I now understand the order to stay in your homes

[DamnYankee]

Irrational fear that prompts you to bring a deadly weapon into your home... Smart.

Irrational? There are thousands of instances in the US every year where a gun in the home has saved the life and property of its owner.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I get it.... you are an anarchist. if they told people to act normally, you'd be bitching about the Gubmint putting them in harm's way with a dangerous terrorist on the loose. So no matter what....they'd be wrong.

you have spittle on your mouth from your rage.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

You got it!!! If they told people to about their business and this guy blew up a bus, STY would be on here mocking us for believing the government was going to protect us.

you're a seriously deluded moron if you think that, but hey. I get it. let's attack the Libertarian.

 

[Steelplate]

the question is what is better at providing safety to the community. do you believe that mandatory background checks that will not affect violent criminals in any way, shape, or form is a better way of providing security than rounding up all violent criminals and the criminally insane and locking them up forever?

Hey....dumberthanmost....you have stats to show that NO VIOLENT CRIMINALS or CRIMINALLY INSANE people buy weapons from private sales?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

the twitter sphere is showing us whats happening in watertown today. here's an example of what is NOT a police state.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Hey....dumberthanmost....you have stats to show that NO VIOLENT CRIMINALS or CRIMINALLY INSANE people buy weapons from private sales?

still refusing to answer the question? and you call me dumberthanmost LOL

 

[Steelplate]

still refusing to answer the question? and you call me dumberthanmost LOL

Your question is stupid... first off, it has an assumption that the background checks wouldn't make things much more difficult for criminals and madmen to obtain weapons.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Your question is stupid... first off, it has an assumption that the background checks wouldn't make things much more difficult for criminals and madmen to obtain weapons.

you, sir, are a moron. how many criminals do you think will say 'I can't buy another gun because I can't pass background check'?

 

[Steelplate]

you, sir, are a moron. how many criminals do you think will say 'I can't buy another gun because I can't pass background check'?

Won't limit their options one bit....will it?

 

[Jarod]

Irrational? There are thousands of instances in the US every year where a gun in the home has saved the life and property of its owner.

And thousands where a gun in the home has taken the life or life of a loved one of its owner.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Won't limit their options one bit....will it?

no, it won't. they'll simply break in to more homes and steal more guns. there's also this thing called the black market. maybe you've heard about it?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

And thousands where a gun in the home has taken the life or life of a loved one of its owner.

jarod has a point. start with watertown, since the cops and national guard are out in full force. start rounding up and confiscating every single firearm they can find. watertown will soon be safer than mayberry.

 

[Jarod]

right on. fuck that whole freedom of movement and right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure shit. about time we did away with that.

I think people are free, but are choosing not to travel at the request, not the demand of Police.

 

[Steelplate]

no, it won't. they'll simply break in to more homes and steal more guns. there's also this thing called the black market. maybe you've heard about it?

Yeah....I've heard about both.....how many were bought at private sales?

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I think people are free, but are choosing not to travel at the request, not the demand of Police.

certainly the cops would never harass an individual who chose to disregard their request, right?

 

[Jarod]

I dont belive they should require anyone to stay home, or require anyone to consent to a search.

If they do, I belvie that would be unconstitutional.. and actionable.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Yeah....I've heard about both.....how many were bought at private sales?

you have a stat for it? throw it out here.

 

[Jarod]

certainly the cops would never harass an individual who chose to disregard their request, right?

No they would, but that would be wrong. I am watching on CNN, right now, where people are out and about mixing with the police who are searching homes. The people might be allowing the searches, or maybe not. If its not voluntary, its wrong.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No they would, but that would be wrong. I am watching on CNN, right now, where people are out and about mixing with the police who are searching homes. The people might be allowing the searches, or maybe not. If its not voluntary, its wrong.

if they are allowing the searches, so be it. but are they using intimidation or threats?

 

[DamnYankee]

And thousands where a gun in the home has taken the life or life of a loved one of its owner.

Wrong. Accidental deaths by a gun in the home are very rare.