Interesting, Trump says today's events prove "no collusion,"

RB 60 said:
Frank, you should take up religion and pray. If nothing more, it should calm you down, at least a little...
Click to expand...

Man...I am as calm as Perry Como when he was alive.

You puppets seem to trigger easily though.

Just let it pass.
 
RB 60 said:
Frank, you should take up religion and pray. If nothing more, it should calm you down, at least a little...
Click to expand...
Meditation serves the same purpose without the need of religion. I love yoga, too, stretching and centering your thoughts.
 
I have been listening to Fox. The talking points is none of the charges against anyone has shown any sort of collusion by Trump. Then they say, "2 years, no evidence of collusion" a few times. Then they repeated a couple times Mueller is bringing charges on unrelated/made up process crimes, then telling them if they lie and say bad things about Trump they will reduce the punishment. Then they say there is no evidence of Trump crimes, he paid those hookers out of his own money so that is completely cool. Didnt mention the home loan. Anyway, listen to Fox, this aint a thing.
 
m2 #66

I can't tell you how many times Trump has been to court, whether for bankruptcy, or some other violation of law.

Trump is notorious for NOT $paying what he owes. Some accounts indicate it is a severe enough problem to the unpaid that there's been at least one suicide because of it.

If Trump has earned such reputation for NOT paying what he owes, why then would Trump $pay what he does NOT owe?

Yet there doesn't seem to be much dispute about whether Trump had Stormy Daniels paid.

Would you have us believe Trump had her paid for no reason?

And if Trump was married at the time of the apparent indiscretion for which she was being paid, is such payment not further evidence of Trump marital infidelity? Grounds for divorce?
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Coordination with a foreign country in an election violates which statute in the US Code? Russian influence in an election, more generally, is an indication for a counterintelligence investigation. That’s only been going on for decades.

How did we end up with an SP again?
Click to expand...

The law prohibiting foreign contributions:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30121

The definition of foreign principle which includes foreign governments:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/22/611#b

The penalties for violations of campaign finance:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/30109
 
Darth Beto Omar said:
Then why hasn’t Mullet indicted the DNC/Hillary campaign for soliciting something of value from a foreign agent?
Click to expand...

What are you saying they solicited?

It is not a violation of campaign finance law to purchase opposition research. Steele was hired by a company hired by the Clinton campaign.
Campaign finance law is clear about anything of value has to be purchased at a fair market value. It only becomes an issue when it can be considered a donation because no money or less money than it's value was paid.

The funny thing is by declaring the Steele dossier is worthless, it means that the Clinton campaign could have gotten it for free without it being a violation. In order for the Clinton campaign to be guilty of a foreign donation the Steele dossier would have to be worth a lot more than they paid.


Here's an interesting question:

If the Steele dossier leads to the impeachment of Trump, would it mean Clinton violated campaign laws because they didn't pay enough for the dossier?
 
The Special Counsel was appointed to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential elections.

That seems to be an actual thing. Trying to parse the investigation down to something you don't like doesn't make Russian interference not an actual thing.
 
the day republicans began admiring Putin was the day they entirely sold out to the Russian dictatorship
 
archives said:
a theme I see the nightly Fox demogogues are also pounding home.

Simple question, if Trump believes there is no collusion why does he find the need to tell everyone nearly daily that there was no collusion? If you know you are innocent of a charge, why the compulsion to repeat as often as you can to anyone who will listen that you are innocent?
Click to expand...

No one in the Trump family has been charged. It's a nothing burger.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
What are you saying they solicited?

It is not a violation of campaign finance law to purchase opposition research. Steele was hired by a company hired by the Clinton campaign.
Campaign finance law is clear about anything of value has to be purchased at a fair market value. It only becomes an issue when it can be considered a donation because no money or less money than it's value was paid.

The funny thing is by declaring the Steele dossier is worthless, it means that the Clinton campaign could have gotten it for free without it being a violation. In order for the Clinton campaign to be guilty of a foreign donation the Steele dossier would have to be worth a lot more than they paid.


Here's an interesting question:

If the Steele dossier leads to the impeachment of Trump, would it mean Clinton violated campaign laws because they didn't pay enough for the dossier?
Click to expand...

It’s an academic question because the Dossier is unverified but it would be a case of Russian collusion taking down a president.

So, had Junior purchased some oppo research from the Russian lawyer in Trump Tower it would be ok?
 
archives said:
a theme I see the nightly Fox demogogues are also pounding home.

Simple question, if Trump believes there is no collusion why does he find the need to tell everyone nearly daily that there was no collusion? If you know you are innocent of a charge, why the compulsion to repeat as often as you can to anyone who will listen that you are innocent?
Click to expand...

It's because Fox News and Donald Trump are too stupid to understand what "Synergy" is!
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The Special Counsel was appointed to ensure a full and thorough investigation of the Russian government's efforts to interfere in the 2016 Presidential elections.

That seems to be an actual thing. Trying to parse the investigation down to something you don't like doesn't make Russian interference not an actual thing.
Click to expand...

Russian interference is an actual thing.

An actual thing for a counterintelligence investigation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top