There aren't three examples in Snyder's article. It is a rambling, bloviating, mishmash of radical Leftist nonsense.
For example, Snyder lets slip in an oblique fashion that he's a Communist at heart.
Faced with the complexity of history, liberals struggle with the overwhelming volume of questions to be asked, answers to be offered. Like communism, fascism is an answer to all questions, but a different kind of answer. Communism assures us that we can, thanks to science, find an underlying direction in all events, toward a better future.
He subsequently goes off on a variety of tangents dropping made-up terms in vogue, I suppose, with radical Leftist academia like, "both-sides-ism."
He also gets jabs in at the other whipping boy of the Left at the moment, Elon Musk.
His amateur standing in military knowledge shows in this sentence:
For Hitler, the internal-combustion engine hastened a “Blitzsieg,” a lightning victory.
(note he spelled "Blitzkrieg" wrong. A Blitzsieg would be a lightning show)
Then he conflates radical Leftist ecopolitics with fascism:
The fascist fantasy traditionally involved a return to nature. The Leader’s voice guided us into a competition with other races for habitat. Hitler was obsessed with coming ecological catastrophe
I guess by Snyder's thinking Hitler was a Climate Change champion who would have embraced Gerta Thunberg for both her stand on things environmental and being an Ayrian.
On the whole, I wasted something like five minutes reading that drivel. I want my time back.