All the person writes. "Blind guess...blind guess...."^^^This is one hilarious sentence. Hard to imagine that someone with education could utter it with a straight face.
LOLOLOLOL
All the person writes. "Blind guess...blind guess...."^^^This is one hilarious sentence. Hard to imagine that someone with education could utter it with a straight face.
LOLOLOLOL
morals do exist.Correct. That's why fanatics, be they atheist or theist, are idiots. It's a matter of faith, not fact.
OTOH, since no deities or morals exist, killing assholes means one's soul will never be harmed regardless of their beliefs or disbeliefs, eh? LOL
![]()
Describe how 'theology' is defined, Hugo.I have only seen you discuss that stuff you obsess on.
And you do not know what "theology" means.
use a dictionary you brain dead buffoonDescribe how 'theology' is defined, Hugo.
no.Wrong. Your “should have” fails. Morality IS relative. The Zionists prove it where they have no problem with the genocide they are perpetuating on the Gazans. Notice the Zionists are one of the Abrahamic religions.
The rest of us, atheists included, recognize the disgusting travesty that’s occurring. Fundamentalist Christians are also all for it. They need an Israel to survive to fulfill their Biblical prophecies.
There is no fanaticism about atheism, Sybil. You can't blame your problems on atheists.It's also proof that atheists can be as fanatical as the biggest Bible Thumpers. Like them, they cherry-pick and love to take things out of context.
wrong.This interpretation defies historical context, and runs counter to human psychology.
Jesus wasn't the only Palestinian Jew that locals thought was the Messiah. Other presumed Messiahs had been killed by the Romans, and their followers just scattered to the winds, never to be heard from again, or they started looking around for a new leader.
There is no precedent for what happened with the Jesus movement.
The only resurrection Jews believed in was a general resurrection at the end of time; there was no historical context or expectation for a single individual to resurrect.
If you mean by "fixed the problem" that the Disciples and Evangelists cynically fabricated and concocted a story about Jesus being resurrected and being a divine being, then you're going to have to explain why apostles were willing to be executed for that idea. People do not willingly die for something they actually know is a lie.
Trinitarian doctrine doesn't make me angry. That's just a theological sideshow to me. Trinitarian doctrine happened centuries later and has no bearing on what I consider to be the historical facts of the first century:
The key events of the the first century to me are:
A Jewish rabbi named Jesus lived and taught in and around Galilee;
He was executed by the Romans for political crimes;
His followers came to genuinely believe they saw him after the crucifixion;
He was thought to somehow be God in nature from the very beginning, well before the canonical gospels were written.
Wrong. Try again. Describe how 'theology' is defined.use a dictionary you brain dead buffoon
go kill yourselfWrong. Try again. Describe how 'theology' is defined.
Yes you have. Lying is a sin.It looks like you are proving there is no omnipotent, omnibenevolent god who can prevent evil.
Speak for yourself. Sin is a theological concept. I have never sinned.
that's dispensationalist stupidity.Wrong. Your “should have” fails. Morality IS relative. The Zionists prove it where they have no problem with the genocide they are perpetuating on the Gazans. Notice the Zionists are one of the Abrahamic religions.
The rest of us, atheists included, recognize the disgusting travesty that’s occurring. Fundamentalist Christians are also all for it. They need an Israel to survive to fulfill their Biblical prophecies.
Lying is a sin.
Wrong. Try again. Describe how 'theology' is defined.go kill yourself
go kill yourselfWrong. Try again. Describe how 'theology' is defined.
You're really that clueless?Why is lying a sin?
So you can't describe how 'theology' is define. You are mindlessly chanting again..locked in Step 3.go kill yourself
go kill yourselfSo you can't describe how 'theology' is define. You are mindlessly chanting again..locked in Step 3.
the pharisees clearly wanted Jesus dead.This interpretation defies historical context, and runs counter to human psychology.
Jesus wasn't the only Palestinian Jew that locals thought was the Messiah. Other presumed Messiahs had been killed by the Romans, and their followers just scattered to the winds, never to be heard from again, or they started looking around for a new leader.
There is no precedent for what happened with the Jesus movement.
The only resurrection Jews believed in was a general resurrection at the end of time; there was no historical context or expectation for a single individual to resurrect.
If you mean by "fixed the problem" that the Disciples and Evangelists cynically fabricated and concocted a story about Jesus being resurrected and being a divine being, then you're going to have to explain why apostles were willing to be executed for that idea. People do not willingly die for something they actually know is a lie.
Trinitarian doctrine doesn't make me angry. That's just a theological sideshow to me. Trinitarian doctrine happened centuries later and has no bearing on what I consider to be the historical facts of the first century:
The key events of the the first century to me are:
A Jewish rabbi named Jesus lived and taught in and around Galilee;
He was executed by the Romans for political crimes;
His followers came to genuinely believe they saw him after the crucifixion;
He was thought to somehow be God in nature from the very beginning, well before the canonical gospels were written.
They are not two different religions.this is why they are two different religions and one is better.
In the end did Swiss Bankers make a profit,with their relationship during the Hitler era!yes.
he was a puppet of swiss bankers.