1. i never said i want to impeach obama. nice strawman.
You never said you DIDN'T want to impeach Obama. Given the subject title of the thread, you had ample opportunity to do so, yet instead when others PROVE that there is no grounds for impeachment, YOU interject Soros into the discussion in an attempt to what, sully Obama by guilt through (neocon) association. To what end? The request in the subject title? Come, come Yurtle old thing....the ONLY strawman here is YOU.
i've said it several times before in several different threads. i don't need to repeat myself just so hacks like you don't lie about people's positions. next time, why don't you ASK me what my position is. i'll remember the next time you don't say a negative and accuse you of supporting it....i bet you would go apeshit.
i actually interjected soros and the koch brothers. but you're too much of a hack to acknowledge that and instead whine about soros.
Translation: As the chronology of the posts shows, I proved Yurt wrong, and he doesn't have the guts to own up. So Yurt bluffs and blusters about stuff he allegedly has stated on other threads (but the reader of this thread will have to take his word for it). Also, Yurt makes a statement that's a moot point, as I already pointed it out regarding Soros. Yurt wants to ignore the FACT that Soros has NO relation to the discussion at hand, as he has NOT gotten Dems to sign a "pledge" that affects their direct functioning as Congressmen. Yurt has a bad habit of repeating things as if they magically become fact....but he tends to leave out parts that don't support his contentions.
2. you claimed the pledge was not in accord with their oath. their oath is about upholding and defending the constitution. the pledge does not contradict that.
As the chronology of the posts shows, I and Judge Sarokin explain why you are wrong....and all you've got is typical neocon parrot repetition of a failed assertion to the point of isipidness.3. i never made soros a bogeyman. Yurt, YOU introduced soros into the conversation with a response to Evince that was totally unrelated to the topic at hand. It was aptly demonstrated by myself and others that Soros is NOT on par with Norquist in the discussion. But instead of conceding a point, you do the usual Yurtle shuffle and LIE about what has transpired. that is why i called you a liar earlier. in fact, i said he was not the bogeyman. but you can't rationally defend your claims, so you make stuff up.
no, you didn't explain how i was wrong. your authority even said it wasn't illegal. you can bitch and moan all you want, but your tantrum over repubs making a pledge is hollow as you never bitch when dems make pledges. i never lied, not once. you said it was not in accordance with their oath, their oath is about defending the constitution. nothing about making a pledge is in contradiction to that, even your authority agreed with me on that.
Again folks, all one has to do is read what Judge Sarokin stated in his final paragraphs. Neither I nor he stated that Norquist "pledge" was illegal, but that it does directly conflict with the oath to the Constitution that the Congressmen/Senators take. THAT is what Yurt desperately wants to deny and ignore.....and as for Yurt's lies, all one has to do is follow the chronology of the posts to see that for themselves. What's truly interesting is that Yurt tried to imply that Soros has done the same/similar as Norquist....yet to date Yurt cannot produce ONE document where Soros had put forth (and gotten signatures) a pledge regarding taxes from Democratic senators and congressmen. Since Yurt is constantly making Soros the evil boogeyman puppeteer of the Dem party that is out to subvert the Constitution, you would hear Yurt wail to the moon is indeed Soros did pull off what Norquist has done. But since that is not the case, the sheer hypocrisy of Yurt DEFENDING/EXCUSING/JUSTIFYING Norquist's plege speaks for itself.
No one said YOU used the word "boogeyman", Yurt....I pointed out that you USE Soros as a boogeyman whenever the flaws and chicanery of the GOP and it's supporters is documented. It's an apt description because like on this thread, YOUR ALLEGATIONS AND ASSERTIONS REGARDING SOROS ARE PROVEN WRONG TIME AND AGAIN. I don't have to make stuff up, Yurt...the chronology of the posts will ALWAYS make YOU out to be the intellectually dishonest jackass you are.
you're a lying sack of shit.
Yurt projecting again, as the chronology of the posts verifies everything I stated, while Yurt merely denies and repeats. All Yurt has to do is copy and paste the sentence where I state EXACTLY what he accuses me of here, and there would be no question as to his accusation. But Yurt, you and I, dear reader, KNOW that is not possible.
and not on your tired, lame ass "soros the boogeyman" BS
4. it does not matter who was the inspiration behind a pledge. FACT: pledging to not raise taxes is not in contradiction to their oath to uphold and defend the constitution. both dem and pub politicians make pledges ALL THE TIME. yet, oddly, you never bitch about dem pledges.
Yurt, when will you learn that repeating your worthless opinion, supposition and conjecture is NOT a substitute for facts and the logic derived from those facts. As the chronology of the posts shows, I already addressed your assertion here......that you cannot logically prove your assertion reduces you to just repeating it ad nauseum. So be it. Let me know when you 've got something besides lies, lame insults and repetition.
reply:
Taichi, when will you learn that repeating your worthless opinion, supposition and conjecture is NOT a substitute for facts and the logic derived from those facts. As the chronology of the posts shows, I already addressed your assertion here......that you cannot logically prove your assertion reduces you to just repeating it ad nauseum. So be it. Let me know when you 've got something besides lies, lame insults and repetition.
