007
New member
OK. Now be sensible and answer my questions. Try not to be quite so obviously thick.
Ok, here we go.
Yes there are several unions for government employees.
Too many to list.
Police unions.
Fire unions.
Teachers unions.
Postal unions.
The members of these unions claim that guns are not needed to protect against an oppressive government.
Because the government isn't oppressive.
That is the claim of the anti gun left and the obamacult.
Why then do so many GOVERNMENT employees need to be in unions?
The given purpose of the trades unions is to protect workers from exploitation by oppressive employers.
They work for the government and say it isn't oppressive but join a union to protect them from the oppression of the non oppressive government.
Now, from where I'm standing that is a complete contradiction.
Your questions are pointless, but many have been answered.
Some had no answer, for example "are the employers oppressive"?
The union members say that guns are not needed to protect against an oppressive government.
Yet they join unions to protect them from oppression from their employers( in this case the government)!
So is the government oppressive or not?