I have finally figured it out.
no is he good?
youngins......
i just turned 35 and shit my pants everyday for one year until that day.....
it fucking happens, it sucks, it is the way it is. i thought there was something magical that was supposed to happen when you're "older"....that is bullshit....period.
David Hume was the douchebag who turned modern philosophy on its head. After Decarte's rationalism, and Berkeley's and Locke's empiricism, Hume came along and took them to the extreme, claiming that you can't really trust your senses empirically or believe rationally that you exist simply because you process thoughts. Therefore, how do we know we really exist or that the world is real? Fucking joker!!
Anyway, along came Kant, who saved philosophy from being laughed off the globe due to Hume's clowning around. Or so they say. I don't know how many people take philosophy all that seriously thanks to Hume, Nietzche, etc...
There's an article in an academic journal I just got claiming that Hume can actually be viewed as part of the conservative tradition (WTF???), so that will make for an interesting read whenever I get a chance. I just read another article by an economist on Harding and the Recession of 1920-21, which explains my recent comments on it in another thread...
I don't think anyone's a straight Kantian or Humian anymore anyway. And Hume is often put in the same category of reason as Locke.
Your criticism of his thought process is an appeal to absurdity; not a logical argument. If something is true its true regardless of how absurd it seems.
all philosophy needs to be tested by Dooyeweerd's concept of Naive Thought....basically, if a philosophy is too complex to be understood readily by the man on the street, it needs to be rejected as worthless......
all philosophy needs to be tested by Dooyeweerd's concept of Naive Thought....basically, if a philosophy is too complex to be understood readily by the man on the street, it needs to be rejected as worthless......
If a truth is not readily understood by a man on the street, the man on the street needs to be rejected as worthless.
have you been studying the "philosophy" of calculus long, WM?....perhaps you can help me with something that has always puzzled me....what motivates a variable to vary?........how about you spend a couple of months considering the possibilities and get back to us.....Calculus cannot be readily understood by a man on the street.
I think Hume would be in agreement there. That is probably part of why he criticized the fusing of Greek philosophy with Christianity.
you're missing the practical application of Dooyeweerd's concept....
three philosophers were in a bar having an argument....the existentialist keeps shouting over and over "I think, therefore I am!".....after a while a drunk at the next table stands up and knocks the existentialist unconscious with a single punch.....he stands over him looking for a few moments, then he turns to the other drunks at his table and says "See? He's still here. I told you it wouldn't work. You each owe me five bucks"...........
have you been studying the "philosophy" of calculus long, WM?....perhaps you can help me with something that has always puzzled me....what motivates a variable to vary?........how about you spend a couple of months considering the possibilities and get back to us.....
Philosophy as practiced in academic circles is merely meant to entrap sharp minds