I'm sorry: I can't get over how stupid Bill O'Reilly is

I don't know why or how you do it Lorax. I can't stomach watching o'leily for more than the second it takes me to click past him.
 
What do you mean? Seriously. I simply don't watch whatever program he is on enough to have known his opinion.

Well, I haven't watched him regularly but the few snippets I've seen I thought it was quite clear he's a republican apologist.
 
I watched it too Lorax. I really think that over half his audience is liberal. If all the liberals just stopped watching, his show would tank. But, everyone is looking to get outraged about something he says. His arrogance gets people to watch and wait for his next stupid statement.
 
Aww.

Dennis Miller, I forgot about him. I just refuse to watch these guys. I don't want to be a screaming lunatic, and that's what listening to them turns me into.

One thing that's great about Dennis Miller is that occassionally he will just randomly blurt out something that is very revealing about the real neocon republican agenda. He is not disciplined about staying on message, or sticking to the talking points.

Back in 2003, Alan Colmes asked Miller about the missing WMD, and Miller just blurted out that the WMD claims were just something to get the troops loaded on the ships, and headed over to Iraq. LOL. Way to get off message Dennis! Even anonymous NeoCon posters in cyberspace were able to stay on message, and quickly pivot from WMD to other excuses like: "Saddam violated 17 Resolutions/It was inevitible that we'd invade/Saddam was thumbing his nose at us.
 
One thing that's great about Dennis Miller is that occassionally he will just randomly blurt out something that is very revealing about the real neocon republican agenda. He is not disciplined about staying on message, or sticking to the talking points.

Back in 2003, Alan Colmes asked Miller about the missing WMD, and Miller just blurted out that the WMD claims were just something to get the troops loaded on the ships, and headed over to Iraq. LOL. Way to get off message Dennis! Even anonymous NeoCon posters in cyberspace were able to stay on message, and quickly pivot from WMD to other excuses like: "Saddam violated 17 Resolutions/It was inevitible that we'd invade/Saddam was thumbing his nose at us.

You know, if there weren't so many dead people, I would really have myself a good laugh. It's so true. All these years, they just spouted one bs story after another...whatever they were told. I love the "saddam was thumbing his nose at us" one.

It sounds like Miller couldn't cut it as a message board neocon whore. You must always, always, stay on message. And they do.
 
The "thumbing his nose" one is mind-boggling to me. The debate leading up the war was all about mushroom clouds over U.S. cities. The public NEVER would have taken the bait on "17 U.N. resolutions."

The rewriting of history has been epic on this one.
 
The "thumbing his nose" one is mind-boggling to me. The debate leading up the war was all about mushroom clouds over U.S. cities. The public NEVER would have taken the bait on "17 U.N. resolutions."

The rewriting of history has been epic on this one.


Yep and which side were the ones crying about "history revisionists" ?
 
Well, I never got the memo.

Damo, sometimes I feel sorry for you...this is one of those times. I won't go so far to say that you are a congenial idiot like that nasty RJS has said, but the thing that everybody is kind of snickering over? Is that no one needed to "get a memo". It's obvious to anyone after two minutes of watching Miller what he is.

Unless...you happen to be another Republican apologist.

:)
 
Damo, sometimes I feel sorry for you...this is one of those times. I won't go so far to say that you are a congenial idiot like that nasty RJS has said, but the thing that everybody is kind of snickering over? Is that no one needed to "get a memo". It's obvious to anyone after two minutes of watching Miller what he is.

Unless...you happen to be another Republican apologist.

:)
I've never seen any of his political commentary. Just like I never knew who Glenn Beck was until he got on CNN...

I tend to listen to people with a different opinion than my own rather than watch stuff with only support for my opinion.
 
Yep and which side were the ones crying about "history revisionists" ?

Getting back to my "hate O'Reilly" thread, he was doing the same thing w/ the Iran resolution that they did with the war resolution back in '02. Potraying it as not a resolution that will allow a war, but a choice between whether you want to be patriotic, or give in to terrorism.

And he & the rest will do the same thing after Bush uses it to invade or bomb Iran: "Democrats voted for war, too!"
 
I've never seen any of his political commentary. Just like I never knew who Glenn Beck was until he got on CNN...

I tend to listen to people with a different opinion than my own rather than watch stuff with only support for my opinion.

:) Ok, I was just trying to explain it to you.
 
Getting back to my "hate O'Reilly" thread, he was doing the same thing w/ the Iran resolution that they did with the war resolution back in '02. Potraying it as not a resolution that will allow a war, but a choice between whether you want to be patriotic, or give in to terrorism.

And he & the rest will do the same thing after Bush uses it to invade or bomb Iran: "Democrats voted for war, too!"

LOL It really is infuriating.
 
The "thumbing his nose" one is mind-boggling to me. The debate leading up the war was all about mushroom clouds over U.S. cities. The public NEVER would have taken the bait on "17 U.N. resolutions."

The rewriting of history has been epic on this one.


Concur.

Its astonishing that 5 years later, anyone has the balls to bring up: "Well, he violated 17 resolutions".
 
Back
Top