Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
to make fun of your failed campaign that has to be explained all the time.
I predict that the S&P 500 will be well under 5,000 by September 30th
- Thread starter Walt
- Start date
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
Walter purposefully makes himself stupider to try to come up with lies and disractions.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
market makers also trading though and suspending stocks when their personal trades go south is insider trading though.
markets can be made honestly and without bias, demonic corruptocrat fool.
or do you want the world to just reject you demons outright?
quit lying, fuckstick.
Sammy Jankis
Was it me?
not a pump and dump at all.
completely wrong and a lie.
its about institutional corruption at a deep level.
The value of an asset must be marked for many reasons, such as when it is used as collateral for a loan, for tax purposes, or just to see if what valuation benchmarks are being hit. So if you are getting a mortgage on a house, the bank needs to mark is value, even though no sale is happening.
What you are describing would be mark to limit. I have a limit order set on my puts of $186, even though the current market price is $2.57. The limit order is the price I would be willing to sell the asset, without knowing anything else. So if I sleep through a huge rise in prices, at $186, I do not believe they will go that much higher that I would be able to delay selling them with the possibility of losing out. I could just as easily set the price at a trillion dollars each. If we used mark to limit, then I would able to claim to be the richest man on earth.
Or put another way, imagine you have a house that as a realistic value of $100k. You live there, so would not sell at $100k, but would demand a premium to move out of a house you love. Then you start thinking, and say you will sell the house for a billion dollars. If the bank used mark to limit, they would loan you $500 million on that house that now has a value of a billion dollars.
The paperwork was filed in NYC. The loan was made in NYC. The collateral was partly in NYC, and partly outside NYC.
GameStop is a publicly traded stock. It used mark to market, which meant that the market set the price. It never stopped trading on the exchanges, so aside from nights, weekends, and holidays, it always had a market price.
The people who shorted GameStop lost billions because they could not set the price of GameStop.
It is rigged in ways completely beyond your imagination.
Real estate is pretty much always mark to model. Real estate is not fungible, especially not the real estate trump uses as collateral. It is an illiquid market, the same piece of real estate is not constantly being bought and sold. Even when a piece of real estate is being bought and sold, it is impossible to know if it is a good deal or not without mark to model.
What trump is guilty of is lying in the inputs into the model. he lied about the size of his NYC condo, tripling its size to increase its value. he lied about whether he could sell mar-a-lardo for condos, again increasing its value.
trump had o use mark to model, but he did not have to lie about the inputs into the model. That was a crime.
More a meme than a campaign. It is what has pushed back up the markets, so not poor.
Into the Night
Verified User
Essentially broker profit margin. It's how the brokers make money. That's not rigging.
Into the Night
Verified User
A sale IS happening. The sale of the loan.
Don't try to look smart, Wally. Attempted proof and definition by contrivance.
It's at 6,094 as of 12:00 06/25/25I predict that the S&P 500 will be well under 5,000 by September 30th, and I put my money where my mouth is. I have bought a bunch of SPY puts centering around a strike price of $500, all expiring on September 30th. If the S&P goes down to around 4,000, I will make quite a bit of money.
If the S&P 500 stays above 5,000, then you can laugh at me
Your prediction don't look too good.
First off, it was the opposite of insider trading. They did not have insider information, nor any knowledge that the public did not have about the value of the stock. In fact, because of the ignorance, they had less information than the general public had, which is why they took the wrong side in the trade.
For the most part the "smart money", like Plotkin, were not market makers. They took only one side of the trade, unlike a market maker who would be willing to take both sides. Calling them market makers is false, and more importantly misleading.
Trading of the stock was never suspended on the exchanges. Robinhood suspended buying long positions on GameStop, but you could easily use Schwab, TD Ameritrade, or a thousand other brokerages to trade on the exchange.
The best you could claim was that it was market manipulation. It is a bit of a stretch, but you could claim that "smart money" refusing to pay Robinhood to sell long positions manipulated the market.
Sammy is right. It was a bit of a pump, but that is not uncommon. There was no dumping.
....TRUMP.....fucking the economy up......
Another dumbest post of the day candidate.
You are correct. Right now, it looks bad. It may turn around, or the market might outlast me. We shall see.
