I love how so many on this forum......

Poles are definitely the most fearless people.

In 1683 Jan III Sobieski lead the biggest calvary charge in history wiyh lances & sabers against Turkish Muslims armed with Jannisary guns & cannons.

The Poles won & beat the much larger Turkish forc we s at the Battle of Vienna.

In the Battle if Mokra in 1939 Polish cavalry with sabers sliced through Nazi German infantry armed with Surmguwehrs & guns & the Poles won.

That’s cool. I never knew any. But had some Irish buds that would go to the Samoan bars with me. They loved to fight. Lol


Blessin’s
 
That’s cool. I never knew any. But had some Irish buds that would go to the Samoan bars with me. They loved to fight. Lol


Blessin’s

You know that's a good question.

Idk.

I think Irish are more hot headed & impulsive & Poles are more strong & disciplined.

But not always.

There's been a lot of good Polish & Irish blooded fighters.

But, I think Poles on average are a bit tougher.

I mean Polish Hooligans are the most respected & feared fighters in Europe.
It appears
Pole Hooligand are tougher than Irish ones.

Below brave Poles went into a Northern Irish bar & Poles appeared to be outnumbered & winning in hand to hand combat.

But. Then they acted like Nuggas ,& threw chairs & ruined their own bar.
 
Hahahaha yes .
The American soldier hands down best ever.
With exception to David’s mighty men (who had divine enabling tho)


Blessin’s

Even Polish World's strongest man does MMA.

He might not be the best in MMA.

But, I do believe he's the only Strongmam who does MMA.

He is fun to watch.

 
Hahahaha yes .
The American soldier hands down best ever.
With exception to David’s mighty men (who had divine enabling tho)


Blessin’s

Hate to say it, as the son of a Vietnam veteran & his brother a Vietnam Veteran & purple heart.

If Americans are so tough they lost to smaller forces at Vietnam?

America just is the biggest White nation & has tons of money to throw into military.

My father gets pissed off when American corporations outsource to Vietnam & American tourists travel to Vietnam.

It's like they suffered for nothing, considering Vietnam is still a semi Commie state.
 
If true.
Then ALL modern Americans benefitted.
Including Blacks.

Maybe thats why Afro Americans are richer than Africa?

Personally I don't think an Agarian rural slave economy of slaves & serfs hundreds of years ago
Has.much
To do with modern technological economies.

It produced the capital.
 
Far less developed imperial power at the start, less exploitative slavery, very different sort of land to steal, far less racist thieves in charge.

1.) Wrong. Brazil was larger than the 13 Colonies way back.

In fact if you exclude Alaska which only became a state in 1959. Brazil vs the Lower 48 USA are about the same size in land mass.

2.) Wrong, Brazil took 35% of all slaves in the Atlantic Slave Trade
& the USA just 5%.

Brazil also ended slavery later than the USA.

3.) Less racist thieves in charge? What id Madurro except Brazilian Trump?

Let me also add Brazil is the Portuguese version of the America.
 
Accuse the right of racism or call out racism at every turn whether it exists or not. Then of course snuggle right up to Guno,... far and away the biggest racist on the forum. Simply because he is left wing. THIS is why you are not taken seriously. You are a joke. A punchline. How truly typical. ;)

As always,...the left will lay down with ANY DOG if they think it helps their corrupt cause. You have no honor whatsoever....

There's a lot of racism in politics both overt and covert. Each side likes to play the Race Card when it's convenient and seek to manipulate voters using race politics as a lever.

The reason racism is still strong in America is because it's politically expedient to keep it alive as a motivational tool. It doesn't matter if racism, birtherism, or anything else actually exists; through the power of social media, cable news and the Internet, they can make it exist for several million receptive Americans.
 
1.) Wrong. Brazil was larger than the 13 Colonies way back.

In fact if you exclude Alaska which only became a state in 1959. Brazil vs the Lower 48 USA are about the same size in land mass.

2.) Wrong, Brazil took 35% of all slaves in the Atlantic Slave Trade
& the USA just 5%.

Brazil also ended slavery later than the USA.

3.) Less racist thieves in charge? What id Madurro except Brazilian Trump?

Let me also add Brazil is the Portuguese version of the America.

Witold; you'd look smarter if you could actually back up your claims with factual references.
 
More like asking you for proof of election fraud or explaining how you got goofy enough to believe Pence will make Trump prez on Jan. 6. Facts are quite elusive for you.

...not to mention such an act would be reinstalling himself as VP. Pence of course won't do such "foolishness," but imagine if Trump was in that chair,
you know he would. Which is why he should never have been Potus. He is lawless.
 
Witold; you'd look smarter if you could actually back up your claims with factual references.

Oops I made a boo boo.

This says more like 40% of the Black slaves in the Atlantic Slave Trade ended up in Brazil.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Brazil

Demand for African slaves did not wane after the decline of the mining industry in the second half of the 18th century. Cattle ranching and foodstuff production proliferated after the population growth, both of which relied heavily on slave labor. 1.7 million slaves were imported to Brazil from Africa from 1700 to 1800, and the rise of coffee in the 1830s further enticed expansion of the slave trade.

Brazil was the last country in the Western world to abolish slavery. By the time it was abolished, on May 13, 1888, an estimated four million slaves had been imported/taken from Africa to Brazil, 40% of the total number of slaves brought to the Americas.[citation
 
Back
Top