I Am Sticking With My Instincts

The word you want is 'barely', peasant. I have four children, incidentally. The things you mention are cultural artefacts, normal parts of animals, all sorts, but things which humans can, at a push, do without. I'm putting you on Ignore now - once the subhumans start on their half-witted insults, it is time for sensible people to end the conversation.

Dooooooche

"The things you mention are cultural artefacts"

Emotions and senses are in no way shape or form "cultural artifacts." How when and were we choose to access them is the only component relating to enculturation and even that misaproproation has its limits. Proof by reversal, any mamal can be trained differently also. You're making a non-point prejudiced assertion on a pseudo-intellectual conclusion. Your habitual intellectual laziness is proof point of your inferiority. Away with you. You're dismissed.

Turd licker.
 
Human beings don't have instincts in the sense that animals do - just prejudices and ignorance.

Human beings ARE an animal species, Iolo--homo sapiens, to be specific.

Homo sapiens--excluding the devolved mutant infestation in America--is a species with a large cerebrum portion of the brain.
Animals with larger cerebrums have diminished instincts because they use the cognitive process so frequently instead.

A significantly larger cerebrum is the principle difference between canis lupus familiaris, the domestic dog, and it's origin species, canis lupus, the grey wolf.
The difference is even greater between humans and devolved trumpanzees.
 
Human beings ARE an animal species, Iolo--homo sapiens, to be specific.

Homo sapiens--excluding the devolved mutant infestation in America--is a species with a large cerebrum portion of the brain.
Animals with larger cerebrums have diminished instincts because they use the cognitive process so frequently instead.

A significantly larger cerebrum is the principle difference between canis lupus familiaris, the domestic dog, and it's origin species, canis lupus, the grey wolf.
The difference is even greater between humans and devolved trumpanzees.

You're so far up your subjective ass you should wink out of existance.

When and where theres a chunk of brain, means almost nothing. Even motor skills can be re-routed, see early age hemisphere amputations. Beyond that, i can tell you're a closeted racist bigot.

The only difference between people and the rest of the animal world is our habit of being completely psychotic. Turns out psychosis is therapeutic sometimes. Thats it. Thats all.

We have instincts just as any other animal. The assertion that animals dont have a choice but to be instinctive is as flawed as the distinction between predator and herbivore. Fight or flight, there's always a choice. Tho, even you intransigent thugs dont exhibit that much. but i wont say you didnt have the choice no matter how much you make it look like that.

Turns out the only true herbivore on earth is a koala bear. It is completly specialized and can only eat one plant. Name a common animal and ill show you a citation of it eating meat.

The facts are, zoology is a subjectivist pseudoscience.

You've literally learned to be even more stupid than you were born to be.

Im citing your intransigence as counter claim to your own assertions you're chiefly cognitive.

The inability to introspectivly recognize instinctive behaviour is highly suggestive of instinctive behaviour, fools, and not at all suggestive that you dont have instincts.

What makes you think youre so different? Arrogance is another instinct, i'd hazard to say. Note your inability to recognise it as such.


Consciousness is little more than bias appeasement. When and were it refuses to reach outside of it's pathway is not something you can naturaly detect. Despite all your frivolous counterclaims, you yourselves are a perfect example of human instinctive behaviour and much less this cognitive delusion you tell yourselves as you incessantly repeate rhetoric as facts.

That we can train to misapropriate our instincts to create a delusion as to otherwise, is meaningless. You slime find yourselves as superior in your recitation of verifiably false facts as your chief evidence of superiority. On even your own lips is the newly rhetorical "derangement" argument.

Argumentum ad populum will only lead you off a cliff like a buffalo or a lemming. You have no cares of your point being right or wrong only with the faith you've not been mislead. What proves human instinct better than you. What proves you're doomed better than your fellowship?

You, supirior? Harumf! Followers aren't supirior to anything.

Your pride is a counterpoint to your dignity, not a replacement. They're not synonyms.
 
You're so far up your subjective ass you should wink out of existance.

When and where theres a chunk of brain, means almost nothing. Even motor skills can be re-routed, see early age hemisphere amputations. Beyond that, i can tell you're a closeted racist bigot.

The only difference between people and the rest of the animal world is our habit of being completely psychotic. Turns out psychosis is therapeutic sometimes. Thats it. Thats all.

We have instincts just as any other animal. The assertion that animals dont have a choice but to be instinctive is as flawed as the distinction between predator and herbivore. Fight or flight, there's always a choice. Tho, even you intransigent thugs dont exhibit that much. but i wont say you didnt have the choice no matter how much you make it look like that.

