If anyone wants to know why Nancy Pelosi hasn't called a vote to impeach

reagansghost said:
Nancy is not required to hold this imaginary vote you're clinging to, one of Trump's handlers had a sit-down with Hannity and Cucker……….voila, another conspiracy for the suckers
Click to expand...

Oh there is no law saying she does, I grant you that

But, rest assured, if she thought she had the votes she would. She doesn't, so she won't

But, hey she has you fooled into thinking she is impeaching Trump so that is all that matters
 
archives said:
Some Republicans called for Obama's impeachment nearly the entire eight years he was in office, says nothing, there is always a few with the quick rhetoric

And I told you why she isn't in any hurry, the dominoes are falling with each day's testimony, now she has Gov't officials past and present defying Trump's no cooperation order and appearing, so why should she stop now, every day becomes another concern for the White House
Click to expand...

You made excuses for the bitch. End of story.
 
archives said:
Ah, no, Mueller himself laid out what he interpreted legally as collusion, and concluded was it too complex to proceed along those lines, but he did document the one hundred contacts with Russians, if you read it, which I'm sure you didn't, it seemed the Russians did everything but park cars

And I don't care either way about 2016, I had hoped Clinton got elected for the sake of the country, inwhich I was right, but if she had we would have missed all the endless entertainment Trump supplies plus witnessing how some of his supporters gulliblely will swallow anything to defend him
Click to expand...

No collusion, No obstruction.

If there had been either or both, Democrats would have impeached like they said they would do.

You're still whining because another one of your bitches got her ass kicked in 2016.
 
StoneByStone said:
Yes, she's playing politics, which I disagree with. Her job is to uphold the law, even if she's unsuccessful.
Click to expand...

But part of her politics is pretending there’s a crime involved.

This charade is just another fishing expedition that only began with the ‘Russian’ investigation [it was never NOT a criminal investigation of Trump]; it won’t end till Trump leaves office.
 
StoneByStone said:
The reason Pelosi never called for impeachment is because she knows most of the Republicans are so cucked that they'll vote to keep Trump.
Click to expand...

LIE and LAME; Pelosi doesn't need any Republican votes. She has a majority along straight party lines. Now let's try again; why hasn't she called for a vote?
 
StoneByStone said:
Colluding with a foreign country for help in a presidential election and then obstructing justice are crimes. Using the office of the presidency for personal gain is also a crime.
If you disagree, just pretend it was Obama asking Ukraine for help.
Click to expand...

Those are lies. Why do you continue to bloviate outright lies? We have the transcript. The transcript does not support the lies you are bloviating with.
 
archives said:
She doesn't have to have a full House vote to commence an inquiry, which she has done, to actually impeach she needs a full House vote

And you people are kidding yourself, if she wanted the full House vote she could get it tomorrow, but why when she has Trump and the White House on the ropes collecting damaging information by the day
Click to expand...

Yes, she does. And no matter how many times you parrot that dumb, false narrative, that is how it is done. Otherwise, it is nothing more than a Partisan clown show. ;)
 
archives said:
That is not true, billy barr got out in front of the report, framing what surely was a White House narrative that they could sell, and they did, they knew no one was going to read the report, see the one hundred plus contacts with Russians, comprehend Mueller's full explanation of defining collusion, but they will remember billy barr's characterization. "no collusion, no obstruction"
Click to expand...

We have the entire report you lying hack; Barr didn't have to frame anything. It was available for you to read. Instead, you continue to ignorantly parrot a narrative you've been fed like a gullible dupe on steroids.
 
archives said:
Well, first off, the Democrats have only had control of the House for ten months now, so I don't know how she would call for impeachment before that, and why should she do it now, as I said, she has Trump and the White House on the ropes, slowly lesser subordinates are defying Trump, constructing a case, could only be a matter of time before one of the others gets nervous and comes forward, she is in no hurry
Click to expand...

She has the majority now. She isn't calling for a vote for two reasons; (1) she might not get a majority; and (2) it places Democrats who come from red districts in jeopardy. You see, the Party of the Jackass isn't interested in gullible low IQ dupes like you. They are only interested in political power.

Poor Arsecheese; still stuck on moron. :laugh:
 
archives said:
According to billy barr, as I noted, he framed the interpretation, which is exactly why Trump appointed him, but even billy barr can't help Trump now especially when billy barr might be part of the inquiry
Click to expand...

Barr didn't have to do anything. We have the entire report. Only a moron continues to bloviate a false narrative, much like the Ukrainian HOAX, that isn't supported by the facts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top