Inflation here we come

Topspin

Verified User
"Goldilocks was looking for a diamond bracelet from the Fed, a little pre-Christmas present," said Art Cashin, director of floor operations at UBS. "Instead they got cheap rhinestones. She threw a tantrum yesterday and now the Fed shows up with a new box and says, 'Here's one you haven't opened yet honey.' ":clink:
 
Other than to highlight what stupid sexists they are on Wall Street, which having had worked there, I already knew, what is the significance of this Top? What is the second gift? Are you saying the second gift is inflation?
 
"Goldilocks was looking for a diamond bracelet from the Fed, a little pre-Christmas present," said Art Cashin, director of floor operations at UBS. "Instead they got cheap rhinestones. She threw a tantrum yesterday and now the Fed shows up with a new box and says, 'Here's one you haven't opened yet honey.' ":clink:

Wow... toppy is pretending that he understands economics again. Aloe works well for burns. Hopefully you applied some last night.
 
I'd guess he's saying another rate cut and that it will lead to inflation. I think the credit Crisis can push the economy into a recession and the inflation forecasts are low so we have room for more cuts. Lets just hope that when we start to stabalize they raise them faster than they did when they were down to 1% after 9-11. That's is a major reason were in this mess.
 
the second gift is pumping money into the banks at lower than the fed funds rate.
Superfreak I'd be glad to match my investment returns to yours based on our economics accumen.
Ohh!!! wait cold callers don't deal with people who know what their doing. BURN!!!
 
the second gift is pumping money into the banks at lower than the fed funds rate.
Superfreak I'd be glad to match my investment returns to yours based on our economics accumen.
Ohh!!! wait cold callers don't deal with people who know what their doing. BURN!!!

LMAO.... sure, we can compare investments if you like, but that does not change the fact that you show a complete lack of understanding of economics. As I have stated previously, you have a good knowledge of the energy and tech sectors. But that does not equate to understanding the economy as a whole.

Your whole childish rant about GDP quarters yeseterday is a good example of your lack of knowledge. Then you storm off and refuse to even recognize that the very thing you claimed did not exist.... did indeed exist.

You also continue to toss out the strawman that those of us saying a recession is equivalent to our saying that it will begin immediately.

By the way... what exactly makes you think your idiotic post above is a "burn"???
 
Childish rants.LOFf you freaking cold caller
because you thing you searched back and found a qtr or 2 too dispute it from 50yrs ago.
We're in a new century ya moron, there's this thing called the global economy.
I have shown infinatley moron economics skills than you. Your the kind of tool who'll argue mean vs median all day when the change in both is the same and what matters. That's why your a salesman and somebody else tells you what to tell people to buy. BURN!!!
 
Yep we are in a new century and a world economy, the rules you learned in college are not necessarially still valid sputter.
 
I have shown infinatley moron economics skills than you

It's statements like this that just make reading Top so worth the effort. I love it!
 
I find myself agreeing with topster...he IS infinitely moronic.

Man, that one is a keeper; it's better than jobs doomer....
 
Childish rants.LOFf you freaking cold caller
because you thing you searched back and found a qtr or 2 too dispute it from 50yrs ago.
We're in a new century ya moron, there's this thing called the global economy.
I have shown infinatley moron economics skills than you. Your the kind of tool who'll argue mean vs median all day when the change in both is the same and what matters. That's why your a salesman and somebody else tells you what to tell people to buy. BURN!!!



Man you got to love that one.
 
Childish rants.LOFf you freaking cold caller
because you thing you searched back and found a qtr or 2 too dispute it from 50yrs ago.
We're in a new century ya moron, there's this thing called the global economy.
I have shown infinatley moron economics skills than you. Your the kind of tool who'll argue mean vs median all day when the change in both is the same and what matters. That's why your a salesman and somebody else tells you what to tell people to buy. BURN!!!

You are correct, you have shown "infinateley moron economics skills"

Side note... exactly WHAT math skills did that wonderful MBA program of yours instill in you? I mean, just HOW is the year 2000 fifty years in the past?

Second side note... there has been a global economy for centuries tool. We are certainly more integrated now, but the basic rules of economics have not changed.

Third side note... the change in median and mean CAN be the same, but that is very rare, especially when talking about per capita income.

Fourth side note.... you do realize that the data I provided for you also was to demonstrate the past three recessionary time frames. Thus, destroying your idiotic claim that a high growth period could not be followed by a recession.... a point you have yet to recognize or comprehend.
 
Back
Top