ZenMode
Well-known member
Oh, I know. I just keep thinking that you'll come to your sense and stop defending the genocide of children at the hands of you "all-loving god".RQAA
Guess not.
Last edited:
Oh, I know. I just keep thinking that you'll come to your sense and stop defending the genocide of children at the hands of you "all-loving god".RQAA
No, you defend the genocide of children at the hands of your "all-loving god" and it's laughably embarrassing.Ummm, I don't defend Pharaoh's behavior. What he did during that time period was wrong.
Right, so you're putting at the feet of children to, what, release the Israelite themselves? Should the children go fight Pharoah and his army so their God won't slaughter them?RQAA, but I'll go through some relevant info again for anyone who hasn't followed along.
1- Pharaoh (Egypt) had earlier ordered all Israelite newborn males be killed. (See Exodus 1 for details)
2- God repeatedly warned Pharaoh what would happen if he kept refusing to let the Israelites go free.
3- God was very patient with Pharaoh, giving him multiple chances to avoid the consequences.
4- God only spared the Israelite firstborns so long as they had faith in him and put lamb's blood on their doorposts. (IOW, they likewise had to obey or face the consequences)
5- God acted consistently with his Genesis 12 covenant.
6- It did not pleasure God for the Egyptian firstborns to die, but the continued misbehavior by Pharaoh (Egypt) left him no choice but to respond appropriately (since he is a JUST God).
7- "Firstborn" does not necessarily mean "child" (or "infant/toddler").
8- Some Egyptians chose to fear the word of the LORD and did as he said, so they were likewise spared from the warned plague(s). (e.g. Exodus 9)
9- How could a "just"/"righteous" God turn a blind eye on the oppression of the Israelites?
10- There are many other accounts in The Bible where God is likewise "just" towards the Israelites whenever THEY sin.
11- "For the wages of sin is death" (but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our LORD).
A "firstborn" isn't necessarily a "2 week old" or a "2 year old".
Young children of only a few years old are already old enough to understand the concept of "If you don't do this thing that I told you to do, then this other thing will happen as a result of your misconduct".
Explain precisely how matter, spacetime, and energy is "not" the universe
Every astronomy and cosmology class I took, book I've read, podcast I watched talks about the universe almost exclusively in terms of matter, spacetime, and energy.The Universe is not 'spacetime'!!!
the Lord.Every astronomy and cosmology class I took, book I've read, podcast I watched talks about the universe almost exclusively in terms of matter, spacetime, and energy.
Explain precisely what you think the universe is, leaving out any reference to or mention of matter, spacetime, and energy.
When did the universe's randomness become what I wanted? What I wanted was for you to point out which randomness tests the universe fails.ftfy...No matter how much your ego wants the universe to be purely random,
Now I remember, you don't know what a fact is, explaining why your post doesn't make much sense.unorganized, unpredictable, your emotions will never trump the facts.
It wasn't all that famous.Even Einstein famously said
You don't even know what he meant by that remark.the most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it's comprehensible.
You are the one insisting that the universe fails randomness tests yet won't say which ones. Are you claiming to know every collision.If you want to be honest with yourself,
There has never been a lawful/organized universe towards which I could be hostile.the reason you are so hostile to a lawful/organized universe
Did you really just write that? Have you always been this direct?is because you know it seems to potentially insinuate ...
I have never attempted to hold a conversation with a random dust cloud so I don't know how rational or witty one might be.an underlying rationality and agency.
No genocide of children occurred. Stop flailing around hyperbolically and stick to the Bible's account of what actually happened.No, you defend the genocide of children at the hands of your "all-loving god" and it's laughably embarrassing.
You very clearly didn't read through the points that I mentioned, choosing to still steamroll ahead with your "children" nonsense.Right, so you're putting at the feet of children to, what, release the Israelite themselves? Should the children go fight Pharoah and his army so their God won't slaughter them?
... then there wouldn't be such a thing as "free will"?You know, if your god had absolute control of his creation,
RQAA.why didn't he find an option to free the Jews without genocide of innocent children?
He is trying to deny the presence of evil.Ummm, I don't defend Pharaoh's behavior. What he did during that time period was wrong.
RQAA, but I'll go through some relevant info again for anyone who hasn't followed along.
1- Pharaoh (Egypt) had earlier ordered all Israelite newborn males be killed. (See Exodus 1 for details)
2- God repeatedly warned Pharaoh what would happen if he kept refusing to let the Israelites go free.