Turns out the only true herbivore on earth is a koala bear. It is completly specialized and can only eat one plant. Name a common animal and ill show you a citation of it eating meat.

The facts are, zoology is a subjectivist pseudoscience.

You've literally learned to be even more stupid than you were born to be.

Im citing your intransigence as counter claim to your own assertions you're chiefly cognitive.

The inability to introspectivly recognize instinctive behaviour is highly suggestive of instinctive behaviour, fools, and not at all suggestive that you dont have instincts.

What makes you think youre so different? Arrogance is another instinct, i'd hazard to say. Note your inability to recognise it as such.


Consciousness is little more than bias appeasement. When and were it refuses to reach outside of it's pathway is not something you can naturaly detect. Despite all your frivolous counterclaims, you yourselves are a perfect example of human instinctive behaviour and much less this cognitive delusion you tell yourselves as you incessantly repeate rhetoric as facts.

That we can train to misapropriate our instincts to create a delusion as to otherwise, is meaningless. You slime find yourselves as superior in your recitation of verifiably false facts as your chief evidence of superiority. On even your own lips is the newly rhetorical "derangement" argument.

Argumentum ad populum will only lead you off a cliff like a buffalo or a lemming. You have no cares of your point being right or wrong only with the faith you've not been mislead. What proves human instinct better than you. What proves you're doomed better than your fellowship?

You, supirior? Harumf! Followers aren't supirior to anything.

Your pride is a counterpoint to your dignity, not a replacement. They're not synonyms.

Got it.
<yawn>
 
The word you want is 'barely', peasant. I have four children, incidentally. The things you mention are cultural artefacts, normal parts of animals, all sorts, but things which humans can, at a push, do without. I'm putting you on Ignore now - once the subhumans start on their half-witted insults, it is time for sensible people to end the conversation.
You're so far up your subjective ass you should wink out of existance.

When and where theres a chunk of brain, means almost nothing. Even motor skills can be re-routed, see early age hemisphere amputations. Beyond that, i can tell you're a closeted racist bigot.

The only difference between people and the rest of the animal world is our habit of being completely psychotic. Turns out psychosis is therapeutic sometimes. Thats it. Thats all.

We have instincts just as any other animal. The assertion that animals dont have a choice but to be instinctive is as flawed as the distinction between predator and herbivore. Fight or flight, there's always a choice. Tho, even you intransigent thugs dont exhibit that much. but i wont say you didnt have the choice no matter how much you make it look like that.

Turns out the only true herbivore on earth is a koala bear. It is completly specialized and can only eat one plant. Name a common animal and ill show you a citation of it eating meat.

The facts are, zoology is a subjectivist pseudoscience.

You've literally learned to be even more stupid than you were born to be.

Im citing your intransigence as counter claim to your own assertions you're chiefly cognitive.

The inability to introspectivly recognize instinctive behaviour is highly suggestive of instinctive behaviour, fools, and not at all suggestive that you dont have instincts.

What makes you think youre so different? Arrogance is another instinct, i'd hazard to say. Note your inability to recognise it as such.


Consciousness is little more than bias appeasement. When and were it refuses to reach outside of it's pathway is not something you can naturaly detect. Despite all your frivolous counterclaims, you yourselves are a perfect example of human instinctive behaviour and much less this cognitive delusion you tell yourselves as you incessantly repeate rhetoric as facts.

That we can train to misapropriate our instincts to create a delusion as to otherwise, is meaningless. You slime find yourselves as superior in your recitation of verifiably false facts as your chief evidence of superiority. On even your own lips is the newly rhetorical "derangement" argument.

Argumentum ad populum will only lead you off a cliff like a buffalo or a lemming. You have no cares of your point being right or wrong only with the faith you've not been mislead. What proves human instinct better than you. What proves you're doomed better than your fellowship?

You, supirior? Harumf! Followers aren't supirior to anything.

Your pride is a counterpoint to your dignity, not a replacement. They're not synonyms.

You're so far up your subjective ass you should wink out of existance.

When and where theres a chunk of brain, means almost nothing. Even motor skills can be re-routed, see early age hemisphere amputations. Beyond that, i can tell you're a closeted racist bigot.

The only difference between people and the rest of the animal world is our habit of being completely psychotic. Turns out psychosis is therapeutic sometimes. Thats it. Thats all.

We have instincts just as any other animal. The assertion that animals dont have a choice but to be instinctive is as flawed as the distinction between predator and herbivore. Fight or flight, there's always a choice. Tho, even you intransigent thugs dont exhibit that much. but i wont say you didnt have the choice no matter how much you make it look like that.

