i have heard that some blacks call other blacks that think like white folk...

wanderingbear said:
And what do they call white folk who think like native americans or black folk? :)
Click to expand...

They call them Wiggers.

We call them brothers.

A note to your sig .. it is interesting to note that many liberals ran away from the term liberal and started calling themselves "progressives" because the right was being mean to liberals.
 
Don Quixote said:
the black community is not homogeneous, however, large portions may agree on some things

not being black, i would not know

i heard some weird things from some of my son's black friends when they would come over to visit

he had both black and latino friends and they would come over sometimes

they did not seem to care that i was there or not...at least in modifying the way they talked to each other...it was rather startling

oh well
Click to expand...

In the past, they were called "house nigxxxs" .. In my past, I've called other black people oreos. Today, I just call them ignorant.

That doesn't apply to every African-American who swims with republicans. JC Watts was a republican who still held his head high .. didn't apply to him. But it does apply to negroes like Alan Keyes, Allen West and Herman Cain. They are buffoons who will say anything for white favor.
 
blackascoal said:
In the past, they were called "house nigxxxs" .. In my past, I've called other black people oreos. Today, I just call them ignorant.

That doesn't apply to every African-American who swims with republicans. JC Watts was a republican who still held his head high .. didn't apply to him. But it does apply to negroes like Alan Keyes, Allen West and Herman Cain. They are buffoons who will say anything for white favor.
Click to expand...

White favor? You mean.... they get to sleep in the Big House wif da mastah?
 
Dixie said:
You help the poor and needy by giving them opportunity and enabling the means for them to prosper. It is not helping anyone to keep them shackled to dependency. All that does is enables them to remain dependent and poor. You don't really care about helping the needy, not in any real way, because if you actually helped the needy, they wouldn't need you anymore, and you need for them to be dependent on you so they can keep you empowered politically. Giving them opportunity, and enabling a system where they can engage in capitalism and free markets to achieve success and prosperity, is absolutely out of the question when you need to keep them shackled and on the plantation, voting your political party back into power again and again.

Most everyone on the right has said (repeatedly) that they don't have a problem with cutting military funding. Paul Ryan's budget proposed over $400 billion in cuts over 10 years, but your party somehow spins that into a "massive increase" in military spending. What are reasonable people supposed to do here, if you won't even be honest about this? Do you want to completely disband our military? Great, that gets you just about enough to balance Obama's checkbook for a single fiscal quarter. You still have 3/4 of the year worth of Obama debt to pay, and no military, what do you want to completely eliminate next? The FDA? Come on, it's going to take more than the $700 billion defense budget to offset $1.6 trillion in overspending... you want to tax "rich people" more? Okay, let's tax them at 100%... that gives us enough to cover about a year of Obama's overspending... what about the other three? You've now paid for ONE YEAR of Obama, by completely eliminating all our military and taxing the "rich" at 100% rate... You now have no defense, and no capitalism generating wealth for anyone. This means you now have no tax base to speak of... so what gets cut next?
Click to expand...


Dixie,you are so nieve if you think thats the way things work in the American system. Youve probably never been poor.
 
blackascoal said:
They call them Wiggers.

We call them brothers.

A note to your sig .. it is interesting to note that many liberals ran away from the term liberal and started calling themselves "progressives" because the right was being mean to liberals.
Click to expand...

They probably wernt liberals in the first place.
 
wanderingbear said:
Dixie,you are so nieve if you think thats the way things work in the American system. Youve probably never been poor.
Click to expand...

I've actually been VERY poor. When I was 19, I worked for a place selling mobile homes. I actually lived on the lot in a trailer used for storage. My boss was the type who would skip town for two weeks come payday, so even when we were owed money from commissions, we didn't get paid. Of course, selling mobile homes when you are 19, is not an easy job. People don't tend to buy a lot of mobile homes from 19 year olds... but that was my job, and that's what I did. There were days when myself and another 'salesman' would go to the nearby Hardee's and pilfer condiments. We often enjoyed a nice hot meal of Ketchup Soup, made from ketchup packets and water. For desert, it was complimentary jelly on soup crackers. When my first daughter was born, I actually had to borrow money for gas to get to the hospital. But it was her birth that motivated me. It was because of that, I decided that I wasn't going to live in poverty anymore. It wasn't for me, it was for her... I was content to live on Ketchup Soup, it was just part of dealing with life, but when I became a father that all changed, my perspective changed, and my motivations were different.

I went back to school, worked a night job full-time and had a weekend job as well. It was probably the hardest period of my life, but I was determined. Eventually, I got my degree, found a decent paying job, and things began to look up. By the time my next daughter was born, I owned my own home, by the time my third daughter was born, I also owned a vacation home. My lot in life changed because my attitude changed... nothing else.
 
blackascoal said:
They call them Wiggers.

We call them brothers.

A note to your sig .. it is interesting to note that many liberals ran away from the term liberal and started calling themselves "progressives" because the right was being mean to liberals.
Click to expand...

I'd rather call them by their names. It should not be necessary to identify people by their colour unless there is some positive advantage. Indeed 'racism' isn't words. Racism is in the mind, in the intention, in the prejudice.

