"The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."
Does it explicitly state the interpretation of the US Constitution is the sole purview of the courts? You can't have it both ways Veruca. Either it is explicit or it is not. Those words do not exist.
So are you saying that the War Powers act is also unconstitutional?
Yes, as long as you believe the Constitution is law.
The War Powers Act is likely unconstitutional.
Point out where the exact words "The Supreme Court gets to interpret the Constitution" exist in the US Constitution. I will wait
That quote is not necessary, just like if I asked you to point out the exact words, "AR-15 cannot be banned."
So you are admitting I am right when I say that Trump has the power to impose tariffs. Just because it isn't in the Constitution doesn't mean he doesn't have the power if ti was granted by Congress which it was on three separate occasions. I humbly accept your concession.
the right to bear arms shall not be infringed
Congress got lazy and apathetic. By acknowledging their apathy and inability to find compromising and workable solutions, they decided it would be easier to let a single entity make a temporary decision
Trump has the right to impose tariffs via legislation granting him their power, under the limitations of that grant of power. The Court found that the law giving him limited authority to impose tariffs did not allow many of the ones he has recently tried to impose.
With limits, and the Court found that this situation did not fit within those limits.
yes, with limits, which is why I used the word 'temporary'
Because the majority of American voters put him in charge.
In charge or what? The Executive powers, yes I agree that is true. However, it has been determined by the Court that there particular tariffs are not part of his powers.
Did they really? What are those limitations? Can you enumerate them? Hell apparently you only knew of one law since that was all you posted
I did answer it. Just because you make a straw man argument to then tear down doesn't make you smart. We have covered this. Congress vested power in the President.
I cannot enumerate them, but the ruling is public and if you have interest in educating yourself you can expend the energy to read it.
Congress did not vest this power in the President according to the Court.