They abandon old stuff like that when it no longer serves them.The MAGA lie that Hillary killed Epstein to protect Bill because he was on a nonexistent list? LOL
They abandon old stuff like that when it no longer serves them.The MAGA lie that Hillary killed Epstein to protect Bill because he was on a nonexistent list? LOL
I don't. I think there were a lot of rich and powerful clients on that list. If they revealed only those on the Left, then those on the Left would reveal all of those on the Right who were raping girls right next to them. It was a lose-lose move to investigate.Do you believe Pam Bondi? I actually do. But I think she was lying when she said the client list was on her desk.
Meaning they lie a lot and then never apologize for lying. Yeah, I get it.They abandon old stuff like that when it no longer serves them.
They simply go on to the next meme. Its all about meme's for them.Meaning they lie a lot and then never apologize for lying. Yeah, I get it.
I think there were documents on her desk, I think she just found out that the records were not as damning as folks originally believed. There are folks out there that truly believe that he had a "blackmail list" where he had names and crimes associated with them on a list.... I do not think so.Do you believe Pam Bondi? I actually do. But I think she was lying when she said the client list was on her desk.
I agree with you. But I am laughing at all the Republicans who went on and on, that Democrats wont release the list because they are on it.I think there were documents on her desk, I think she just found out that the records were not as damning as folks originally believed. There are folks out there that truly believe that he had a "blackmail list" where he had names and crimes associated with them on a list....
I suspect there is some serious evidence against powerful individuals. Its not on a list, its buried in the documents, and would take some piecing together.I don't. I think there were a lot of rich and powerful clients on that list. If they revealed only those on the Left, then those on the Left would reveal all of those on the Right who were raping girls right next to them. It was a lose-lose move to investigate.
Are you laughing at the Democrats who are assuming that it is because Trump is on the list? I mean...I agree with you. But I am laughing at all the Republicans who went on and on, that Democrats wont release the list because they are on it.
I would laugh at any Democrat who went on and on (especially in a campaign) referring to a "list" that their "opponent" or her husband was surely on, but will not be made public.Are you laughing at the Democrats who are assuming that it is because Trump is on the list? I mean...
I think there were documents on her desk
, I think she just found out that the records were not as damning as folks originally believed.
Think of it this way. Having your name on a business meeting note on Al Capone's calendar would not mean you were in the mob, people met with him that never committed crimes. Simply saying you've taken a plane, for instance, would not be evidence of a crime... so not a "list" and the documents are simply not "evidence" the way folks think they are.
Why didn't they publish it when the Dems were in charge? I think that it is likely the same reason now.I would laugh at any Democrat who went on and on (especially in a campaign) referring to a "list" that their "opponent" or her husband was surely on, but will not be made public.
Well I suspect TACO is in the information more than he would like, but he is not on any list. Why does she not just publish what was on her desk?
I have accused TACO of being on the list, but in jest, mocking the way they acted relating to Hillary and Bill Clinton. But IN reality, I believe there are large volumes of documents that would implicate a lot of Democrats and Republicans in this mess, I wish they would publish it all.
I am sure you are correct. But TACO and his crew were claiming to be different.Why didn't they publish it when the Dems were in charge? I think that it is likely the same reason now.
"Lock her up" - you made my day by reminding me of that chant. Why cant people look at the past and see that people are doing that same stupid shit in the present.That's fair enough of a "read" on it. NOT what she said but a reasonable post hoc justification as needed.
This is the part no one is going to believe. After years of being told that there was a "there" there and that the papers would be "released" only for them to play games with that now this?
C'mon, man, at the very least there are flight manifests which have to be registered with the aviation authorities, aren't there?
This is just nakedly a case of "Oops, Trump showed up in the files in an incriminating way, let's hide it".
You would have to be naive enough to be a Trump University graduate to think there's "nothing" damning in any of the Epstein files for DJT. He's KNOWN to be good friends with JE.
And Trump has a "record" of not particularly behaving appropriately when it comes to carnal relations. Whether it's an sexual assault on a woman at Bergdorfs or walking into the Miss Teen USA dressing rooms....Trump has some "issues" with the guardrails around sexual relations.
OK. But for the party that chanted "LOCK HER UP" for YEARS without EVER finding anything they could charge her with, I'm surprised at how "fair and balanced" the Right is about THIS.
I’m sure it was because of who is on the list.Why didn't they publish it when the Dems were in charge? I think that it is likely the same reason now.
I'd love to see the documents without redaction and let the chips fall where they may. However, I am certain that there are reams of "paper" going missing as we type.I’m sure it was because of who is on the list.
Democrats, Republicans and foreign dignitaries. It’s a coverup and it’s shameful.
She told Fox News last February that she had the list on her desk. Why do you think so many MAGAts in Congress want her to be canned over this?I think there were documents on her desk, I think she just found out that the records were not as damning as folks originally believed. There are folks out there that truly believe that he had a "blackmail list" where he had names and crimes associated with them on a list.... I do not think so.
Think of it this way. Having your name on a business meeting note on Al Capone's calendar would not mean you were in the mob, people met with him that never committed crimes. Simply saying you've taken a plane, for instance, would not be evidence of a crime... so not a "list" and the documents are simply not "evidence" the way folks think they are.
Agreed on all of the above. Furthermore, I believe Trump had business dealings with both Jeffrey and Ghislaine.I suspect there is some serious evidence against powerful individuals. Its not on a list, its buried in the documents, and would take some piecing together.
I suspect TACO is in there.
Bondi wasn't thinking that far ahead when she said the list was on her desk.I don't. I think there were a lot of rich and powerful clients on that list. If they revealed only those on the Left, then those on the Left would reveal all of those on the Right who were raping girls right next to them. It was a lose-lose move to investigate.