I don't think Perry ever misses a post I compose
I don't think Perry ever misses a post I compose
Faith is not insisting anything. It merely makes a claim. Insisting that the claim is True (trying to prove it) produces the circular argument fallacy. This is what a fundamentalist does.No...the points I made earlier.
Here they are again...bolded and enlarged so you can see them:
When speaking of whether or not any gods exist..."believing" is merely blind guessing. "Faith" on the other hand, is merely insisting that one's blind guess is correct.
So? Still remains an argument of faith. No fallacy.You folk are absolutely sure your blind guesses that a god exists...and that you know what pleases that god and what offends it.
Atheists make no such claim. Atheists don't care whether a god or gods exist or not.Atheists are absolutely sure that their blind guesses that no gods exist (or that it is more likely that no gods exist than that at least one god does exist).
Atheists make no claim.You and those who guess as you do MAY be correct. The atheists MAY be correct.
You have to. It is not possible to prove whether any god or gods exist or not.I do not know which it is...and I would rather not make a blind guess about it.
Perry OCD*. LOL(Don't worry, I don't expect you to explain your "reasoning" here because it would require you to google too much. LOL )
I read it in a physics book I have.
A Christian is someone that believes that Jesus Christ exists, and that He is who He says He is, namely, the Son of God.YES IT HAS BEEN ASKED...SEVERAL TIMES.
NOT ANSWERED.
SEE MY POSTS #1194 & 1216.
Never really answered...just avoided or given short-shrift...with YOU deciding what a Christian is.
So? The Argument of Faith is also known as the Circular Argument. Not in and of itself a fallacy.I am saying your "beliefs" on this issue are merely BLIND GUESSES about the REALITY of existence.
Attempted force of circular argument fallacy.Tell me how you know the stuff you spout as being the truth rather than a guess.
This part is correct.I am saying your "faith" is merely your insistence that your blind guesses are correct.
Attempted force of circular argument fallacy.Tell me how you know the "faith" you have in your blind guesses are "the truth."
Atheists don't particularly avoid. They comment just like any other posters here.Actually discuss the issue rather than do what the atheists do in avoidance.
You just violated the 2nd law of thermodynamics.The way I remember it is because life takes a low entropy energy source (sunlight), and metabolizes and radiates it into a higher entropy energy form. Therefore it accords with the second law of thermodynamics.
It's a weird obsession of his. I looked at his messages and, for the past several days, he only posted to this thread. Before that, he was chasing after you on this thread:I don't think Perry ever misses a post I compose
^^^That's not a citation. And it isn't a reason.
Look, if you don't understand what you read then fine! Just admit this is way out of your area of expertise.
You seem reluctant to acknowledge your clear limitations.
What 'confirmation bias' by atheists? What 'bias' are they 'confirming'?Every example I've cited of Bart Ehrman on this thread is where his conclusions categorically clash with the conclusions of you and Domer.
So don't try to hitch yourself to Ehrman's wagon.
He at least practices a type of agnostic intellectual uncertainty, and he tries to steer clear of the confirmation bias practiced by atheists on this thread and elsewhere.
Atheism is not a belief.You, gmark77, are the one who does not understand atheism. You pretend it is something other than what it is...a belief system.
No such thing. A person is either an atheist, or he is not.And "implicit atheist" is another name for an intellectual coward who wants to use "atheist" as a self-descriptor.
Atheism has no pretense.Grow some balls.
Bullshit. Atheism is a pretense.
Stating there is a god or gods is a religion.TEST:
Do you believe there are no gods?
Do you believe it is more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one?
C'mon. Answer those questions.
I'm not going to go through my library to find the Sean Caroll book I read it in.That's not a citation!
I already posted a reason before you even wrote your postAnd it isn't a reason!
The way I remember it is because life takes a low entropy energy source (sunlight), and metabolizes and radiates it into a higher entropy energy form. Therefore it accords with the second law of thermodynamics.
Must've been a comic book.I read it in a physics book I have.
^^^
Perry Penis-Envy!
Why didn't you just google it, son? I did. It took me 5 seconds:
Entropy and life - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
From Bing AI:The way I remember it is because life takes a low entropy energy source (sunlight), and metabolizes and radiates it into a higher entropy energy form. Therefore it accords with the second law of thermodynamics.
Trump is not an atheist, Sybil. He is a Christian.It's a weird obsession of his. I looked at his messages and, for the past several days, he only posted to this thread. Before that, he was chasing after you on this thread:
This Wikipedia article is wrong. Entropy can never decrease.
I'm not going to go through my library to find the Sean Caroll book I read it in.
I already posted a reason before you even wrote your post
Instead of relying on my posts to teach you new things, why don't you do what I did - do the hard work of extensively reading books on physics, religion, history, etc.
^^^Pro-Tip: Try sticking to things you know when you post.
The way I remember it is because life takes a low entropy energy source (sunlight)
, and metabolizes and radiates it into a higher entropy energy form.