MAGA morons want a dictator, and they were just bullshitting us all those years they professed to be strict constitutional loyalists.Why did Congress pass the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, in which the Legislature gives some of its power to the Executive temporary powers to impose tariffs in a targeted way?
They want a dictator when The Felon is in charge, but otherwise...MAGA morons want a dictator, and they were just bullshitting us all those years they professed to be strict constitutional loyalists.
Correct, once a Democrat is president again, MAGAs will magically transform back into strict constitutionalists.They want a dictator when The Felon is in charge, but otherwise...
Veruca it is the same old MO with you.They cant even bring themselves to address this.
Where does the Constitution give the Executive Tariff power?Veruca it is the same old MO with you.
1) start a shit post
2) bemoan people not responding to it within 2 minutes of you posting
3) assume you have come up with some brilliant point nobody can refute and claim victory
OR
4) Get your ass handed to you and then run away pretending you never started the thread in the first place
Have you ever thought that maybe your topic is stupid and that you are stupid and people don't want to waste time with your shit posts? Have you ever thought of that? Or do you just think that everything that emanates from your fingertips is sheer brilliance? What podcast did you hear this from that gave you the idea to start this thread in the first place?
So you want to go with Option 4?Where does the Constitution give the Executive Tariff power?
Because Congress is intellectually and morally lazy.Why did Congress pass the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, in which the Legislature gives some of its power to the Executive temporary powers to impose tariffs in a targeted way?
None of that is from the Constitution... did you understand the question?So you want to go with Option 4?
Here you go Veruca. While the US Constitution does not give the power to tariff to the President, Congress has delegated it to be so three times.
a) Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (Section 232) - authorizes the President to impose tariffs or other trade restrictions if imports threaten national security
b) Trade Act of 1974 (Section 301) - empowers the President to impose tariffs or take other actions in response to unfair trade practices by other countries
c) International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) of 1977 - Grants the President broad authority to regulate commerce during a national emergency that threatens national security, foreign policy or the economy
Why did you only bring up the IEEPA in your shit post and not there other acts passed by Congress?
Were you not aware of them? Being deliberately misleading?
But it proves my point, the power is with CONGRESS unless they give it to the Executive, right?Because Congress is intellectually and morally lazy.
I had a lunch, but I am back... Why cant you provide any evidence where the Constitution gave the Executive power over tariffs?Ladies and Gentleman I give you Exhibit A
Jarod starts shit post. Complains people aren't responding. Then he gets his ass kicked. Then he runs away.
It is like clockwork
So are you saying that the only thing that anyone can do has to come straight from the Constitution? If it isn't explicitly in the US Constitution it shouldn't be done?None of that is from the Constitution... did you understand the question?
The power of the courts to decide questions of law is explicitly stated in Article 3.So are you saying that the only thing that anyone can do has to come straight from the Constitution? If it isn't explicitly in the US Constitution it shouldn't be done?
There was nothing explicit in the US Constitution saying the Supreme Court gets to interpret the US Constitution, but they gave themselves that power.
Are you sure you want to continue down this road Veruca? I know you think you landed on some unassailable talking point, but I don't think this is going to end the way you think it will
Read Article IIISo are you saying that the only thing that anyone can do has to come straight from the Constitution? If it isn't explicitly in the US Constitution it shouldn't be done?
There was nothing explicit in the US Constitution saying the Supreme Court gets to interpret the US Constitution, but they gave themselves that power.
Are you sure you want to continue down this road Veruca? I know you think you landed on some unassailable talking point, but I don't think this is going to end the way you think it will