I LOVED the certification.....

IBDaMann said:
What about wanting to make America great again makes someone a moron? You've never said. I'm wondering if you don't know but are too embarrassed to admit it.


It's you who needs to listen to Trump's message, and listen for comprehension. You are a total moron who has only ever had "Did you hear what Trump said? Did you hear what Trump said? Did ya'? Did ya'? Did you hear what Trump said?" ... tightly cropped and taken completely out of context.

Who, besides other leftist shit-for-brains, do you believe you are fooling?

Did you hear what Trump said? Did ya'? Did ya'?

You're an idiot.
Click to expand...
So you are admitting you have never ACTUALLY listened to what Trump has been saying?
YOU are a complete ASSHOLE.
 
IBDaMann said:
When DAs, Mayors, Governors and law enforcement types talk about putting people behind bars, do they ever include the clause "while affording them due process"? No, of course not. It is always assumed.

You bear the full burden to show that Trump intended to somehow deprive said Americans of their due process.

The floor is yours.
Click to expand...
and as people have been saying for years when you ASSUME something you make an ass out of you and me.
this time it is mostly you and not me.
 
Tbird19482 said:
Go back and listen to his campaign speeches.
Click to expand...


You made the claim.

In an online discussion, the burden of proof generally falls on the person making the assertion. This principle is based on several key points:

  1. Philosophical Basis: Philosophically, this aligns with the concept known as "onus probandi" or the burden of proof, which states that the one who makes a claim must provide evidence to support it. This is to prevent endless debates where one must disprove every possible claim without any supporting evidence from the claimant.
  2. Logical Argumentation: In logical debates, an assertion without evidence can be dismissed as unsubstantiated. If someone claims "X is true," they should be able to back it up with evidence, data, or logical reasoning. Otherwise, it's just an opinion or belief, not a fact.
  3. Practicality in Discussions: For discussions to be productive, this rule helps maintain focus and clarity. If everyone had to prove the negative of every claim made, discussions could become chaotic and unmanageable. By placing the burden on the asserter, it encourages more thoughtful, evidence-based dialogue.

@Grok
 
Tbird19482 said:
So you are admitting you have never ACTUALLY listened to what Trump has been saying?
Click to expand...
So you are admitting that you blew the English comprehension section of the SAT? Don't worry, everybody already knew.

Did ya' hear what Trump said?

Tbird19482 said:
YOU are a complete ASSHOLE.
Click to expand...
Yep, and you are a mindless shill who is bent over furniture and reamed by those who are taking full advantage of you. This wouldn't have happened if you had developed critical reasoning skills and the ability to think for yourself.

Did ya' hear what Trump said? Did ya'? Did ya'? Don't you ever get tired of existing in a mindless collective with this being all that you have? Don't you ever get tired of having other people do your thinking for you?

blank-stare-zone-out.gif
 
Stone said:
Seeing the old Ho being forced to certify Trumps election win against her was simply divine. Had that crow literally JAMMED right down her throat then was made to eat a big old shit sandwich live on stage in front of everyone! :laugh: How perfect..............;):)

Now the big question is...........do you think that the incoming administration begins the process of legally going after the corrupt to the core pair? I myself would put it at 50/50. But,......MANY other big names wont be so lucky. Quite a lot of them actually. A long overdue PURGE is coming. REAL justice for a change. Lefties,.......prepare for impact and buckle up. It wont help you AT ALL,.. but hey,....Make a game of it at least anyway. ;):)
Click to expand...
Yeah, following the Constitution is “eating a big old shit sandwich,”but, but, but, MAGA loves the Constitution

NEXT
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top