I guess on one hand you have to hand it to marxists. They never give up

AI slop? No, Intothenight, that’s just what you call anything that exposes you.
I am not AI slop. You are obviously confused. Guess that happens a lot for someone with no brain, Zombie.
You didn’t reject AI. You rejected being proven wrong.
Attempted proof by void.
The moment facts entered the room,
Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie.
you folded like wet cardboard and hid behind the same two insults you’ve been recycling since the Bush administration.
Random words ignored.
AI isn’t God? Relax. Nobody needs divine power to out‑argue you, basic literacy is enough.
You can't claim literacy when you're illiterate. Go learn English. Go learn for 'proof', 'authoritative', 'reference', 'fallacy', 'logic', and 'insult' mean.
You’re not above the conversation.
You aren't having a conversation. AI slop is not a conversation. You have to have a brain to conduct a conversation, Zombie.
You’re not critiquing technology. You’re just terrified of anything that doesn’t let you move the goalposts.
Random words ignored.

Go learn English.
 
Sounds like Claude (AI), steeped in heavy handed attempts to protect leftist Academia, this AI refuses to see the Marxist influence in post-colonial theory. True, Mamdani doesn't wave a little red book around, but it doesn't change that calling him a 'communist' may be imprecise but it is not crazy given the intellectual lineage and his son's politics.

And "authoritative sources" is a cop out.
It is certainly not imprecise.

Mandani wants government ownership of grocery stores, housing, transportation; all taken from taxpayers by force.
That IS communism. There is nothing else you can call it.

Mandani has also created 'police free zones', where open crime is tolerated. While not communism here, it does serve to support the Democrat agenda of harboring criminal activity and organized crime (which he may very well benefit from!). Not communism, but it is aiding and abetting criminal activity. This too was mentioned by Karl Marx as a way of breaking down institutions to be replaced with socialism (including communism).

Most AI systems (including GoogleAI, ChatGPT, Grok) try to stay neutral of political issues giving some mealy-mouthed response, but the bias against conservatism is there. AI, after all, is just a glorified search program, combined with a Dr Psycho game for an output. It looks like regular speech. It even looks sentient, but it isn't.

AI can be a useful tool, but one must always remember it's almost always wrong about one thing or another You can guide it past some of it's errors, but some errors you can't. The danger of AI is when someone tries to use it as a proof of some kind, or even worse, just cut and paste from it like it was some kind of Holy Oracle.

It is mindless.

It was bad enough when Google was used as a proof or Universal Truth. It's even worse with AI.

To treat AI as some sort of God or Holy Oracle or Proof or Universal Truth is not only a void reference, such a user is in danger of really screwing up their life that way, or even ending it.
 
Last edited:
Void reference fallacy. Buzzword fallacy (authoritative). Argument of the Stone fallacy.

He is a communist, just as you are.

AI doesn't work for your brain, Zombie.
You aren't debating, you're malfunctioning. You can’t define communism. You can’t support your claim. You can’t refute my sources. So you panic, throw fallacy buzzwords like confetti, and ends with Zombie because your script has nothing else in it.

You are not exposing my brain. You are exposing the limits of your own.
 
I am not AI slop. You are obviously confused. Guess that happens a lot for someone with no brain, Zombie.

Attempted proof by void.

Go learn what 'fact' means, Zombie.

Random words ignored.

You can't claim literacy when you're illiterate. Go learn English. Go learn for 'proof', 'authoritative', 'reference', 'fallacy', 'logic', and 'insult' mean.

You aren't having a conversation. AI slop is not a conversation. You have to have a brain to conduct a conversation, Zombie.

Random words ignored.

Go learn English.
You’re not debating, you’re glitching. Every line you post is the same recycled insult, the same misused fallacy name, the same Zombie chant you fall back on when your brain buffer overflows.

You scream void, random words, learn English,because you can’t handle the part where your claim was disproven with actual sources.

You didn’t refute anything. You didn’t correct anything. You didn’t even address anything.

You just panicked, hit copy‑paste on your entire vocabulary, and hoped nobody would notice the loop.

Calling everything AI slop doesn’t make you right. It just makes you predictable.

You’re not exposing anyone’s literacy. You’re exposing the limits of your script.

And the funniest part? You keep yelling learn what fact means at the one person in the thread who actually provided any.

This isn’t a conversation. This is you trying to outrun your own ignorance by typing faster.
 
Sounds like Claude (AI), steeped in heavy handed attempts to protect leftist Academia, this AI refuses to see the Marxist influence in post-colonial theory. True, Mamdani doesn't wave a little red book around, but it doesn't change that calling him a 'communist' may be imprecise but it is not crazy given the intellectual lineage and his son's politics.

And "authoritative sources" is a cop out.
you’re not seeing Marxist influence, you’re just seeing your own bias reflected back at you like a funhouse mirror. You call sources a cop‑out because you don’t have any, and you call Mamdani a communist because you can’t tell the difference between academic theory and whatever political boogeyman you’ve glued together in your head.

You’re not critiquing leftist academia, you’re just mad that reading is still part of the process.
 
you’re not seeing Marxist influence, you’re just seeing your own bias reflected back at you like a funhouse mirror. You call sources a cop‑out because you don’t have any, and you call Mamdani a communist because you can’t tell the difference between academic theory and whatever political boogeyman you’ve glued together in your head.

You’re not critiquing leftist academia, you’re just mad that reading is still part of the process.
And you are using an AI that is famous for leftist protection. :dunno:

The reality is, the man promotes government ownership of businesses, trying to say that you cannot point to Marxism after listening to him push that is preposterous.
 
you’re not seeing Marxist influence, you’re just seeing your own bias reflected back at you like a funhouse mirror. You call sources a cop‑out because you don’t have any, and you call Mamdani a communist because you can’t tell the difference between academic theory and whatever political boogeyman you’ve glued together in your head.

