Old Trapper
Verified User
By all means if you could possibly do so no matter how hard that might be:
"You should aim to be courteous, kind, patient, intelligent and receptive to one another.
APP - I have a theory
- Thread starter Teflon Don
- Start date
By all means if you could possibly do so no matter how hard that might be:
"You should aim to be courteous, kind, patient, intelligent and receptive to one another.
Old Trapper
Verified User
The video proves nothing. Using the words of Trump who denigrates America every chance he gets, is not an "orchestrated: conspiracy, or seeking to harm Russia. It is a reality that Trump lied, praises Putin while denigrating our intelligence community, etc. It is a tactic he has used ever since announcing his candidacy (Cruz's wife, Bush's "laziness", etc.) and he is also the first president that has met with a foreign leader and we have no clue as to what was said, or agreed to. You people whined about Obama's "open mike" comment, yet blindly accept this action (like so many others you have accepted)
Old Trapper
Verified User
Again with the childish distortions of what was said. The first example you used was a response to countryboy where he called me a "dipshit
,
and then repeated what I had said as if I had not said it.
Your second example is again an example of how you twist things to suit your fancy, not reality. There is nothing in there that shows the difference between "rigging" (insuring the outcome) of an election, and "meddling" (attempting to influence) an election.
It provides numerous examples, which is what you asked for.
Old Trapper
Verified User
Been answered twice fool, now go learn how to read. Oh wait, you know how to read, you just like being childish.
"Your second example is again an example of how you twist things to suit your fancy, not reality. There is nothing in there that shows the difference between "rigging" (insuring the outcome) of an election, and "meddling" (attempting to influence) an election. "
Aren't "rigging" and "meddling" synonyms in the context of elections?
Regarding the topic of the thread, have you noted a similarity or uniformity in the responses to the Helsinki meeting that the OP refers to?
Old Trapper
Verified User
Well, so much for intelligent conversation as if it were possible with a child like you.
Not an answer.
BTW, here is an example of the sort of thing OP is talking about:
Identical letters appear in 21 newspapers across 12 states slamming Trump's Supreme Court pick – and they're all signed by different people
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5955289/Newspapers-run-IDENTICAL-letters-slamming-Trumps-Supreme-Court-pick.html
Old Trapper
Verified User
The first question has been answered three times now, and I would suggest the child in you actually read the answer, and quit repeating the question. I remember when my children were about two years old, and used that tactic.
As to the second question, you didn't read the article, or you paid as much attention to it as you do anything else. If you had you would have read this part:
"The White House is shrugging off the technique, whose history includes similar campaigns from the Republican Party and the liberal MoveOn.org"
Anyway, this is my last response to your childish attempts to smear those that oppose Trump.
Not an answer.
