If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun

Cancel 2018. 3

<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun

anyone know who said this? and is this violent rhetoric? clearing the person is advocating the use of guns and if the topic was politics, then isn't this advocating the use of guns in politics?
 
Obama fires up Democrats: 'I want you to argue with them and get in their face'


maybe jarod misunderstood obama heated rhetoric. should we examine this?
 
If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun

anyone know who said this? and is this violent rhetoric? clearing the person is advocating the use of guns and if the topic was politics, then isn't this advocating the use of guns in politics?

DQ's brother. Why did you thumbs down this post?
 
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry. I’m angry,” Mr. Obama said


somebody wants people angry, maybe jarod misunderstood this, but got angry in the wrong....could obama have caused this?

i'm not blaming obama, i'm just trying to understand what happened just like the dems are

:awesome:
 
“We’re gonna punish our enemies and we’re gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us.” Obama to Latinos, October 2010


did the lunatic shooter listen to this and decide to punish his enemies? should we analyze this statement?
 
Sean Connery.

Man, I just got a look at the "new" board - you've gone bananas on this issue. You have started more threads than Jarod on a good day...
 
Sean Connery.

Man, I just got a look at the "new" board - you've gone bananas on this issue. You have started more threads than Jarod on a good day...

and once again, onceler does not condemn the rhetoric or the speaker, does not want to even consider it, and instead its much better to attack the messenger

keep it up onceler, it only proves you're lying when you say you condemn both sides, you don't, if this was a thread about a righty, you would be all over it and condemning it
 
and once again, onceler does not condemn the rhetoric or the speaker, does not want to even consider it, and instead its much better to attack the messenger

keep it up onceler, it only proves you're lying when you say you condemn both sides, you don't, if this was a thread about a righty, you would be all over it and condemning it

I have condemned left-wing rhetoric; I don't do it on demand with you, because you say I "only" do it when you call out the left (and it's really impossible to find a time when you're not doing that, since it's fairly constant).

Don't tell me what I would or wouldn't be doing w/ a righty. I know where this quote is from; it doesn't rise to the level we're discussing, imo - not at all. You try to make everything apples & apples.

Now, let's get onto your condemnation of things; what, would you say, is the % of condemnation you have issued for "righties" as opposed to "lefties"? 5% to 95%, tops?
 
I have condemned left-wing rhetoric; I don't do it on demand with you, because you say I "only" do it when you call out the left (and it's really impossible to find a time when you're not doing that, since it's fairly constant).

Don't tell me what I would or wouldn't be doing w/ a righty. I know where this quote is from; it doesn't rise to the level we're discussing, imo - not at all. You try to make everything apples & apples.

Now, let's get onto your condemnation of things; what, would you say, is the % of condemnation you have issued for "righties" as opposed to "lefties"? 5% to 95%, tops?

bullshit....there has been left wing rhetoric posted today and all you've done is attack the messenger

your posts today prove you don't condemn it, rather, it only matters when it comes from the right, when someone posts something about the left, they're a hack, a liar, can't read....but oh no, not one fucking word about the vitriol rhetoric from the left

sorry, but claiming you do and then turning around and doing the opposite doesn't help your case
 
bullshit....there has been left wing rhetoric posted today and all you've done is attack the messenger

your posts today prove you don't condemn it, rather, it only matters when it comes from the right, when someone posts something about the left, they're a hack, a liar, can't read....but oh no, not one fucking word about the vitriol rhetoric from the left

sorry, but claiming you do and then turning around and doing the opposite doesn't help your case

Didn't think you'd be able to answer the % question. Because you have posted constantly, all day, about lefties & their rhetoric. Very little else.

Your above response = classic projection.
 
Didn't think you'd be able to answer the % question. Because you have posted constantly, all day, about lefties & their rhetoric. Very little else.

Your above response = classic projection.

lmao....i condemned all the right rhetoric, so thats 100%....but then i give a counter balance and that makes a hack

no, that makes YOU a hack....like i said, there was no need to post the right rhetoric as you lefties already had it up, i solely posted a counter balance and of course left wing sycophants like you didn't condemn it, rather you condemned me for daring to show it

you would actually have some credibility had you condemned it instead of solely attacking me, since you didn't, you have zero cred
 
lmao....i condemned all the right rhetoric, so thats 100%....but then i give a counter balance and that makes a hack

no, that makes YOU a hack....like i said, there was no need to post the right rhetoric as you lefties already had it up, i solely posted a counter balance and of course left wing sycophants like you didn't condemn it, rather you condemned me for daring to show it

you would actually have some credibility had you condemned it instead of solely attacking me, since you didn't, you have zero cred

You condemned ALL of it? What...with one quick line, followed by a half dozen threads & probably over 100 posts calling out lefties?

Yep - real balance there. Couldn't be more objective.

And if I ever give even the teensiest bit of caring to what kind of "cred" I have with a lunatic like you, that'll be the day I'll really need a good head examination...
 
You condemned ALL of it? What...with one quick line, followed by a half dozen threads & probably over 100 posts calling out lefties?

Yep - real balance there. Couldn't be more objective.

And if I ever give even the teensiest bit of caring to what kind of "cred" I have with a lunatic like you, that'll be the day I'll really need a good head examination...

thanks again for proving you could care less about rhetoric from the left and instead care more about attacking me

good job

my threads asked questions, the very same questions your lefties are asking about right wing rhetoric, but instead of getting any answers, you guys simply attacked instead, must, must, must defend my party at all costs

that is some real credibility there onceler, objectively pathetic
 
Back
Top