If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[Uncensored2008]

And yet the funny thing is I have clearly used them more than you have ever used your brain.

Clearly not so. Ignorant trolling is all you can do. I understand - book learning is hard....

 

[domer76]

@Diesel made me laugh out loud today. I don’t know why, but his choice of one word did it.

Instead of asking “What in the fuck are you talking about?”, he added one word - “actual”.

“What in the ACTUAL fuck….” just has so much more punch to it that I had to chuckle.

It’s the small things, ya know…

 

[Cypress]

As least some form of higher education. Since he can't comprehend the difference, this also tells me he has mental acuity issues.

The fact that Perry/Gmark is constantly using different aliases and sock puppets, and then lies about it, is a tell that there is something abnormal about him

The fact he lies so much in order to one-up others, especially you, indicates he has low self-esteem...which is common among a person with mental acuity issues.

Using sock puppets, lying about a geochem PhD, and festering in resentment about me is off the edge of the map. It ain't normal!

It goes with the common human philosophy "if you can't be better than someone, then work to bring them down to your level". This is why, IMO, Perry constantly stalks you and seeks to both belittle you and attempts to appear better educated than you.

I would estimate 80 to 90 percent of his contributions to this board somehow involve me, lol

I suspect the reason he doesn't do the same to me is because I refuse to put up with his bullshit. I'm more than happy to jump into the gutter with him then hold his head underwater. LOL

Perry used to try to fight dirty against you, like linking you covertly to the pedophiles Prince Andrew and Paul Gauguin, but your posts eventually drove him bonkers and he begged the mods to put you on permanent ignore

 

[gmark77]

I'm so mad that Gmark figured out I'm a frantic googler that's all I'm going to talk about now!

ftfy, Cy. Now stamp those widdle feet.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

The fact that Perry/Gmark is constantly using different aliases and sock puppets, and then lies about it, is a tell that there is something abnormal about him

Using sock puppets, lying about a geochem PhD, and festering in resentment about me is off the edge of the map. It ain't normal!

I would estimate 80 to 90 percent of his contributions to this board somehow involve me, lol

Perry used to try to fight dirty against you, like linking you covertly to the pedophiles Prince Andrew and Paul Gauguin, but your posts eventually drove him bonkers and he begged the mods to put you on permanent ignore

Him tying me to the pedophile Prince Andrew was weird. Not the behavior of a "PhD", but very much the behavior of a 40-year-old retard.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Clearly not so. Ignorant trolling is all you can do. I understand - book learning is hard....

Ignorant troll says what?

 

[Into the Night]

Perry, would you even post here if you didn't have my threads to lurk, and my posts to read and respond to?

It seems not. If somebody were to investigate your last 200 posts, I bet 90 percent of them would involve me in some way.

Craving for attention, Cyborg?

 

[Into the Night]

No, you fucking idiot. I said Christian beliefs are irrational.

Why?

That's an objective word.

No, it's a subjective word.

There was no hate, demeaning, or hostility involved in a single thing I said (until I called you a fucking idiot right here). You either have a guilty conscience or are self defensive. Either way, you're a misguided soul.

See the first sentence of your post, liar.

Look, bitch, I denied it because I didn't do it. You are not equipped to rewrite reality or assign intentions to my posts that didn't exist.

Buzzword fallacy. Go learn what 'reality' means.

I was a Catholic for 20 years and have studied religion my entire life. You need to stop making false assumptions about me because you're hurt about an offense that I never presented to a religion that you pretend not to belong to. Why is your asshole so clenched about Christianity but not any other religion? To me, they all have equivalent worth or worthlessness. A person does not need to subscribe to a brainwashed religion in order to commune with a higher spirit -- if one or more of them exist. I am more than open to the possibility of a deity, but she has never bothered to present herself to me. Nor to any other person in the entire history of humanity. Think about what that means.

It means your aren't a Catholic, and not even a Christian.

I never said a single anti-Christian thing.

You just did!

I actually had no problem with you ever in this forum until this exchange. I have discovered that you are not a completely thinking person and that you insist on mischaracterizing other people's posts in order to argue a point they never made. You are awful at debating and dishonest about who you are. Your personality crisis needs a therapist, not an online political board.

That isn't proof of a god. That's all I'm saying. *That* is the agnostic position. You are a theist, not an agnostic.

Not the meaning of agnostic.

Own it and stop wasting other people's time with your disingenuousness. Just because you don't understand math (the word you continue to misspell, by the way, is "mathematical") does not mean there is a god. You possess an irrational belief, and that isn't an insult. It's an observation of fact.

