I told you so

I Love America said:
Yes, I believe that people should have the freedom to discriminate based on race or whatever reason they choose. As I have said plenty of times but apparently flies right over your head, that doesn't mean I support the actual act. I don't think people should discriminate against people because of race, but I think they should be allowed to do so. Why is that so complicated for you to understand? Too deep a thought?

As for the case in Georgia you cite, are you talking about a recent case or something from the sordid days of democrat Jim Crow south?
Click to expand...

Your support of racism is what you cite as a sign of your depth? It is indicative.

No one cares if they discriminate in private. If they operate a business open to the public then that is another matter and their "freedom" restricts others, burdens others and the state.

I was referring to the segregated prom in Georgia.

You are arguing based on some fantasy world where the bigot just quietly tolerates a protester and not based on the reality that such acts lead to confrontations and are destructive to social cohesion.
 
Sir Digby Chicken Caesar said:
Your support of racism is what you cite as a sign of your depth? It is indicative.

No one cares if they discriminate in private. If they operate a business open to the public then that is another matter and their "freedom" restricts others, burdens others and the state.

I was referring to the segregated prom in Georgia.

You are arguing based on some fantasy world where the bigot just quietly tolerates a protester and not based on the reality that such acts lead to confrontations and are destructive to social cohesion.
Click to expand...

How is a person harmed by not being able to be served in an establishment? They aren't. They merely choose another establishment. And if that establishment says no, then the free market with all of its wisdom will provide.

If you believe in free markets then there is no need for gobblement coercion. A private business should be able to cater to whom they choose for whatever reason they choose. It does not burden the state one bit. If you walk in the establishment and they don't like the way you look they can refuse you service and should be allowed. You are a statist and your ad hom attacks calling me a racist merely hides your iinability to articulate a defense of your opinion and exposes your fantasy of being a libertarian. You are nothing more than a statist liberal.
 
I Love America said:
If your business can't discriminate then you do not have the freedom to not associate with queers. You really are stupid aren't you. As for "my kind", it was democrats who passed all of those Jim Crow laws which I know you libtards want to conveniently forget.
Click to expand...

I hope you're aware that homosexuality is not a virus and you can't catch homosexuality by "association"; ie: doing business with!! :palm:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I hope you're aware that homosexuality is not a virus and you can't catch homosexuality by "association"; ie: doing business with!! :palm:
Click to expand...

I never said I wouldn't do business with a queer. I don't hang out with them personally, but their money is as good as anyone else's. In fact, I have found that you can charge them more than straights. So why not? I just think people should be allowed to not do business with them. I don't necessarily think they should
 
I Love America said:
I never said I wouldn't do business with a queer. I don't hang out with them personally, but their money is as good as anyone else's. In fact, I have found that you can charge them more than straights. So why not? I just think people should be allowed to not do business with them. I don't necessarily think they should
Click to expand...

Since you 'feel' this way, it makes you no better then a bigot; seeing as how you now have shown that racism is OK with you also.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Since you 'feel' this way, it makes you no better then a bigot; seeing as how you now have shown that racism is OK with you also.
Click to expand...

People should be free to associate with or not associate with whomever they choose for whatever reason they choose. That is the essence of freedom. No odd said freedom was pretty.
 
I Love America said:
How is a person harmed by not being able to be served in an establishment? They aren't. They merely choose another establishment. And if that establishment says no, then the free market with all of its wisdom will provide.

If you believe in free markets then there is no need for gobblement coercion. A private business should be able to cater to whom they choose for whatever reason they choose. It does not burden the state one bit. If you walk in the establishment and they don't like the way you look they can refuse you service and should be allowed. You are a statist and your ad hom attacks calling me a racist merely hides your iinability to articulate a defense of your opinion and exposes your fantasy of being a libertarian. You are nothing more than a statist liberal.
Click to expand...

Non responsive. I already explained how they are harmed and how the state is burdened.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top