Mott the Hoople
Sweet Jane
and so is #3! Can you imagine life with out pork chops??Your number 2, however, is vital to the continuing success of America.
and so is #3! Can you imagine life with out pork chops??Your number 2, however, is vital to the continuing success of America.
I just feel that Thursdays are better. But then I'm a vegetarian.and so is #3! Can you imagine life with out pork chops??
Not only the above, but tracking every retail purchase would require some sort of biochipping. Can you say "New World Order"?
When will libertarians grow up?
and what would a vegen know about pork chop Tuesday's?I just feel that Thursdays are better. But then I'm a vegetarian.
The current proposal has a generous deduction for the poor. *shrug*Is the fair tax the consumption tax?
That's a completely regressive bullshit tax. The uber wealthy have so much money they now use it mostly as a means of control. Their consumption does not nearly represent the amounst of ill gotten cash they use as means of dictating society's rules.
Never mind the fact that their argument that this is not a regressive taxation system is just plain silly. Good God what the rich won't do to get out of paying taxes.The current proposal has a generous deduction for the poor. *shrug*
The largest single form of regressive taxation is "corporate" taxes. Pretending that such costs do not pass to the consumer, and thus cost the poor the most, is just sad pretense.Never mind the fact that their argument that this is not a regressive taxation system is just plain silly. Good God what the rich won't do to get out of paying taxes.
The largest single form of regressive taxation is "corporate" taxes. Pretending that such costs do not pass to the consumer, and thus cost the poor the most, is just sad pretense.
The largest single form of regressive taxation is "corporate" taxes. Pretending that such costs do not pass to the consumer, and thus cost the poor the most, is just sad pretense.
Business costs, including taxes, are passed on to the consumer. The idea that the corporation pays those without passing on those costs is just imaginary. The costs are passed on with no regression whatsoever, higher costs hurt the poor the most.That's non-sense Damo! US "C" Corps pay on their Federal Taxable Income at a 35% rate. Which means they are fixed and proportional and not regresive.
That's non-sense Damo! US "C" Corps pay on their Federal Taxable Income at a 35% rate. Which means they are fixed and proportional and not regresive.
Again, ignoring real effect is pretense. Costs passed on to consumers is regressive, and it is stupid to pretend that this particular cost will never pass on.Who said anything about that? I said that the tax on corporate profits are not regressive. This laisseiz-faire argument that they are is BS.
Actuall az, that's a myth. Read this brief description and click on the links to the Fair Tax Five that challenges the critisisms.
The current proposal has a generous deduction for the poor. *shrug*
You explain what's mythical.
Why, when all the information, including your complaint has been so well put together for me with links to facts?