Liberal is a good word that has been stolen by people who lack the intelligence to understand that progress has always been made by the left and almost never by the right. If I was American I have no doubt I would be termed a Liberal and, if that was so, I would get the biggest neon sign I could and plant it in my garden declaring that this is where the liberals live and you should count yourselves bloody lucky.
To be a Liberal in the UK is tantamount to being a weak tory. (No. I should have said a weakER tory.)
 
Dixie said:
White favor? You mean.... they get to sleep in the Big House wif da mastah?
Click to expand...

:0)

Of course they are first castrated before they get to sleep in massa's house.

Can't have negroes walking around the house with a bump in their pants and feeeling like they're equal.
 
Dixie said:
I am offended that, in the 21st Century, we still have neanderthals spewing bigotry like "think like a black" and "think like a white!"

How about we all think like ADULTS and stop being prejudiced stereotypical bigots who judge others based on their skin color?

I'm 1/8 Native American, 1/8 Asian, 1/16 African-American, 1/16 German, and 1/16 Black Dutch, how do I "think?"

If I don't "think" like my "type" is supposed to, what does that mean? Am I an "Uncle Tom?"
Click to expand...

Are you 1/3 white?
 
I've been told I'm a traitor to my race and other things such as n---er lover...these things have been said to my face with much feeling...real asswipes...they usually have that 'superior, smug smile' like they're daring you to wipe it off their face. "What'er you gonna do about it"...cracker bastards.

I have no patience with this shit, never have.
 
blackascoal said:
I know you don't see it. That's why you belong to the Tea Party brother.

Oh yeah, you can now add Arthur Davis to the list of eunuch negroes. :0)
Click to expand...

So basically, people aren't "black" anymore, if they happen to disagree with your political views?

That's sad, because white people said the same thing about other whites during civil rights... my mother was told she was no longer considered "white" because she marched with Dr. King.

Congrats, you've qualified yourself as a sheet-wearer, BAC! ....A Black Archie Bunker!
 
Dixie said:
What's "white?" German? Black Dutch? I just told you what my makeup is, why are you asking again?

Tell me... How does a person of my "type" think? How does that differ from a person of your "type?"

Can you explain this, or do you now want to be an obtuse little fuckwit?
Click to expand...

Obtuse little fuckwit, guilty as charged!
 
Dixie said:
So basically, people aren't "black" anymore, if they happen to disagree with your political views?

That's sad, because white people said the same thing about other whites during civil rights... my mother was told she was no longer considered "white" because she marched with Dr. King.

Congrats, you've qualified yourself as a sheet-wearer, BAC! ....A Black Archie Bunker!
Click to expand...

In case you haven't noticed brother .. I'm immune to meme and nonsense. I feed off it. :0)

Post where I said they are no longer black.

Can't do it .. not surprising.

It may surprise you to know that EVERY demographic has terms they use for what they percieve as traitors .. as you have acknowledged with your mother.

But here is where I get to have fun with your linguistic nonsense .. So I'm a racist because I don't like the politics of some BLACK PEOPLE?????

:rofl2:

Did you even think about that BS before you posted it? :)
 
So I'm a racist because I don't like the politics of some BLACK PEOPLE?
Click to expand...

No, you are a racist because you evaluate people on the basis of their skin color and not the content of their character. You believe certain color people have to be of a certain mindset, or they are "traitors" to the people of their color. That mindset has to believe there is an injustice being perpetrated on one color of people, who need some special advantage over another color of people to correct the injustice. All of this is prejudiced bigoted racism based on stereotype, no different than the bigots who advocated segregation on much the same basis.
 
Dixie said:
No, you are a racist because you evaluate people on the basis of their skin color and not the content of their character. You believe certain color people have to be of a certain mindset, or they are "traitors" to the people of their color. That mindset has to believe there is an injustice being perpetrated on one color of people, who need some special advantage over another color of people to correct the injustice. All of this is prejudiced bigoted racism based on stereotype, no different than the bigots who advocated segregation on much the same basis.
Click to expand...

MINDLESSLY DUMB.

I evaluated these clowns based on their political positions .. AND, I would have the exact same opinion of them if they were white.

Post where I've said that blacks or anybody else has a "special advantage" over anyone else.

Can't do that .. par for the course.

What black people have is a better perspective of black people.

Is that strange to you?

Additionally, on what authority do you presume to tell black people what to do or think about other black people?

From whence does such power come from?
 
blackascoal said:
MINDLESSLY DUMB. [NOT]

I evaluated these clowns based on their political positions .. AND, I would have the exact same opinion of them if they were white.
[But you distinguished Allen West and Herman Cain (black men) specifically, when you called them "traitors" to their race.]

Post where I've said that blacks or anybody else has a "special advantage" over anyone else.
[That's what you mean by "traitors to their race" isn't it? They don't advocate for 'black entitlement' enough for you!]

What black people have is a better perspective of black people.

[If they tow the line of you and other racist black people. But if they think differently, like Herman Cain or Allen West, then they don't have a better perspective, do they?]

Is that strange to you?

[It's strange to me that a black man can't see his own bigotry and prejudice when it mirrors the same exact bigotry and prejudice of segregationists.]

Additionally, on what authority do you presume to tell black people what to do or think about other black people?

[On the authority that I am an American who is a mixture of several races, and don't see people on the basis of skin color... something I learned from Dr. King.]

From whence does such power come from?

[TRUTH]
Click to expand...
.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top