If Trump was implicated in wrongdoing in the Epstein files, how come Obama or Biden never exposed them?

[Diogenes]

Clinton being implicated is proof that Clinton would be implicated

In what way was he implicated, precisely? Nothing criminal has ever been established as far as I'm aware.

A less stupid person would not keep arguing there is no proof Clinton would be implicated

Is that so?

 

[QP!]

In what way was he implicated, precisely? Nothing criminal has ever been established as far as I'm aware.



Is that so?

First prove to me you know what the word implicate means as it does not require any establishment of a crime for someone to be implicated.

Do you understand if someone is never charged with any crime but is suspected of doing one and you were with him at the time, you can be implicated?

 

[Diogenes]

First prove to me you know what the word implicate means as it does not require any establishment of a crime for someone to be implicated.

You "forgot" to include this qualification:

In what way was he implicated, precisely? Nothing criminal has ever been established as far as I'm aware.

Do you understand if someone is never charged with any crime but is suspected of doing one and you were with him at the time, you can be implicated?

Not legally.

 

[QP!]

You "forgot" to include this qualification:






Not legally.

You asked me to prove MY point and my point was he would be implicated.

He was implicated. That is fact. That you deny Clinton was implicated just exposes your stupidity as other magats celebrate the finger being pointed at Clinton now.

It sucks for you I destroyed your stupid thread in the first post but ... oh well

 

[Diogenes]

You asked me to prove MY point and my point was he would be implicated.

"Would be", eh?

He was implicated. That is fact.

Tangentially. Look it up if you need to.

He hasn't been criminally charged, has he?

That you deny Clinton was implicated just exposes your stupidity as other magats celebrate the finger being pointed at Clinton now.

I don't recall denying anything. I recall asking you to prove what you claimed as fact.

Here's your claim:

The rich powerful donors who were in the Epstein files were desired by both parties which was why no DoJ since GWB.Sr wanted to touch those files.

Prove it.

It sucks for you I destroyed your stupid thread in the first post but ... oh well

I don't feel that the thread has been destroyed. Can you elaborate?

Stupid question.

Think so?

 

[QP!]

"Would be", eh?



Tangentially. Look it up if you need to.

He hasn't been criminally charged, has he?



I don't recall denying anything. I recall asking you to prove what you claimed as fact.

Here's your claim:



Prove it.



I don't feel that the thread has been destroyed. Can you elaborate?



Think so?

Again implicated DOES NOT require a criminal charge ever be filed.

Clinton and Trump can be implicated of doing stuff with Epstein that falls below the threshold of criminality.

That you think a person cannot be implicated if no crime is established is just your stupidity

 

[Diogenes]

Again implicated DOES NOT require a criminal charge ever be filed.

Perhaps implications don't matter that much, then.

Clinton and Trump can be implicated of doing stuff with Epstein that falls below the threshold of criminality.

"Implicated of"?

That you think a person cannot be implicated if no crime is established is just your stupidity

If I'd said that, you'd have a point.

Since I didn't, you don't.

 

[QP!]

The thread is destroyed as it's premise has been exposed as stupid.

Every DoJ since Bush Sr avoided opening an investigation as it was clear powerful people and key donors of both party were implicated.

Thus if a full investigation was launched and Clinton ended up being the worst offender not named Epstein or Maxwell, it would hurt the Dems more than the Trump.

That and turning donors against your party and implicating top foreign officials was the reason no one wanted to open that can of worms

 

[Diogenes]

The thread is destroyed as it's premise has been exposed as stupid.

So you say.

Every DoJ since Bush Sr avoided opening an investigation as it was clear powerful people and key donors of both party were implicated.

Is that so?

Thus if a full investigation was launched and Clinton ended up being the worst offender not named Epstein or Maxwell, it would hurt the Dems more than the Trump.

Is that right?

That and turning donors against your party and implicating top foreign officials was the reason no one wanted to open that can of worms

Did you reach that conclusion without evidence?

 

[QP!]

So you say.



Is that so?



Is that right?



Did you reach that conclusion without evidence?

Nope with facts.

Someone as stupid as you denies those facts such as Clinton and others being implicated and no investigation on this being contained to Trump only which is why no one wanted to investigate this prior

 

[Diogenes]

Nope with facts.

Post 'em.

Someone as stupid as you denies those facts such as Clinton and others being implicated and no investigation on this being contained to Trump only which is why no one wanted to investigate this prior

Is that so?

 

[QP!]

Post 'em.



Is that so?

Clinton and others were implicated.

Fact provided.

 

[Diogenes]

Clinton and others were implicated. Fact provided.

Perhaps you don't know what "wrongdoing" implies. Is that the implication I should be implying?

 

[Jake Starkey]

No proof, no truth.

Your assertion is therefore speculative, as previously noted.

Plenty of circumstantial evidence already, plenty of files to go through.

 

[Diogenes]

If you do not vote that means you can be presumed to have tacitly acknowledged that Trump was never implicated in wrongdoing in the Epstein files.

 

[QP!]

Perhaps you don't know what "wrongdoing" implies. Is that the implication I should be implying?

Does not matter.

You wanted to know why Obama and Biden did not investigate if Trump was implicated.

The answer is because Clinton and other top Dems and donors were too.

That investigation once engaged could make the Dems look terrible and cost them donors and Trump could escape mostly unscathed.

That answer would not be known until an investigation concluded.

Thus why no Dem or GOP admin wanted to investigate.

Thus destroying this dumb thread

 

[Diogenes]

Does not matter.

Doesn't it?

You wanted to know why Obama and Biden did not investigate if Trump was implicated.

Implicated in what?

The answer is because Clinton and other top Dems and donors were too.

So you keep saying.

That investigation once engaged could make the Dems look terrible and cost them donors and Trump could escape mostly unscathed.

Could, but hasn't.

That answer would not be known until an investigation concluded.

Yet you already drew your own conclusions, didn't you?

Thus why no Dem or GOP admin wanted to investigate.

Maybe. That remains to be seen. We may never know.

Thus destroying this dumb thread

Is that your assessment?

 

[Jade Dragon]

I selected other. Why?

 

[QP!]

...
Implicated in what?
...

In Epsteins activities whether those could be proved illegal or just reprehensible.

We are currently seeing very powerful men thru Europe and donors and rich men in America, merely implicated in Epstein files being investigated, charged and forced to leave high powered jobs as a result of the files being released because the implications do not look for them.

Exactly the FACT of what i said could still happen with Bill Clinton and other powerful donors.

 

[Diogenes]

In Epsteins activities whether those could be proved illegal or just reprehensible.

We are currently seeing very powerful men thru Europe and donors and rich men in America, merely implicated in Epstein files being investigated, charged and forced to leave high powered jobs as a result of the files being released because the implications do not look for them.

Exactly the FACT of what i said could still happen with Bill Clinton and other powerful donors.

wrongdoing ​