So it’s always been the way you describe in the OP. The burden of proof is on the survivor. Maybe?
I’m pretty sure if you go into a bar and “pick a fight” there will be witnesses naming you as the aggressor.
What if neither one had fired a shot and just pointed their firearm at one another. Both can claim self defense right?
So did the child molester
Fixed it for you
One of the POS that came at Kyle pointed a Glock at him
What was Ashli Babbitt armed with?
If a person was breaking into your house, would you be allowed to shoot him before knowing if he was armed?
What if neither one had fired a shot and just pointed their firearm at one another. Both can claim self defense right?
If a person was breaking into your house, would you be allowed to shoot him before knowing if he was armed?
In most states, yes. Even saw a case of a guy killing his estranged wife and her sister after they broke into his house and knowing full well they weren't armed.
Hello JPF,
Not if one of them is black and the other is wearing a badge.
How is it different with Ashli Babbitt?
Hello JPF,
Not if one of them is black and the other is wearing a badge.
It was Ashley babbitt's house.
Learn dif between public and private property.
It was also the house of the people who were inside when she was trying to break in.
It was also the house of the people who were inside when she was trying to break in.
It was also the house of the people who were inside when she was trying to break in.
Public property. And there are serious concerns the occupants were committing a crime.
This is indefensible.