If homosexuality is wrong,

Cancel8

Canceled
why aren't those who condemn it in the military condemning this:

WikiLeaks: Texas Company Helped Pimp Little Boys to Stoned Afghan Cops

Another international conflict, another horrific taxpayer-funded sex scandal for DynCorp, the private security contractor tasked with training the Afghan police.


http://nation.foxnews.com/dyncorp/2...ny-helped-pimp-little-boys-stoned-afghan-cops

http://www.realsportszone.com/wikileaks-dyncorp-pimps-young-afghan-boys-for-bacha-bazi/

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2010/12/wikileaks_texas_company_helped.php

You'd think the champions of sexual morality would applaud Wikileaks for exposing this scandal.

Instead, I see a "don't care" attitude about the government's persecution of Julian Assange, and outrage over the imminent repeal of DADT.
 
why aren't those who condemn it in the military condemning this:

WikiLeaks: Texas Company Helped Pimp Little Boys to Stoned Afghan Cops

Another international conflict, another horrific taxpayer-funded sex scandal for DynCorp, the private security contractor tasked with training the Afghan police.


http://nation.foxnews.com/dyncorp/2...ny-helped-pimp-little-boys-stoned-afghan-cops

http://www.realsportszone.com/wikileaks-dyncorp-pimps-young-afghan-boys-for-bacha-bazi/

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2010/12/wikileaks_texas_company_helped.php

You'd think the champions of sexual morality would applaud Wikileaks for exposing this scandal.

Instead, I see a "don't care" attitude about the government's persecution of Julian Assange, and outrage over the imminent repeal of DADT.

So, why don't you care?
 
If homosexuality is wrong,....

As the song goes......

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWAUCVbnDUg&feature=related"]YouTube - Luther Ingram - If lovin you is wrong i don't wanna be right[/ame]
 
why aren't those who condemn it in the military condemning this:

WikiLeaks: Texas Company Helped Pimp Little Boys to Stoned Afghan Cops

Another international conflict, another horrific taxpayer-funded sex scandal for DynCorp, the private security contractor tasked with training the Afghan police.


http://nation.foxnews.com/dyncorp/2...ny-helped-pimp-little-boys-stoned-afghan-cops

http://www.realsportszone.com/wikileaks-dyncorp-pimps-young-afghan-boys-for-bacha-bazi/

http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2010/12/wikileaks_texas_company_helped.php

You'd think the champions of sexual morality would applaud Wikileaks for exposing this scandal.

Instead, I see a "don't care" attitude about the government's persecution of Julian Assange, and outrage over the imminent repeal of DADT.
Still at it, huh ?
Theres that nonsense about poor Julian being persecuted again...

So you think that the US governments' investigating a crime AND Assange's nonsense about blaming the US for his rape charges constitutes "persecution"....?
Really....is that all ya got ? An ongoing investigation and Julies claims constitute persecution ?:palm:
 
Still at it, huh ?
Theres that nonsense about poor Julian being persecuted again...

So you think that the US governments' investigating a crime AND Assange's nonsense about blaming the US for his rape charges constitutes "persecution"....?
Really....is that all ya got ? An ongoing investigation and Julies claims constitute persecution ?:palm:


I thought you didn't care.
 
:rofl:You have me convinced....that "persecution" has got to cease.....

What gave you the idea that anyone wants to convince you of anything?

Your individual belief or disbelief makes no difference.

But then, perhaps you've been distracted.

After all, earlier you said you can "hardly wait to see a couple of big bad-ass Marines kissing and hugging in the next parade, maybe even some serious ass grabbing, and some cutey sailors smooching it up at the next Army/Navy game.... its gonna be a blast".

Did you find some military porno sites?
 
:rofl:You have me convinced....that "persecution" has got to cease.....

Your sarcasm is duly noted.

But I also notice you still haven't given a legitimate reason for DADT to be kept. We all know you dislike the repeal. But, like most who opposed the repeal, you cannot given any reasons for your opposition.
 
Your sarcasm is duly noted.

But I also notice you still haven't given a legitimate reason for DADT to be kept. We all know you dislike the repeal. But, like most who opposed the repeal, you cannot given any reasons for your opposition.

