If God were real, you wouldn’t need a book

[Into the Night]

You can create a paradox just by claiming it.

I did not create the paradox, Void. YOU DID. You cannot clear a paradox by denying it!

 

[Into the Night]

Iron rage is a general reference to a period in history when man was lacking much information about the world around him and created God's accordingly.

And God, as you described it, could prove itself.

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

I don't need to prove God's don't exist anymore than I need to prove astrology is fake.

Negative proof fallacy.

Wrong.

Lies.

Argument of the Stone fallacies.

I don't need to disprove what has never been proven.

Negative proof fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

You need to prove what you affirmatively assert, and if you affirmatively assert the negation of another theory, you need to prove that.

That proof can only be done as a positive proof, which is not possible.

 

[Monad Portal]

Nope. The Old Testament began long before the iron age.

No such description in the Bible. You are still deluded.

It is not possible to prove any god or gods exist.
It is not possible to prove no god or gods exist.
Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Attempted negative proof fallacy.

Attempted negative proof fallacy. You cannot make any evidence just disappear. Evidence is not quantity.

Your word games won't work.

why don't you just shut the fuck up.

 

[IBDaMann]

That proof can only be done as a positive proof, which is not possible.

It is possible to prove nonexistence. I don't think anyone on this board knows how to do that, though.

 

[Monad Portal]

It is possible to prove nonexistence. I don't think anyone on this board knows how to do that, though.

no it isn't.

I call your bluff, tard.

 

[Cypress]

Don't get angry with me!!!

IBDumbass tries to claim the universe is totally disorganized, disorderly, and purely random...

...even though given the right amount of information we can use math to predict arbitrarily far into the future and the past the precise trajectory, position, and momentum of planets, stars, galaxies, comets, asteroids. Because they are imbued with mathematical laws and principles.

 

[ZenMode]

I did not create the paradox, Void. YOU DID. You cannot clear a paradox by denying it!

You still can't create a paradox by claiming one exists.

 

[ZenMode]

Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism).

It's not a circular argument. It's a statement and separately a response to your claim.

Negative proof fallacy.

Nope. Saying there is insufficient evidence isn't a negative proof. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Argument of the Stone fallacies.

Negative proof fallacy.

I don't need to disprove that which has never been proven.

 

[Into the Night]

why don't you just shut the fuck up.

I see you still haven't learned. I guess you're incapable of it.

 

[Into the Night]

no it isn't.

I call your bluff, tard.

Yes it is. I guess you have no idea how to conduct such a proof.

 

[Monad Portal]

Yes it is. I guess you have no idea how to conduct such a proof.

absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, butt fucker.

and I was talking to Ibdamann.

 

[Into the Night]

IBDumbass tries to claim the universe is totally disorganized, disorderly, and purely random...

It is.

YOU'RE trying to claim all sorts of false equivalencies and redefinitions. These are fallacies.

...even though given the right amount of information we can use math to predict arbitrarily far into the future and the past the precise trajectory, position, and momentum of planets, stars, galaxies, comets, asteroids. Because they are imbued with mathematical laws and principles.

The Universe is not random equations.
The Universe is not a planet, star, galaxy, comet, or asteroid.
Redefinition fallacy (Universe<->mathematics).

The Universe is unorganized.

 

[Into the Night]

You still can't create a paradox by claiming one exists.

You cannot resolve any of your paradoxes by denying them.

 

[Into the Night]

It's not a circular argument.

Lile.

It's a statement and separately a response to your claim.

Nope. It's a circular argument. I am not trying to prove anything.

Nope. Saying there is insufficient evidence isn't a negative proof. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Circular argument fallacy (fundamentalism). You cannot make any evidence just disappear. Evidence is not a quantity.

I don't need to disprove that which has never been proven.

Negative proof fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, butt fucker.

and I was talking to Ibdamann.

YARP

 

[Monad Portal]

Im a stoopid cum bucket.

 

[IBDaMann]

no it isn't. I call your bluff, tard.

Have you ever heard of Fermat's Last Theorem? You know, the one that proves the nonexistence of an integer solution to A^n + B^n = C^n for n>2 ?

That's just one example. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

 

[Monad Portal]

Have you ever heard of Fermat's Last Theorem? You know, the one that proves the nonexistence of an integer solution to A^n + B^n = C^n for n>2 ?

That's just one example. Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.

nonexistence of an integer solution.

is not the same as just nonexistence of something or not.

we know fractions exist.

this is seems something similar to our circle and line tests.

it seems cool though.

and it really its above my grade.

but just as you explain it, it seems to not fulfill our conditions.

 

[IBDaMann]

IBDumbass tries to observe the universe is totally disorganized, disorderly, and purely random...

FTFY. You still haven't shown a single randomness test that the universe fails

...even though given the right amount of information

You don't have enough information.

we can use math to predict arbitrarily far into the future

You're back to being a multiple-personality schizophrenic, I see. Unfortunately, none of you can use math at all.

and the past

... but you can only project under the assumption of zero collisions, and you don't know what collisions actually occurred when and where.