I Thought Things Changed?

Howey

Banned
Listening to Boehner yesterday I had the impression this was a new, improved Congress...One willing to work together with the President to address the issues facing us.

Hell, he even cried (again)!

But...alas...Batshit crazy Michele Bachmann somehow managed to get reelected.

A repeal Obamacare bill was the first to see the floor in the 113th Congress, and, not surprisingly, it was Minnesota Republican Michele Bachmann who filed it.

If the repeal Obamacare bill seems familiar, that’s because it is. The 112th Congress tried 33 times to repeal the landmark legislation crafted by Obama and passed by Congress, and every time the bills were shot down in the Democrat-controlled Senate.

The continued insistence of repealing Obamacare by House Republicans has drawn harsh criticism, The Huffington Post notes. Whether related to the endless introduction of repeal Obamacare bills or not, this Congress was rated as the least productive of all time. Though Congress is able to handle more than one item of business at a time, the focus on repealing Obamacare became a trademark of that unproductive Congress.

As Think Progress notes, the efforts to pass a repeal Obamacare bill have come at the expense of other, more dire priorities. The 112th Congress has failed to pass a relief package for Hurricane Sandy victims, drawing criticism from the left and right alike. Republicans in Congress have also been criticized for failing to re-authorize the Violence Against Women Act.

The tide could be turning against efforts to repeal Obamacare, The Huffington Post noted:

“But while Bachmann is still keen on undoing President Barack Obama’s health care reform package, some Republicans and GOP governors have begun to accept the law of the land, at least in pieces. And the public appears to be cooling on the idea of repealing the measure. A survey taken in the wake of Obama’s November reelection found that only a third of Americans were in favor of eliminating the law, a record low.”

540798_268286443299825_1005111410_n.jpg
 
Guess you missed Rep. Conyers asking again for two reparations resolutions. (Did you know his wife got moved from federal prison to a half way house?)

Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) introduced two reparations resolutions on the first day of the 113th Congress.


The first, H.R. 40, is “to acknowledge the fundamental injustice, cruelty, brutality, and inhumanity of slavery in the United States and the 13 American colonies between 1619 and 1865 and to establish a commission to examine the institution of slavery, subsequently de jure and de facto racial and economic discrimination against African-Americans, and the impact of these forces on living African-Americans, to make recommendations to the Congress on appropriate remedies, and for other purposes.”


The second, H.R. 98, is “to provide a remedy for survivors and descendants of the victims of the Tulsa, Oklahoma Race Riot of 1921.”

Neither has been received by the GPO yet for the full text to be available.


Both have been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.


But Conyers has introduced reparations bills at the beginning of each Congress — picking the number H.R. 40 to symbolize the “40 acres and a mule” promise made to freed slaves during the Civil War. Such bills have never made it to a floor debate.

H.R. 40 in the 112th Congress would have established a seven-member reparations commission, with three members appointed by the president, three by the speaker of the House, and one by the president pro tempore of the Senate, to come back to Congress after a year with recommendations.

The panel would be tasked with determining “whether, in consideration of the Commission’s findings, any form of compensation to the descendants of African slaves is warranted.”


“If the Commission finds that such compensation is warranted, what should be the amount of compensation, what form of compensation should be awarded, and who should be eligible for such compensation,” last Congress’ resolution read.

Last Congress’ Tulsa act said “every person who, in connection with the Tulsa, Oklahoma race riot of 1921 and its aftermath, acted under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of the State of Oklahoma to subject, or cause to be subjected, any person to the deprivation, on account of race, of any right secured at the time of the deprivation by Oklahoma law, shall be liable to the party injured in a civil action for redress.”

It had one co-sponsor, Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.).

Wonder when black America is going to get off its ass and stop playing the victim.
 
Good for him! That's an annual tradition. It's about time blacks in America were paid reparations for the evils of the racist slaveowners!

I would agree to compensation of the actual slaves, but their descendants, I don't agree.
 
I would agree to compensation of the actual slaves, but their descendants, I don't agree.

Since they're, umm...dead...I guess it would be ok to give it to the relatives. :)

Didn't they do the same thing for the Japanese and American Indians?
 
Since they're, umm...dead...I guess it would be ok to give it to the relatives. :)

Didn't they do the same thing for the Japanese and American Indians?

You have a point, how would one go about proving they were related to a former slave? I would not agree to all blacks being compensated.
 
You have a point, how would one go about proving they were related to a former slave? I would not agree to all blacks being compensated.

lol...I'd worry about that when it happens. He's introduced this bill for like, what? 40 years?
 
Listening to Boehner yesterday I had the impression this was a new, improved Congress...One willing to work together with the President to address the issues facing us.

Hell, he even cried (again)!

But...alas...Batshit crazy Michele Bachmann somehow managed to get reelected.]

What bothers me more is that we keep electing these people - this congress whose approval rating's been around 15% for years. :palm:
 
Back
Top