Good point. I also noticed that "Bravo" apparently has no problem with his tax dollars subsidizing gay rape. After all, that was the focus of this thread until he came along, and he didn't address that, either.
 
What gave you the idea that anyone wants to convince you of anything?

Your individual belief or disbelief makes no difference.

But then, perhaps you've been distracted.

After all, earlier you said you can "hardly wait to see a couple of big bad-ass Marines kissing and hugging in the next parade, maybe even some serious ass grabbing, and some cutey sailors smooching it up at the next Army/Navy game.... its gonna be a blast".

Did you find some military porno sites?

Good point. I also noticed that "Bravo" apparently has no problem with his tax dollars subsidizing gay rape. After all, that was the focus of this thread until he came along, and he didn't address that, either.
Don't stop now turkey, you're on a roll....really, I almost smiled.....

but don't quit your day job.....

"tax dollars subsidizing gay rape"....ha...whats that all about?
Haha...in you own words, " he didn't address that, either."

Still think I can see the reaction of fellow troopers from a porn site?
No, we're gonna have to wait....
I'm lookin' forward to it...its gonna be entertaining.......

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if you started going on about the chronology of the posts soon.....lol.....:palm:
 
Your sarcasm is duly noted.

But I also notice you still haven't given a legitimate reason for DADT to be kept. We all know you dislike the repeal. But, like most who opposed the repeal, you cannot given any reasons for your opposition.
The real question is....will this DADT stuff be the last Democratic "fuck you" to America for awhile or will they pass the "Dream Act" too....????
 
Don't stop now turkey, you're on a roll....really, I almost smiled.....

but don't quit your day job.....

"tax dollars subsidizing gay rape"....ha...whats that all about?
Haha...in you own words, " he didn't address that, either."

Still think I can see the reaction of fellow troopers from a porn site?
No, we're gonna have to wait....
I'm lookin' forward to it...its gonna be entertaining.......

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if you started going on about the chronology of the posts soon.....lol.....:palm:

For someone who doesn't give a rat's ass about the subject, you are very prolific.

So where will you and your "fellow troopers" (in the Navy?) be when you "see a couple of big bad-ass Marines kissing and hugging in the next parade, maybe even some serious ass grabbing, and some cutey sailors smooching it up at the next Army/Navy game"?

Not that I'm judging, it just seems odd that someone who thinks watching homosexual behavior is "a blast" would be so opposed to the repeal of DADT.

No outrage left for DynCorp's little exercise in gay rights?
 
DynCorp disputes WikiLeaks allegations

A salacious, scandalous story involving allegations of child sex that has unfolded on blogs and websites over the last two weeks seems to implicate DynCorp International, a major Fort Worth employer.

The problem, say both DynCorp and the U.S. State Department, is that the story is exaggerated and the worst parts of it untrue.

The recent release of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks prompted the reports. Among the cables is one that discusses a meeting with Afghan Minister of Interior Hanif Atmar, who wanted the U.S. to help quash a possible newspaper article about foreign employees of DynCorp hiring "dancing boys" to perform at a party.

Britain's Guardian newspaper published an article Dec. 2 about the memo and the minister's meeting with embassy officials. The article tied the reported party to "a long [Afghan] tradition of young boys dressing up as girls and dancing for men ... that sometimes crosses the line into child abuse with Afghans keeping the boys as possessions."

From there, several websites caught on to the story.

"U.S. Contractor Threw 'Dancing Boys' Party for Afghan Police," was Slate's headline. The Houston Press, prominently pointing out DynCorp's operations in Fort Worth, wrote: "Texas Company Helped Pimp Little Boys to Stoned Afghan Cops."

It's not the first time DynCorp employees overseas have been linked to a sex scandal.

"It's Deja Vu for DynCorp All Over Again," headlined The Huffington Post, referring to a scandal in the late '90s. DynCorp employees in Bosnia were accused of being involved in prostitution and procuring young girls for sex.

In the Afghanistan case, both DynCorp and the State Department say what occurred was far less sinister than portrayed in such reports.

According to a detailed statement provided by DynCorp spokeswoman Ashley Burke, a going-away party for a departing Afghan employee was held at the regional police training center in Kunduz. The party organizer, a local employee, hired "a 17-year-old local dancer who performed at ... weddings and other celebrations, to perform a traditional Afghan dance."

