Hypocrisy out there for all to see

evince said:
Why do you keep pretending I’m not talking about Reagan’s election cheating?
Click to expand...

You're free to talk about events from 40 years ago, evince. Should I bring up Slick Willie's raping of women and sexual abuse to add to this "Hypocrisy" thread? LOL
 
The Republican Party Emerges From Decades of Court Supervision
After being bound by a consent decree for 35 years, the Republican National Committee is now free to continue its “ballot security” campaign.
 
Doc Dutch said:
That's not my understanding. Hadn't the BP processed them and turned them loose in Texas? Hasn't Abbott been offering them free bus rides to Chicago and NYC? What's the problem? Other than Chicago and NYC proving they are hypocrites and that Congress refuses to fix the problem, that is.
Click to expand...

Well, you certainly need a refresher on things because you're fucking wrong again.

The law says that these migrants have to be turned into Border Patrol so their asylum claims can be processed.

By kidnapping people before they had a chance to turn themselves into Border Patrol, Abbott is illegally trafficking people all around the country so they can't be processed in accordance with our immigration laws.

What's supposed to happen is that these people are supposed to turn themselves into BP in order to claim asylum; but Abbott is using his Nazis to intercept them before they have a chance to do that.

So then he puts them on a bus and ships them to wherever, leaving BP unable to process them at all because Abbott isn't keeping track of anything.

He can't even tell you how many people he's kidnapped because he doesn't even know.

And you support that.
 
Thirty-five years after it was first imposed, a judge has lifted a consent decree barring the Republican National Committee from pursuing “ballot security” measures.

In their 1981 lawsuit to stop the RNC from engaging in certain practices at the polls, the Democratic National Committee attested that in a New Jersey gubernatorial election, the RNC had sent sample ballots to communities of color, and then had the names for each ballot returned as undeliverable removed from voter rolls. Democrats also alleged that the RNC hired off-duty cops to patrol majority-minority precincts, wearing “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands. These details were enough to secure a consent decree between the two party organizations and the court in 1982, stopping the GOP from engaging in such voter-intimidation practices.


Except, Democrats alleged, they didn’t stop. The consent decree was updated in 1987 after Republicans created a voter-challenge list of black voters from whom letters had been returned as undeliverable, with an RNC official saying that the list could “keep the black vote down considerably.” The decree was modified again in 1990 after a court ruled the RNC had violated it by not telling state parties about its provisions, which had led to the North Carolina GOP sending 150,000 postcards to potential voters listing voting regulations, in an apparent attempt at intimidation. The GOP violated the court order again in 2004 after yet another voter-challenge list targeted black voters.
 
LV426 said:
The thing you are supporting ISN'T A LAW.

In fact, it interferes in the enforcement of immigration law because Abbott is kidnapping people so they can't turn themselves into Border Patrol in accordance with our immigration laws.

The major problem is that you don't know what our immigration laws are.

You don't know any of this.

You have no idea.

You don't even know where these laws start.

So since you don't know the law at all, how can you pretend you support enforcing them?????
Click to expand...

If Abbott is breaking the law, why hasn't he been arrested as a criminal?

Are you sure you're not ODing on Red Bull?

d84a834ae33c3e816e6017cfcb2bc0c1.jpg
 
Doc Dutch said:
Hadn't the BP processed them and turned them loose in Texas?
Click to expand...

NO!

This is exactly what I mean when I say you have no fucking idea what you're talking about.

If someone claims asylum status, more often than not they are detained until their court date. They are only released ahead of their court date if they aren't on the terror watch list and have a SPONSOR who can vouch for them and their presence.

These are our immigration laws that you don't seem to know.

Abbott kidnapping and trafficking people directly interferes with that legal process I just mentioned.

So you aren't for enforcing immigration laws, you are for VIOLATING them.
 
evince said:
Thirty-five years after it was first imposed, a judge has lifted a consent decree barring the Republican National Committee from pursuing “ballot security” measures.

In their 1981 lawsuit to stop the RNC from engaging in certain practices at the polls, the Democratic National Committee attested that in a New Jersey gubernatorial election, the RNC had sent sample ballots to communities of color, and then had the names for each ballot returned as undeliverable removed from voter rolls. Democrats also alleged that the RNC hired off-duty cops to patrol majority-minority precincts, wearing “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands. These details were enough to secure a consent decree between the two party organizations and the court in 1982, stopping the GOP from engaging in such voter-intimidation practices.


Except, Democrats alleged, they didn’t stop. The consent decree was updated in 1987 after Republicans created a voter-challenge list of black voters from whom letters had been returned as undeliverable, with an RNC official saying that the list could “keep the black vote down considerably.” The decree was modified again in 1990 after a court ruled the RNC had violated it by not telling state parties about its provisions, which had led to the North Carolina GOP sending 150,000 postcards to potential voters listing voting regulations, in an apparent attempt at intimidation. The GOP violated the court order again in 2004 after yet another voter-challenge list targeted black voters.
Click to expand...

I support killing all terrorists, hanging all traitors and convicting all criminals regardless of party affiliation. Round'em all up. I'm good with it. :thup:
 
Doc Dutch said:
Yes, unlike you, I'm not a lawyer and am more than happy to let this be resolved in court. Meanwhile, I support the 21st century version of forced busing. Share the wealth!!!
Click to expand...

So it's not even about good policy, like I've said so many times.

Conservatives and bOtHSIDerIsts have nothing they can campaign on. No bills, no policies, no success...nothing.

All they can do is brag about how they violate the law.

When you say you are for enforcement of our immigration laws but that you support Abbots kidnapping and trafficking, then you aren't for enforcing our immigration laws...you are for breaking them.
 
Doc Dutch said:
If Abbott is breaking the law, why hasn't he been arrested as a criminal?
Click to expand...

Because Republicans are never arrested for breaking the law.

So now you're at least understanding that at minimum, Abbott is hindering the enforcement of immigration law by kidnapping people before they can turn themselves into Border Patrol.
 
LV426 said:
So it's not even about good policy, like I've said so many times.

Conservatives and bOtHSIDerIsts have nothing they can campaign on. No bills, no policies, no success...nothing.

All they can do is brag about how they violate the law.

When you say you are for enforcement of our immigration laws but that you support Abbots kidnapping and trafficking, then you aren't for enforcing our immigration laws...you are for breaking them.
Click to expand...

They have fought for a permanent majority all my adult life
 
https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ed-another-tool-for-suppressing-votes/550052/


evince said:
Thirty-five years after it was first imposed, a judge has lifted a consent decree barring the Republican National Committee from pursuing “ballot security” measures.

In their 1981 lawsuit to stop the RNC from engaging in certain practices at the polls, the Democratic National Committee attested that in a New Jersey gubernatorial election, the RNC had sent sample ballots to communities of color, and then had the names for each ballot returned as undeliverable removed from voter rolls. Democrats also alleged that the RNC hired off-duty cops to patrol majority-minority precincts, wearing “National Ballot Security Task Force” armbands. These details were enough to secure a consent decree between the two party organizations and the court in 1982, stopping the GOP from engaging in such voter-intimidation practices.


Except, Democrats alleged, they didn’t stop. The consent decree was updated in 1987 after Republicans created a voter-challenge list of black voters from whom letters had been returned as undeliverable, with an RNC official saying that the list could “keep the black vote down considerably.” The decree was modified again in 1990 after a court ruled the RNC had violated it by not telling state parties about its provisions, which had led to the North Carolina GOP sending 150,000 postcards to potential voters listing voting regulations, in an apparent attempt at intimidation. The GOP violated the court order again in 2004 after yet another voter-challenge list targeted black voters.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top