You’re kidding? Oh man if Damo ended up to be right, I guess I’d have to sleep with him too.
You’re kidding? Oh man if Damo ended up to be right, I guess I’d have to sleep with him too.
<starts looking around, wondering where he went wrong>>>No I think the Clintons are capable of anything bac, I just don’t think they were behind this that’s all.
I was just driving home for lunch when Rush was reading a Blog by the woman who organized all this. The blog was from earlier in this whole contraversy. According to Rush she said that Obama wanted us all to believe that Wright was nothing more than a kindly old uncle that was relegated to the church basement and that Obama didn't know about all Wright's beliefs. Rush then went on to say that in HIS mind, for whatever that is worth, she set this whole press club appearence up to benefit Clinton. He didn't go so far as to say the Clinton's PLANNED it but he did say that it was done for her benefit.
Why would Wright play into something he knew would hurt Obama PLANNED by a Clinton supporter?
OBAMA HAS JUST COMPLETELY AND UNEQUIVACALLY DENOUNCED AND REPUDIATED wRIGHT.
He said Wright is exploting division.
Most excellent move.
I have watched him over and over for the last few days and all I can say my brother is EGO. Ego tends to be one of the biggest blinders that humans possess. And honestly, with Moyers he threw Obama under a car if not a bus by saying that Obama only said what he said in Philadelphia because he is a politician. He infered that Obama was not genuine in his comments but only a politician, which I saw as a way of hopefully keeping Obama from jettisoning Wright completely by before hand saying that Obama does what he does ONLY for political reasons.Why would Wright play into something he knew would hurt Obama PLANNED by a Clinton supporter?
I have watched him over and over for the last few days and all I can say my brother is EGO. Ego tends to be one of the biggest blinders that humans possess. And honestly, with Moyers he threw Obama under a car if not a bus by saying that Obama only said what he said in Philadelphia because he is a politician. He infered that Obama was not genuine in his comments but only a politician, which I saw as a way of hopefully keeping Obama from jettisoning Wright completely by before hand saying that Obama does what he does ONLY for political reasons.
I am uncertain if reverend wright cares at all about sticking his foot in his mouth or how what he says appears, this has been evident with his sermons that have come forth don't you think? So to me, this is NOT a new behavior or arrogance, but one that has existed all along to some degree.You may be right .. but his performance looked as if it was intended to derail Obama.
He didn't just throw Obama under the bus, he threw the black church under the bus. There is much discussion and anger within the black community as we speak and the black talk show call-in lines on full.
Wright was held in far better esteem and his ego was being stroked when this looked like just another unfair attack on Obama. But now the stench of this is causing deeper questions. Wright knows that the black church as well as the entire black estabishment supports Obama and recognizes the significance of this moment.
Wright's ego, stature, and legacy would have been far better served by his STFU.
He's an intelligent man .. he must have known that.
I know my pastor from my youth well enough (my mother still goes to his church) that I could, with confidence, answer about 95% of questions that would be put to him, with a reasonable certainty of accuracy, exactly as he would.how well do you know your pastor?
Obama was gracious enough not to demonize this guy out of respect. Look what it got him?
This is one of the reasons I hate organized religion.
The people at the top always seem to get caught up in the power it gives them.
I know my pastor from my youth well enough (my mother still goes to his church) that I could, with confidence, answer about 95% of questions that would be put to him, with a reasonable certainty of accuracy, exactly as he would.
Because you don't attend a church, nor are a member of one. You don't know "your" pastor, because you don't have one.Oh well that must mean everybody does.
I neither know nor care what my local priest thinks about anything. He is about as influential to me as Sowell.
Because you don't attend a church, nor are a member of one. You don't know "your" pastor, because you don't have one.
There is a very large difference between somebody who just yesterday said that they aren't a member of any church but would attend one if Wright, or somebody like him, were preaching and somebody who regularly attends and is a member of a church.
Because you don't attend a church, nor are a member of one. You don't know "your" pastor, because you don't have one.
There is a very large difference between somebody who just yesterday said that they aren't a member of any church but would attend one if Wright, or somebody like him, were preaching and somebody who regularly attends and is a member of a church.
You don't speak for everyone who attends church. People attend church for a wide variety of reasons, and their relationship w/ their pastor, or lack thereof, is an individual thing.