gotta keep the people fighting each other so that the feds can continue subverting the constitution behind their backs............
Do you see Trump's insurrection as constitutional?
not even once...........despite the protestations of you idiots here. but that is over and prosecutions have been in play since then. the only reason for hate filled retards like katzgar to keep promoting this is........well, it's hate
Promoting? What do you mean by that? many of us see Trump's insurrection as the most dangerous day for America since the civil war. Trump did a terrible thing and he is happy he did it and would do it again. He is setting it up for 2024.
'insurrection noun
in·sur·rec·tion | \ ˌin(t)-sə-ˈrek-shən \
Essential Meaning of insurrection
: a usually violent attempt to take control of a government'
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/insurrection
That is not what happened on January 6.
Those morons were not trying to take control of the government.
Trump was still in power.
And I am pretty sure they were not trying to overthrow Trump.
They were just a bunch of morons.
Being led by another moron.
Who got them fired up but whom NEVER asked/told them to riot/cause an insurrection.
Even if he secretly hoped they would.
They got to the Capitol and because the moron in charge of security left the building RIDICULOUSLY under-protected?
The nitwits got inside.
They stumbled around, took a bunch of selfies, broke shit (including a couple cops - sadly) and one of them got killed (serves her right).
Then they left.
It was - by definition - NOT an insurrection.
No matter what the FBI calls it.
It was an insurrection!
What is the definition of insurrection in the United States?
A rising or rebellion of citizens against their government, usually manifested by acts of violence. Under federal law, it is a crime to incite, assist, or engage in such conduct against the United States. A rebellion of citizens or subjects of a country against its government. .. It was not a three hour tour?!!
not even once...........despite the protestations of you idiots here. but that is over and prosecutions have been in play since then. the only reason for hate filled retards like katzgar to keep promoting this is........well, it's hate
'The following is a case law defining Insurrection:
Insurrection means “a violent uprising by a group or movement acting for the specific purpose of overthrowing the constituted government and seizing its powers. An insurrection occurs where a movement acts to overthrow the constituted government and to take possession of its inherent powers.” [Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1392-1393 (E.D. Pa. 1995)]'
https://definitions.uslegal.com/i/insurrection/
That is NOT what those MAGA morons were trying to do.
They were not trying to seize power.
Trump was ALREADY IN power.
It was not an insurrection.
And the next time you post a quote/definition without a link?
I will probably ignore it.
you bet your ass it is hate, hate for any and all trump people. Hate for your homophobia. Hate for your racism. Its actually called self defence.
just because your drugs have you delusonal doesnt mean squat, it was indeed an insurrection.
'The following is a case law defining Insurrection:
Insurrection means “a violent uprising by a group or movement acting for the specific purpose of overthrowing the constituted government and seizing its powers. An insurrection occurs where a movement acts to overthrow the constituted government and to take possession of its inherent powers.” [Younis Bros. & Co. v. Cigna Worldwide Ins. Co., 899 F. Supp. 1385, 1392-1393 (E.D. Pa. 1995)]'
https://definitions.uslegal.com/i/insurrection/
That is NOT what those MAGA morons were trying to do.
They were not trying to seize power.
Trump was ALREADY IN power.
It was not an insurrection.
And the next time you post a quote/definition without a link?
I will probably ignore it.
gotta keep the people fighting each other so that the feds can continue subverting the constitution behind their backs............
Do you see Trump's insurrection as constitutional?