Turns out the only true herbivore on earth is a koala bear. It is completly specialized and can only eat one plant. Name a common animal and ill show you a citation of it eating meat.

The facts are, zoology is a subjectivist pseudoscience.

You've literally learned to be even more stupid than you were born to be.

Im citing your intransigence as counter claim to your own assertions you're chiefly cognitive.

The inability to introspectivly recognize instinctive behaviour is highly suggestive of instinctive behaviour, fools, and not at all suggestive that you dont have instincts.

What makes you think youre so different? Arrogance is another instinct, i'd hazard to say. Note your inability to recognise it as such.


Consciousness is little more than bias appeasement. When and were it refuses to reach outside of it's pathway is not something you can naturaly detect. Despite all your frivolous counterclaims, you yourselves are a perfect example of human instinctive behaviour and much less this cognitive delusion you tell yourselves as you incessantly repeate rhetoric as facts.

That we can train to misapropriate our instincts to create a delusion as to otherwise, is meaningless. You slime find yourselves as superior in your recitation of verifiably false facts as your chief evidence of superiority. On even your own lips is the newly rhetorical "derangement" argument.

Argumentum ad populum will only lead you off a cliff like a buffalo or a lemming. You have no cares of your point being right or wrong only with the faith you've not been mislead. What proves human instinct better than you. What proves you're doomed better than your fellowship?

You, supirior? Harumf! Followers aren't supirior to anything.

Your pride is a counterpoint to your dignity, not a replacement. They're not synonyms.
Got it.
<yawn>

Did you? So you dont feel used right? I suppose he has you blocked also tho. Theist slime can only be trusted to be theist slime. Im sure he wouldnt like you much.
 
Last edited:
Human beings ARE an animal species, Iolo--homo sapiens, to be specific.

Homo sapiens--excluding the devolved mutant infestation in America--is a species with a large cerebrum portion of the brain.
Animals with larger cerebrums have diminished instincts because they use the cognitive process so frequently instead.

A significantly larger cerebrum is the principle difference between canis lupus familiaris, the domestic dog, and it's origin species, canis lupus, the grey wolf.
The difference is even greater between humans and devolved trumpanzees.

I refer you to monks and nuns for the 'sex instinct', for instance. Instincts dominate animals, while humans can overcome their various urges, unless they decide to pretend otherwise.
 
I refer you to monks and nuns for the 'sex instinct', for instance. Instincts dominate animals, while humans can overcome their various urges, unless they decide to pretend otherwise.

Based on films that I've seen, monks and nuns have crazy sex all the time.
Can't speak for the extent of realism portrayed, however.
I'd prefer to think that it's true and be happy for them.
 
As you yourself point out, you never really know what's in your vax. Truth is the same with anything tho. You dont really know what you ate this morning you dont really know what you put in your car this morning etc. The vax could be dangerous but so could not taking it. What good would it do to never offer an easter egg vax? You can always build on a vax later. Maybe this vax could prevent other things diwn the road. Why wouldnt vax people want to save vax people? Maybe just save tgem for later like a desert.... who can guess. Flip a coin, take a chance.

you're an imbecile.
 
Based on films that I've seen, monks and nuns have crazy sex all the time.
Can't speak for the extent of realism portrayed, however.
I'd prefer to think that it's true and be happy for them.

Yes i know you spend a lot of time on kinkfactory.com
 
Last edited:
I refer you to monks and nuns for the 'sex instinct', for instance. Instincts dominate animals, while humans can overcome their various urges, unless they decide to pretend otherwise.

I refer you to eunuchs, homos, and xxy's. None of your citations are the least phenotypical. Your cites and mine are the same people.
 
I refer you to monks and nuns for the 'sex instinct', for instance. Instincts dominate animals, while humans can overcome their various urges, unless they decide to pretend otherwise.

Not so, such are just picking different instincts on same stimulus. Derangment. Your citations are classic examples of misapropriated instinctual drives. As i say, psychosis can be therapeutic. In the case of an ancient hiv outbreak as rome would have had following the development of public baths, repressed and castrated plebs saw much better life expectancies. Being that the true nature of diseases was still unknown, humanity survived it through theist psychosis.
 
Not so, such are just picking different instincts on same stimulus. Derangment. Your citations are classic examples of misapropriated instinctual drives. As i say, psychosis can be therapeutic. In the case of an ancient hiv outbreak as rome would have had following the development of public baths, repressed and castrated plebs saw much better life expectancies. Being that the true nature of diseases was still unknown, humanity survived it through theist psychosis.

no. we really can.

marxists always try try debase humanity. fallen angels are jealous of our proximity to god.
 
Back
Top