3- God was very patient with Pharaoh, giving him multiple chances to avoid the consequences.
4- God only spared the Israelite firstborns so long as they had faith in him and put lamb's blood on their doorposts. (IOW, they likewise had to obey or face the consequences)
5- God acted consistently with his Genesis 12 covenant.
6- It did not pleasure God for the Egyptian firstborns to die, but the continued misbehavior by Pharaoh (Egypt) left him no choice but to respond appropriately (since he is a JUST God).
7- "Firstborn" does not necessarily mean "child" (or "infant/toddler").
8- Some Egyptians chose to fear the word of the LORD and did as he said, so they were likewise spared from the warned plague(s). (e.g. Exodus 9)
9- How could a "just"/"righteous" God turn a blind eye on the oppression of the Israelites?
10- There are many other accounts in The Bible where God is likewise "just" towards the Israelites whenever THEY sin.
11- "For the wages of sin is death" (but the gift of God is eternal life through Christ Jesus our LORD).
A "firstborn" isn't necessarily a "2 week old" or a "2 year old".
Young children of only a few years old are already old enough to understand the concept of "If you don't do this thing that I told you to do, then this other thing will happen as a result of your misconduct".
And you continue your mindless chant. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RAAAOh, I know. I just keep thinking that you'll come to your sense and stop defending the genocide of children at the hands of you "all-loving god".
Guess not.
More mindless chant. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RAAA.No, you defend the genocide of children at the hands of your "all-loving god" and it's laughably embarrassing.
Right, so you're putting at the feet of children to, what, release the Israelite themselves? Should the children go fight Pharoah and his army so their God won't slaughter them?
You know, if your god had absolute control of his creation, why didn't he find an option to free the Jews without genocide of innocent children?
Pick the word you like that reference the mass killing of the first born, some number of which will absolutely be infants, toddlers, etcNo genocide of children occurred. Stop flailing around hyperbolically and stick to the Bible's account of what actually happened.
I did and it still comes down to your god killing innocent children, apparently because Pharoah didn't free the Israelites.You very clearly didn't read through the points that I mentioned, choosing to still steamroll ahead with your "children" nonsense.
Right, so you all-loving, gracious God orchestrated a situation whereby he'd have to kill large numbers of innocent children. I mean, he's god. Why didn't he just put Pharoah and his army to sleep or hurl them into a nearby lake while they were sleeping rather than killing all the children?... then there wouldn't be such a thing as "free will"?
Oh I know and it still makes zero sense that you'd condone the slaughter of children.RQAA.
The fact that you can't muster an answer doesn't make anything mindless.More mindless chant. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RAAA.
The Universe is not a class. The Universe is not 'spacetime'. The Universe is not organized. Matter is not organized.Every astronomy and cosmology class I took, book I've read, podcast I watched talks about the universe almost exclusively in terms of matter, spacetime, and energy.
RQAA, but I will answer it AGAIN. Read it this timeExplain precisely what you think the universe is, leaving out any reference to or mention of matter, spacetime, and energy.
A curse, that Pharaoh place upon his own people.Pick the word you like that reference the mass killing of the first born, some number of which will absolutely be infants, toddlers, etc
God can kill anyone He wants anytime He wants to. He has full control over his own creation. Death is not permanent, thanks to the gift of Jesus Christ and God.I did and it still comes down to your god killing innocent children, apparently because Pharoah didn't free the Israelites.
Nope. EVERYONE on Earth is part of God's creation. Pharaoh was psychotic. He wanted to kill the first born of every Jew. He does not have that authority.That's not psychotic at all.
No. Pharaoh did. God is not Pharoah.Right, so you all-loving, gracious God orchestrated a situation whereby he'd have to kill large numbers of innocent children.
God destroyed Pharoah's army.I mean, he's god. Why didn't he just put Pharoah and his army
'First born' does not mean children.to sleep or hurl them into a nearby lake while they were sleeping rather than killing all the children?
I don't, moron. I never agreed with Pharaoh's edict to kill babies. Pharaoh brought his own curses upon his own people.Oh I know and it still makes zero sense that you'd condone the slaughter of children.
Before we move on with this thought (even though it's already been addressed), how old do you suppose ALL the Hebrew newborn males were (that the Egyptians were killing per Pharaoh's order at the end of Exodus 1)?Pick the word you like that reference the mass killing of the first born, some number of which will absolutely be infants, toddlers, etc
Before we move on with this thought (even though it's already been addressed), was Pharaoh already "killing innocent Hebrew children"?I did and it still comes down to your god killing innocent children, apparently because Pharoah didn't free the Israelites.