You’re not critiquing leftist academia, you’re just mad that reading is still part of the process.
I have to laugh at Damo. His thinking that A.I. has a slant is cute, really. A.I. is incapable of having biases, unlike Damo. It literally just lays out facts. If A.I. is slanted left, then reality must have a leftist slant.
 
Marx and Engels argued that capitalism would wind up with the super-rich and unhappy poor masses. Seems they predicted today's America pretty well. They further said it would result in the poor masses taking action against the upper class. Our wealth gap is worse than the Gilded Age, at a new level of separation.
It is less political than a reflection of greed and selfishness in a group of people.
How does a system that creates an elite selfish upperclass that prospers from the profits the workers create differ from kings and queens living in castles with all the power they can get, living off the labor of serfs?
 
That right there is a lie.
lol. Claude is absolutely famous for this. It ignores things like the basis from which post-colonial theory came and pretends that the ideas from which it sprang cannot possibly be part of what it is today.

If you are a leftist that cannot argue and want something that sounds intelligent to copy/paste you use Claude, as it will aid you in your spread of propaganda while saying it in terms that makes you think it is justified.
 
lol. Claude is absolutely famous for this. It ignores things like the basis from which post-colonial theory came and pretends that the ideas from which it sprang cannot possibly be part of what it is today.

If you are a leftist that cannot argue and want something that sounds intelligent to copy/paste you use Claude, as it will aid you in your spread of propaganda while saying it in terms that makes you think it is justified.
Fake news.
 
lol. Claude is absolutely famous for this. It ignores things like the basis from which post-colonial theory came and pretends that the ideas from which it sprang cannot possibly be part of what it is today.

If you are a leftist that cannot argue and want something that sounds intelligent to copy/paste you use Claude, as it will aid you in your spread of propaganda while saying it in terms that makes you think it is justified.
calling everything propaganda isn’t analysis, it’s the panic button you slam when facts start chewing through your ankles.

You didn’t refute a single point. You didn’t touch the evidence. You just screamed Claude bad! like a man trying to fight a smoke alarm with a broom.

That’s not wit. That’s not theory. That’s you hiding behind buzzwords because the moment someone checks your claims, they collapse like wet cardboard.
 
calling everything propaganda isn’t analysis, it’s the panic button you slam when facts start chewing through your ankles.

You didn’t refute a single point. You didn’t touch the evidence. You just screamed Claude bad! like a man trying to fight a smoke alarm with a broom.

That’s not wit. That’s not theory. That’s you hiding behind buzzwords because the moment someone checks your claims, they collapse like wet cardboard.
If the A.I. is biased, it behooves Damo to offer counterpoints rather than sourpuss hand-wringing. I mean, you'd think that at least one person who whines about an A.I. breakdown would be ready and willing to refute it and show just how biased it is, but they just whine and do nothing.
 
You aren't debating, you're malfunctioning. You can’t define communism. You can’t support your claim. You can’t refute my sources. So you panic, throw fallacy buzzwords like confetti, and ends with Zombie because your script has nothing else in it.

You are not exposing my brain. You are exposing the limits of your own.
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
Buzzword fallacies (debate, malfunction, claim, sources, panic).
Inversion fallacy. You cannot blame your fallacies or your illiteracy on anybody else, Zombie.
 
you’re not seeing Marxist influence,
Lie. Denial.
you’re just seeing your own bias reflected back at you like a funhouse mirror.
Inversion fallacy.
You call sources a cop‑out because you don’t have any,
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
and you call Mamdani a communist because you can’t tell the difference between academic theory and whatever political boogeyman you’ve glued together in your head.
Non-English portion ignored.
You’re not critiquing leftist academia, you’re just mad that reading is still part of the process.
YARP.

Buzzword fallacies (sources, academic theory, boogeyman, glue, critique, academia, reading, process).
Redefinition fallacies (communism<->void).

Trying to ignore the writings of Karl Marx doesn't make them go away, Zombie. Trying to ignore what 'communist' means won't work either.

Go learn English.
 
Lie. Denial.

Inversion fallacy.

Argument of the Stone fallacy.

Non-English portion ignored.

YARP.

Buzzword fallacies (sources, academic theory, boogeyman, glue, critique, academia, reading, process).
Redefinition fallacies (communism<->void).

Trying to ignore the writings of Karl Marx doesn't make them go away, Zombie. Trying to ignore what 'communist' means won't work either.

Go learn English.
You’re not identifying fallacies, you’re just yelling the names of things you half‑remember from a YouTube thumbnail. I bring evidence, you bring a bingo card. I talk about academic theory, you panic and shout ‘Marx!’ like he’s hiding in your pantry. If reading is a buzzword to you, no wonder every argument feels like a foreign language.
 
I have to laugh at Damo. His thinking that A.I. has a slant is cute, really.
AI does have a slant. So does Google. GoogleAI is no different. You can't make that just disappear. It's long been a problem with Google, which is why people are more and more using other search engines.
A.I. is incapable of having biases,
Lie. Denial.
unlike Damo.
Damo is not AI. He has a bias just like you do, but it's not one you agree with. He is fair minded and declares his reasoning for his conclusions. In other words, Damo has the philosophy of the argument on his side. All you can do is just reject it out of hand. Argument of the Stone fallacy.
It literally just lays out facts. If A.I. is slanted left, then reality must have a leftist slant.
Go learn what 'fact' means. 'Fact' does NOT mean Universal Truth. AI is not a Universal Truth nor a proof nor a fact (other than that it exists).
Yes, your reality has a leftist slant. Google and GoogleAI also has a leftist slant. So does ChatGPT.
 
Back
Top