WinterBorn
Verified User
I didn't post any links.
My mistake. I clicked on my own links.
But feel free to post any you can find. Otherwise it is just your opinion vs the BBC, Fox News, The Seattle Times and the US Justice Dept.
I didn't post any links.
many sources are not actually reputable.I'll help you out here.
Sources reporting Ashli Babbit was shot in the left shoulder:
Cause of death determined for four in Capitol riot
WASHINGTON — Two civilians who died during the violent Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol died of natural causes, and a third succumbed to amphetamine intoxication, according to the District of Columbia medical examiner's office. A fourth person, 35-year-old...www.seattletimes.com
DC medical examiner confirms causes of death of 4 who died in Jan. 6 Capitol riot
The chief medical examiner in Washington, D.C., confirmed on Wednesday the causes and manners of death of four people who died during the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.www.fox23.com
Here are links showing Babbitt died at the hospital, not instantly on the floor:
Ashli Babbitt: The US veteran shot dead breaking into the Capitol
The 35 year old is one of five people who died amid an armed insurrection at the US Capitol.www.bbc.com
my viewings of CSPAN coverage at the time of the riots.
your news sources are bullshit and liars.
you're a neocon traitor dipshit.
it goes to the trustworthiness of your idiotic sources.Not what we are discussing here, now is it?
How many links do you need to believe that she was shot in the shoulder and died later at the hospital.
Of course, I welcome any links confirming your claims.
shot in the neck, died right there.Videos of it?
How did the videos show when she died?
How could you tell, from shaky video shot from 10 feet away, whether she was shot in the shoulder or the neck?
many sources are not actually reputable.
this is the argument to authority logical fallacy.
they both lie often.Fox News and the BBC are considered reputable.
But, again, please post any evidence you have. Watching video at the time is not evidence.
it goes to the trustworthiness of your idiotic sources.
they both lie often.
your impotent links to liars are also not evidence.
So Fox News, the BBC, and the US Justice Dept are not trustworthy.
But you, who watched it on tv, are a reputable source? LMAO!!
they're worse.They are far better sources than simply claiming you watched it on tv when it happened. That is ridiculously bad evidence.
shot in the neck, died right there.
correct.
also correct.
it was pretty steady and further away, but yes.So by watching a shaky video, shot from 10 feet away, you can tell exactly where she was shot?
And, if that is true, the sources I listed would have had to retract what they reported. Because surely other people would have seen the same video.
Laughably incorrect.Laughably incorrect.
they're worse.
you're a ridiculously dumb idiot.
it was pretty steady and further away, but yes.
media lie all the time without retracting it.
look boomer, operation mockingbird is a known and verified thing.
yes. it's you.If there is a ridiculously dumb idiot in this conversation, it is the one claiming their viewing of the incident on tv is a better source than professional news agencies.
And if that were true, you would not be the only person who saw the videos that would make that claim. And what I have claimed would have been called out by everyone who saw the video and the stories would have been retracted. They weren't.
Even the US Justice Dept agrees with what I posted.
I rarely hear people discuss the actual video.So how is it every other person who saw the video sees something different?
it's called vision. look into it, Blindo the Clown.How can you tell a should wound from a neck wound (it was obviously not high on the neck) from a video shot from more than 10 feet away?
How can you tell if she was dead before they took her to the hospital?