God's actions were not psychotic. They were perfectly just. Pharaoh's actions, on the other hand, were psychotic.That's not psychotic at all.
What "innocent children"? The Hebrew newborn males who were being killed by the Egyptians?Right, so you all-loving, gracious God orchestrated a situation whereby he'd have to kill large numbers of innocent children. I mean, he's god. Why didn't he just put Pharoah and his army to sleep or hurl them into a nearby lake while they were sleeping rather than killing all the children?
Oh I know and it still makes zero sense that you'd condone the slaughter of children.
you're a mentally diseased pschotic mass murderer.A curse, that Pharaoh place upon his own people.
God can kill anyone He wants anytime He wants to. He has full control over his own creation. Death is not permanent, thanks to the gift of Jesus Christ and God.
Nope. EVERYONE on Earth is part of God's creation. Pharaoh was psychotic. He wanted to kill the first born of every Jew. He does not have that authority.
No. Pharaoh did. God is not Pharoah.
God destroyed Pharoah's army.
'First born' does not mean children.
PHARAOH wanted to murder babies.
I don't, moron. I never agreed with Pharaoh's edict to kill babies. Pharaoh brought his own curses upon his own people.
Playing word games with scripture like you do does not invalidate either the scripture or God.

Right....and since he DID kill innocent children, he's a homicidal psychopath. I mean, if any human did what he did, they'd be viewed the same way.A curse, that Pharaoh place upon his own people.
God can kill anyone He wants anytime He wants to. He has full control over his own creation. Death is not permanent, thanks to the gift of Jesus Christ and God.
Right. God could have stopped that, too, just as he could stop all the sexual/physical abuse of children the world. He doesn't. He just watches.Nope. EVERYONE on Earth is part of God's creation. Pharaoh was psychotic. He wanted to kill the first born of every Jew. He does not have that authority.
Nope. God is good. He chose to do what he did.No. Pharaoh did. God is not Pharoah.
But killed the children first.God destroyed Pharoah's army.
Some absolutely were.'First born' does not mean children.
Well, it's a good thing God stopped him...so he could turn around and kill the other babies.PHARAOH wanted to murder babies.
I never agreed with God's edict to kill babies.I don't, moron. I never agreed with Pharaoh's edict to kill babies.
He made God kill all the babies?Pharaoh brought his own curses upon his own people.
I'm not playing anything. Just telling you what your God did.... because he apparently only likes certain dead babies.Playing word games with scripture like you do does not invalidate either the scripture or God.
Probably a variety of ages, just like the Israelite children were a variety of ages.Before we move on with this thought (even though it's already been addressed), how old do you suppose ALL the Hebrew newborn males were (that the Egyptians were killing per Pharaoh's order at the end of Exodus 1)?
God could have stopped that, too...but chose not to. Would you, if you were God, stand by and watch that happen? I wouldn't.Before we move on with this thought (even though it's already been addressed), was Pharaoh already "killing innocent Hebrew children"?
Maybe kill Pharaoh rather than the children?God's actions were not psychotic. They were perfectly just. Pharaoh's actions, on the other hand, were psychotic.
The ones killed on Passover who had absolutely nothing to do with Pharoah's actions?What "innocent children"? The Hebrew newborn males who were being killed by the Egyptians?
After he slaughtered all the first born on Passover, of course. After that he didn't condone it.I don't condone such slaughter, and neither did God, which is why he eventually issued just judgement upon the Egyptians who were doing it.
RQAAThe fact that you can't muster an answer doesn't make anything mindless.
Pharoah? Yes he was.Right....and since he DID kill innocent children, he's a homicidal psychopath.
And that's how I view him.I mean, if any human did what he did, they'd be viewed the same way.
God does not rule by force. That is Satan's teaching.Right. God could have stopped that, too, just as he could stop all the sexual/physical abuse of children the world. He doesn't. He just watches.
Pharaoh is not God.Nope. God is good. He chose to do what he did.
Pharaoh is not God.But killed the children first.
So? Pharaoh is not God.Some absolutely were.
What 'other babies'?Well, it's a good thing God stopped him...so he could turn around and kill the other babies.
Pharaoh is not God.I never agreed with God's edict to kill babies.
Pharaoh is not God.He made God kill all the babies?
Lie.I'm not playing anything.
Pharaoh is not God.Just telling you what your God did.... because he apparently only likes certain dead babies.