Yet you throw insults in this very post.
Go learn what 'fact' means. It does NOT mean 'Universal Truth' or 'proof'.

 

[Into the Night]

I asked *you* if *you* are agnostic. I didn't write you off until you accused me of being anti-Christian simply because I said that a belief in god is irrational.

To make such statement is anti-Christian.
It is also denying logic.

You have some deep-rooted psychological issues revolving this topic that need to be addressed outside the board.

Psychoquackery.

 

[Into the Night]

Would Christianity exist without the written stories and accounts of Christ?

Yes.

That is a really stupid question.

Of course if Christ hadn't existed and hadn't been documented, Christianity would not exist.

What kind of a stupid "gotcha" point is that?

Reversal fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

Perry is a proven liar who claims to have a PhD in GeoChem and changes his socks as often as Asshat Zombie. I don't trust habitual liars, bullshitters and perverse stalkers.

You can't blame your problems on anybody else, Sybil.

 

[Into the Night]

Irrational is not an insult.

No, but you are denying logic again.

Jesus christ, get over yourself. A belief in a god is irrational. Period. Deal with it.

Denial of logic.

You are not a sane person. I'm not even going to address the rest of your rant.

Insult and Stone argument ignored.

 

[Into the Night]

Yep.

All complex systems develop and refine over time. Even primitive religions such as Hinduism develop mythology across generations.



Moronic posts are by definition "stupid." Your post was abysmally stupid.

Bigotry is not wisdom.



After all, you are the greatest being in the universe and none can equal you...

Atheists are hilarious - so arrogant, so ignorant.



You spewed bigotry - I called you out because your bigotry was stupid - REALLY stupid.

We get it, you hate Christians. Another Atheist Supremacist.

Atheists don't hate Christians.
They are not supremacist either.

The Church of No God is a fundamentalist style religion.

 

[Into the Night]

I wish you didn't write such stupid shit.

{I would dearly love to meet a person who, without ever hearing of the Bible or any details of Christianity, who could come up with the concepts behind Christianity without reliance on the Bible or Christian writings. Just from "first principles".}

Dumbfuckery beyond the pale - but you go ahead and pretend it's logically sound.

It is logically sound.

 

[Diesel]

It is among rational people. LOL

Irrational = illogical.

That's a you and a Cypress problem. I didn't call anyone or anything irrational as an insult. A belief in God is irrational. That's a simple statement of fact.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

That's a you and a Cypress problem. I didn't call anyone or anything irrational as an insult. A belief in God is irrational. That's a simple statement of fact.

What, specifically, is my problem, Diesel? The fact some people are so angry and misguided they don't know the difference between a comment about a subject and a personal attack? Why is that my problem? They're idiots. It'd be best if they took a bunch of fentanyl and freed the rest of us to live in peace.

 

[Cypress]

That's a you and a Cypress problem. I didn't call anyone or anything irrational as an insult. A belief in God is irrational. That's a simple statement of fact.

It's not a statement of fact. It's your opinion.

Everything that has an origin has a cause.​

​

Something does not come from nothing.​

​

Rational mathematical design does not come from random inanimate chance.​

​

Therefore, the universe is the creation of some purposeful and rational organizing entity.​

^^ That is a perfectly rational logical syllogism.

It doesn't mean it's true, but it's not irrational.

 

[Diesel]

Try calling your wife or husband irrational when having a heated discussion.

I don't know why you're having such a hard time understanding this. I don't care if you feel offended because I called a belief in God irrational. That's an objective term with a definition. I used it properly. You can't assign me an intention I never had. If you want to be upset, help yourself.

That's your opinion. My opinion is that belief in some type of god or higher power can be rational.

And that is insane.

I'm not the one who wanted to seriously discuss that animals have religion. That was you.

That's as crazy as any Christian, Jewish, or Buddhist belief.

You're an idiot. I never tried to "seriously discuss that animals have religion" and I'm bored and tired of your compulsive lying. I made an analogy that flew right over your head.

 

[Diesel]

I would have been very offended if a colleague at work called me irrational.

Were you acting irrationally? If not, then you can refute the claim. If yes, then you're a pussy and need to own the logical challenges of your beliefs.

 

[Cypress]

Were you acting irrationally? If not, then you can refute the claim. If yes, then you're a pussy and need to own the logical challenges of your beliefs.

Please try calling your clients and boss irrational if you want to test this.

But you also crossed a line by making judgments about me based just on the gossip of a known liar and sock puppet.

I've seen plenty of derogatory things written about you by your message board rivals, but I never gave it any credence or traction.