I predict that the S&P 500 will be well under 5,000 by September 30th

gfm7175 said:
Yes, he is. He is GROWING the economy and is bringing TRILLIONS of dollars into the USA.

Good. It's about damn time that somebody does.

Those two don't give a single fuck about debt reduction (and never have).

They are the biggest frauds that CONgress has ever seen, ESPECIALLY Thomas Massie. They are only good for grandstanding; nothing more. There's a reason why I now refer to them (and their caucus) as the "Freedom Clowns". All they ever seem to accomplish is making it much more difficult for the MAGA movement to get shit done in a pragmatic matter.

They (still to this day) oppose Trump's tariffs, which are now bringing in HUNDREDS of BILLIONS of dollars in very short order, which is accomplishing much more for "debt reduction" than any of those grandstanding clowns have ever accomplished. At this point, I swear that Massie in particular is a Democrat asset. The freedom clowns always talk a really great-sounding game about "muh principles" but then never actually accomplish anything beyond grandstanding and voting with the Democrats. They're completely and utterly USELESS and should be primaried out of CONgress in 2026.

When push came to shove, instead of standing with President Trump and MAGA, "Masshole" Massie and "Principled" Paul both stood WITH every single Democrat against the bill... against "no tax on tips", against "no tax on overtime", against codified spending cuts, FOR a huuuuuge tax hike (via expired Trump tax cuts), etc etc...

They are both FRAUDS and they are both trying [and failing] to (grand)stand in the way of MAGA pragmatically ushering in the golden age.

FUCK them and all of their "sweet nothing" whisperings, their theatrical grandstanding, and their lack of any real accomplishments besides standing ALONGSIDE Team Democrat and AGAINST Team MAGA during any pivotal moment.
Click to expand...
fuck Rand Paul especially.

keep him employed to take down fauci though.

but he has to sleep in the slaves shed.
 
Based Chad said:
you keep citing a case that's not really relevant.
Click to expand...
not just a case. a century of understanding. nobody agrees with you. nobody

you are on an island pretending we elect a king. you are an idiot. kids in grade school get the separation of powers better

this link will show what a fucking buffoon you are...assuming you can comprehend anything which is obviously questionable

U.S. Senate: Rejected Treaties

www.senate.gov www.senate.gov
 
Last edited:
zymurgy said:
not just a case. a century of understanding. nobody agrees with you. nobody

you are on an island pretending we elect a king. you are an idiot. kids in grade school get the separation of powers better
Click to expand...
maga does. the adminsistration does. mainsteam media is coming around.

you people are libertarian globalist dingleberries.

the consitution is clear.

and it is supreme in the America I love and hold dear.
 
Based Chad said:
maga does. the adminsistration does. mainsteam media is coming around.

you people are libertarian globalist dingleberries.

the consitution is clear.

and it is supreme in the America I love and hold dear.
Click to expand...
yes it is clear. the senate has power to set tariffs, and approve a treaty, not the president

you are an idiot. that is clear. otherwise the treaty of Versailles being rejected would not of happened
you simply don't know our history our our laws
 
zymurgy said:
yes it is clear. the senate has power to set tariffs, and approve a treaty, not the president

you are an idiot. that is clear. otherwise the treaty of Versailles being rejected would not of happened
you simply don't know our history our our laws
Click to expand...
approve the presidents treaty.

and this has nothing to do with your other case.

you have conceded.
 
zymurgy said:
without senate approval, the treaty PROPOSAL is dead and has no power. hence is not a treaty


derp derp

I have demolished your claims with proof

case after case shows congress has the power.

all you do is repeat your retarded nonsense about how it is in the constitution
Click to expand...

it the presidents way or nothing.
 
the Senate cannot do a treaty without the president.

and still nothing to do with the case you say is relevant.

it is.

this is all constitutional.
 
Last edited:
Based Chad said:
the Senate cannot do a treaty without the president.

and still nothing to do with the case you say is relevant.

it is.

this all constitutional.
Click to expand...
a treaty without senate approval has no power

so you lose.

and not quoting me as a way to hide from losing the debate is transparent and comical. ^coward
 
zymurgy said:
a treaty without senate approval has no power

so you lose.

and not quoting me as a way to hide from losing the debate is transparent and comical. ^coward
Click to expand...
no.
its the presidents treaty.

still nothing to do with the case you say is relevant.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top