Shortly after the dancing began, a DynCorp manager "recognizing that the situation was culturally insensitive ... stopped the performance," according to the statement.

The company conducted its own investigation of the matter, "determined that the leadership of the team exhibited poor judgment and were subsequently terminated. That is the whole story; no alcohol or drugs were involved, or other illegal behaviors occurred."

The State Department concurred, saying there were no drugs, no alcohol and no boys procured for sex.

"There was no evidence of any of that," said Susan Pittman, spokeswoman for the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement.

Both the bureau and the Office of the Inspector General investigated the matter, Pittman said, including reviewing videos of the party.

For several days after the leaked memo was published, DynCorp's Burke said, none of the online media writing about it bothered to contact the company or the State Department. Eventually, one blog, TalkingPointsMemo, did and reported the company and State Department side of the story.


http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/12/17/2713558/dyncorp-disputes-wikileaks-allegations.html


Another homo story shot down in flames.
 
DynCorp disputes WikiLeaks allegations

A salacious, scandalous story involving allegations of child sex that has unfolded on blogs and websites over the last two weeks seems to implicate DynCorp International, a major Fort Worth employer.

The problem, say both DynCorp and the U.S. State Department, is that the story is exaggerated and the worst parts of it untrue.

The recent release of thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables by WikiLeaks prompted the reports. Among the cables is one that discusses a meeting with Afghan Minister of Interior Hanif Atmar, who wanted the U.S. to help quash a possible newspaper article about foreign employees of DynCorp hiring "dancing boys" to perform at a party.

Britain's Guardian newspaper published an article Dec. 2 about the memo and the minister's meeting with embassy officials. The article tied the reported party to "a long [Afghan] tradition of young boys dressing up as girls and dancing for men ... that sometimes crosses the line into child abuse with Afghans keeping the boys as possessions."

From there, several websites caught on to the story.

"U.S. Contractor Threw 'Dancing Boys' Party for Afghan Police," was Slate's headline. The Houston Press, prominently pointing out DynCorp's operations in Fort Worth, wrote: "Texas Company Helped Pimp Little Boys to Stoned Afghan Cops."

It's not the first time DynCorp employees overseas have been linked to a sex scandal.

"It's Deja Vu for DynCorp All Over Again," headlined The Huffington Post, referring to a scandal in the late '90s. DynCorp employees in Bosnia were accused of being involved in prostitution and procuring young girls for sex.

In the Afghanistan case, both DynCorp and the State Department say what occurred was far less sinister than portrayed in such reports.

According to a detailed statement provided by DynCorp spokeswoman Ashley Burke, a going-away party for a departing Afghan employee was held at the regional police training center in Kunduz. The party organizer, a local employee, hired "a 17-year-old local dancer who performed at ... weddings and other celebrations, to perform a traditional Afghan dance."

Shortly after the dancing began, a DynCorp manager "recognizing that the situation was culturally insensitive ... stopped the performance," according to the statement.

The company conducted its own investigation of the matter, "determined that the leadership of the team exhibited poor judgment and were subsequently terminated. That is the whole story; no alcohol or drugs were involved, or other illegal behaviors occurred."

The State Department concurred, saying there were no drugs, no alcohol and no boys procured for sex.

"There was no evidence of any of that," said Susan Pittman, spokeswoman for the State Department's Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement.

Both the bureau and the Office of the Inspector General investigated the matter, Pittman said, including reviewing videos of the party.

For several days after the leaked memo was published, DynCorp's Burke said, none of the online media writing about it bothered to contact the company or the State Department. Eventually, one blog, TalkingPointsMemo, did and reported the company and State Department side of the story.


http://www.star-telegram.com/2010/12/17/2713558/dyncorp-disputes-wikileaks-allegations.html


Another homo story shot down in flames.

So because the perpetrators deny it, it's not true?

Then why is the government mulling charges against Julian Assange?
 
So because the perpetrators deny it, it's not true?

And yet when Julie claims the US is behind his sex crime accusations you have no problem saying the US is persecuting him
Julies claims mean its the truth?....Odd....



Then why is the government mulling charges against Julian Assange?

Because a crime has been committed....he is in possession of stolen goods....ie, a crime.
.
 
Back
Top