Illegal alien attacks mother. Tries to bite off face of 3 year old kid!!!

[Text Drivers are Killers]

Goddammit trump. Forget about iran. We are being invaded by these latin american psychopaths. Remove all illegals and then remove legal immigrants even if citizens. DIVERSITY IS A HORRIBLE IDEA

april 20 2026 A violent incident at a South Side park left a child seriously injured and a woman shaken after what police say was a sudden attack. The child's mother is now speaking out about the trauma and recovery ahead.

Atharva Vyas, 24, has been charged with injury to a child with intent to cause bodily injury, assault causing bodily injury and illegal entry from a foreign nation, according to court records.
In a GoFundMe post, Perez described the incident as life-changing, saying she and her daughter were "targeted" in the attack.

She said her daughter suffered severe facial injuries, including bites and the loss of two teeth, and is now dealing with significant emotional trauma.

MSN

 

[Grim Reaper]

Goddammit trump. Forget about iran. We are being invaded by these latin american psychopaths. Remove all illegals and then remove legal immigrants even if citizens. DIVERSITY IS A HORRIBLE IDEA

MSN

---

1) The crime itself​

Likely based on a real incident​

There are reports of:

• A child being seriously injured in an attack at a park
• A suspect named Atharva Vyas charged with:
  
  • injury to a child
  • assault causing bodily injury
• The victim’s family describing serious physical and emotional trauma

Incidents like this do occur, and the charges and injuries described are plausible and consistent with local crime reporting.

---

2) “Illegal entry from a foreign nation”​

This part is very questionable / likely misleading:

• “Illegal entry” is a federal immigration offense, not typically listed alongside local assault charges in standard court reporting
• Local news and court records usually:
  
  • do not confirm immigration status
  • and often avoid stating it unless verified by federal authorities

This claim may be:

• misreported
• speculative
• or added for political framing

---

3) “We are being invaded” / generalization about immigrants​

This is not a factual claim—it’s rhetoric.

• Crime by an individual does not demonstrate a broader “invasion”
• Data across many studies shows:
  
  • immigrants (including undocumented immigrants) are not more likely to commit violent crime than native-born citizens, and often less likely

So this is a hasty generalization:

using one case to characterize millions of people

---

4) “Remove legal immigrants even if citizens”​

This is factually and legally wrong:

• U.S. citizens cannot be deported, regardless of background
• Removing citizenship arbitrarily would violate:
  
  • the Constitution
  • due process protections

This is not a policy proposal grounded in law—it’s legally impossible under current constitutional standards

---

5) “Diversity is a horrible idea”​

This is an opinion, not a factual claim.

• There is extensive research on diversity’s effects:
  
  • some studies show economic and innovation benefits
  • others note social cohesion challenges in certain contexts

But:
No single, universally accepted factual conclusion supports the blanket claim

---

6) Emotional framing and bias​

The post uses:

• strong emotional language (“psychopaths,” “invaded”)
• a single violent incident to justify sweeping claims
• collective blame toward a large group

This is a classic pattern:

real event → amplified fear → broad generalization → political conclusion

---

Bottom line​

• A violent incident involving a child likely did occur
• Immigration status details are uncertain or possibly misrepresented
• Claims about an “invasion” are not supported by evidence
• Deporting citizens is legally impossible
• Broad conclusions about immigrants based on one case are logically invalid

---

 

[Taichiliberal]

---

1) The crime itself​

Likely based on a real incident​

There are reports of:

• A child being seriously injured in an attack at a park
• A suspect named Atharva Vyas charged with:
  • injury to a child
  • assault causing bodily injury
• The victim’s family describing serious physical and emotional trauma

Incidents like this do occur, and the charges and injuries described are plausible and consistent with local crime reporting.

---

2) “Illegal entry from a foreign nation”​

This part is very questionable / likely misleading:

• “Illegal entry” is a federal immigration offense, not typically listed alongside local assault charges in standard court reporting
• Local news and court records usually:
  • do not confirm immigration status
  • and often avoid stating it unless verified by federal authorities

This claim may be:

• misreported
• speculative
• or added for political framing

---

3) “We are being invaded” / generalization about immigrants​

This is not a factual claim—it’s rhetoric.

• Crime by an individual does not demonstrate a broader “invasion”
• Data across many studies shows:
  • immigrants (including undocumented immigrants) are not more likely to commit violent crime than native-born citizens, and often less likely

So this is a hasty generalization:

---

4) “Remove legal immigrants even if citizens”​

This is factually and legally wrong:

• U.S. citizens cannot be deported, regardless of background
• Removing citizenship arbitrarily would violate:
  • the Constitution
  • due process protections

This is not a policy proposal grounded in law—it’s legally impossible under current constitutional standards

---

5) “Diversity is a horrible idea”​

This is an opinion, not a factual claim.

• There is extensive research on diversity’s effects:
  • some studies show economic and innovation benefits
  • others note social cohesion challenges in certain contexts

But:
No single, universally accepted factual conclusion supports the blanket claim

---

6) Emotional framing and bias​

The post uses:

• strong emotional language (“psychopaths,” “invaded”)
• a single violent incident to justify sweeping claims
• collective blame toward a large group

This is a classic pattern:

---

Bottom line​

• A violent incident involving a child likely did occur
• Immigration status details are uncertain or possibly misrepresented
• Claims about an “invasion” are not supported by evidence
• Deporting citizens is legally impossible
• Broad conclusions about immigrants based on one case are logically invalid

---

Nicely done! And now Text will either regurgitate the SOS in another form, disappear, or try to divert his failure to another subject while personally attacking you.

 

[Grim Reaper]

Nicely done! And now Text will either regurgitate the SOS in another form, disappear, or try to divert his failure to another subject while personally attacking you.

Oh I know..

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

4) “Remove legal immigrants even if citizens”​

This is factually and legally wrong:

• U.S. citizens cannot be deported, regardless of background
• Removing citizenship arbitrarily would violate:
  • the Constitution
  • due process protections

This is not a policy proposal grounded in law—it’s legally impossible under current constitutional standards

---

​

---

Liar. Show us where the constitution says that.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

I hope everyone notes that liberals are DEFENDING this illegal alien who tried to bite off this girl's face!!!!

 

[AProudLefty]

Goddammit trump. Forget about iran. We are being invaded by these latin american psychopaths. Remove all illegals and then remove legal immigrants even if citizens. DIVERSITY IS A HORRIBLE IDEA

MSN