If FBI comes back with nothing

Guille said:
We now know she lied several times yesterday.
Click to expand...

No she didn't.

He did, though. He lied about being able to legally drink at 17 when the drinking age when he was 17 was 21.

So that was a lie.

Look, I don't think Brett is capable of making it through the day without getting drunk. I think he needs to be drunk because he simply doesn't know what it's like to live a day sober. That defensiveness and dependency was on full display yesterday.

Confront any alcoholic and they will respond exactly like him. Ever watch "Intervention"? Do yourself a favor.
 
Guille said:
Are you fucking serious? you think it takes the FBI to look up public records or do a Lexus/Nexus?
Click to expand...

You said she was "investigated", then when prompted for that information, your response is to get defensive just like Brett did yesterday.

So the pathology he has, you probably have too. Alcoholics tend to congregate among one another to share in their alcoholism so they don't have to feel as bad or alone.
 
Red Crow said:
Due process does matter to Americans .... as it has always matter.

It does not matter to the Fascist Left ... as it has never mattered to Fascist.
Click to expand...

We're the ones who wanted an FBI investigation.

You're the ones who didn't want one.

So you're the ones who don't want due process.
 
Red Crow said:
I guess you thin 7 will be the charm, huh
Click to expand...

Not sure why you think a background check is the same thing as an investigation.

Maybe you do know they're not the same thing, but because you're an alcoholic who defends other alcoholics, your inebriated mind forces them as synonyms. That way you can close the book and grab that bottle and start drinking.

You need to go to an AA meeting.
 
Red Crow said:
The facts make you uncomfortable don't they?
Click to expand...

No...your alcoholism is just too absurd to even take seriously.

Calm down. Get a drink. Seems like you need one...you're going through withdrawals like Brett did yesterday on national TV.
 
LV426 said:
We're the ones who wanted an FBI investigation.

You're the ones who didn't want one.

So you're the ones who don't want due process.
Click to expand...

I never said I didn't want the investigation.

I said it's meaningless and this is more Leftist Obstruction.

If you supported due process ..... the hearing would have been enough .... in fact the hearing would have never happened.

But, that's not what the Fascist really want, now is it.
 
Red Crow said:
If you supported due process ..... the hearing would have been enough
Click to expand...

The hearing wasn't due process. A Congressional hearing is not due process. An investigation by law enforcement is. That's due process. You're the ones who also controlled how the hearing went; so if you're angry about how it wasn't due process, take that shit up with Grassley since he's the one who called the hearing and set the format, you friggin tool.
 
Nothing left but the crying and midterms, and the respect of the Scotus taking a kick in the nads thanks to the
hyper partisan accusations of the nominee Korsikoff
 
volsrock said:
He will be confirmed and it will make impeachment impossible
Click to expand...

Not necessarily.

If the FBI comes back with nothing, you can bet your ass that some investigative journalists will scour his past with a fine-toothed comb and I would not be the least bit surprised if they turned up something embarrassing and irrefutable.
 
Red Crow said:
But, that's not what the Fascist really want, now is it.
Click to expand...

You're adorable.

You hedge your argument literally from one sentence to the next, then attack me for something you're doing.

A Congressional hearing isn't due process. Due process would be an investigation and then a trial. That's what due process is.

Also, you shitheads control the Judiciary Committee....so you're the ones who called the hearing and set the format.

If due process is your concern, and not something you're just crying crocodile tears over, then your beef is with the head of the SJC, Chuck Grassley.

Otherwise stop your bitching and just go get a drink already, you lush.
 
LV426 said:
Welcome to the conversation!




So you don't want one.

So you flip-flop.

Wouldn't you want one to vindicate your belief that she's lying?

You are hedging within your own post; that belies insecurity.

I smell blood in the water now...
Click to expand...

Reality truly eludes you doesn't it?

It's expected.

You can't be a Leftist and be normal.

Doesn't work that away.
 
LV426 said:
The hearing wasn't due process. A Congressional hearing is not due process. An investigation by law enforcement is. That's due process. You're the ones who also controlled how the hearing went; so if you're angry about how it wasn't due process, take that shit up with Grassley since he's the one who called the hearing and set the format, you friggin tool.
Click to expand...

I noticed you didn't post the last sentence in my comment.

You extremist are all so disingenuous.
 
After the FBI investigates and reports back with nothing, anyone who votes against his confirmation has put politics above facts.
 
LV426 said:
No she didn't.

He did, though. He lied about being able to legally drink at 17 when the drinking age when he was 17 was 21.

So that was a lie.

Look, I don't think Brett is capable of making it through the day without getting drunk. I think he needs to be drunk because he simply doesn't know what it's like to live a day sober. That defensiveness and dependency was on full display yesterday.

Confront any alcoholic and they will respond exactly like him. Ever watch "Intervention"? Do yourself a favor.
Click to expand...

But you believe 4 drunken sluts?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top