So instead of allowing consumers to make their own choices, you support a single politician violating the rights of free speech and freedom of religion of an individual?
Not a very good slope to head down.
You also mentioned in a previous post the 'practice was abhorrent'... What practice?
Chik-Fil-A did not discriminate on who it served nor on who worked for the company. The CEO, in an interview, expressed his personal views on gay marriage. He has that right. He also has the right to do so without Mutt's proclaimed expectation of politicians who disagree trying to punish his business for his views. No matter how much we may disagree with his stance on gay marriage, he maintains those rights.
