Immigrants in the news

[RB 60]

Then it would be a duplication of effort. We don't need to deport them for sending money home and being in the USA illegally, do we?

Yes, absolutely we do.

 

[The Trump Administration]

Yes, absolutely we do.

If we've already deported them for being here illegally, why?

Immigration law is already on the books.

"Sending money home" is not a crime, is it?

 

[RB 60]

If we've already deported them for being here illegally, why?

Immigration law is already on the books.

"Sending money home" is not a crime, is it?

They weren't deported if they made money here and sent it back where they came from.

Yes, and they should be enforced.

No, it's not. But, it should be, because they are taking money from our economy.

 

[Earl]

Laken Riley's 'killer' took taxpayer-funded flight to Georgia​

Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.co.uk › news › article-14097419





6 days ago — Laken Riley's alleged killer was given a taxpayer-funded plane ticket to fly to Georgia, where he brutally murdered the college student, ...

 

[The Trump Administration]

​

6 days ago — Laken Riley's alleged killer was given a taxpayer-funded plane ticket to fly to Georgia, where he brutally murdered the college student, ...

He's not her alleged killer any more.

 

[The Trump Administration]

No, it's not.

So, since we agree they should be deported because they're here illegally, why do you want to wait until a new law is passed - which, BTW, could not be used retroactively, when they can be deported now?

 

[RB 60]

So, since we agree they should be deported because they're here illegally, why do you want to wait until a new law is passed - which, BTW, could not be used retroactively, when they can be deported now?

I don't want to wait. Get rid of them all ASAP!

 

[Earl]

He's not her alleged killer any more.

He wasn't convicted six days ago.

I hoped they would try him with the death penalty on the table.

 

[The Trump Administration]

I don't want to wait. Get rid of them all ASAP!

Then you agree that it would be counter-productive to waste time, money and political capital to pass another law that won't apply to illegals we already deported under existing law, right?

 

[The Trump Administration]

I hoped they would try him with the death penalty on the table.

A Soros-backed prosecutor said "no", didn't she?

 

[Earl]

A Soros-backed prosecutor said "no", didn't she?

Did she?

 

[RB 60]

Then you agree that it would be counter-productive to waste time, money and political capital to pass another law that won't apply to illegals we already deported under existing law, right?

I really don't know where you're going with what I've said.
Get rid of all illegals. Send those who send money out of
this country right along with the money. Simple, and to the point.

 

[The Trump Administration]

Did she?

MSN

 

[The Trump Administration]

I really don't know where you're going with what I've said.

Obviously.

 

[Earl]

But Georgia Western Judicial Circuit District Attorney Deborah Gonzalez decided not to pursue the death penalty against Ibarra in May, about three months after Riley's murder, saying in a May 31 press release that the decision to seek life without the possibility of parole instead of death was "reached after careful deliberation with the senior prosecutor and the support of the victim's family."
foxnerws.com

I wouldn't have been so lenient. Most parents wouldn't.

 

[RB 60]

Obviously.

Then be clear. Again, I've given my opinion. If you find reason to quote it, feel free to disagree, but don't play silly word games.

 

[The Trump Administration]

Then be clear.

What's confusing you?

 

[The Trump Administration]

I wouldn't have been so lenient. Most parents wouldn't.

I guess Soros got what he wanted.

 

[RB 60]

What's confusing you?

Your vagueness.

 

[Earl]

I guess Soros got what he wanted.

I don't give a tinker's damn what Soros wanted...only what the family wanted.