uranium based nuclear bombs. These would have to be in the single digit kiloton range to maybe a Hiroshima sized weapon. That means the most they could do if they used both was maybe trash a smaller to mid-sized city in the Middle East or possibly Europe--assuming they had some missile that could reach.

Firing one against Israel or a target with air defenses would likely see the missile shot down prior to arriving on target. That means if the bomb is still intact and still does go off, it's likely going off where's there's little to nothing of value. But it would mean the gloves would come off in retaliation.

Iran loses big time and accomplishes nothing. You need plutonium based thermonuclear weapons to really get people's attention when it comes to nukes and Iran doesn't have anything like that whatsoever.
Click to expand...
I believe you may have misunderstood the question in the OP.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top