AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
So you think I edited it?
Yes. It's in the quote!
So you think I edited it?
Peer review and "leftist doctrine of peer review" are different. The former is a necessary procedure to advance legitimate knowledge . No problem with that. The latter however is a doctrine because it's a belief that if something is "peer reviewed" then it is above question especially if questioned by non scientists or people who can read. If "peer review" by itself was so wonderful then we'd be quite comfortable letting the police decide police wrong doing and who should be punished.
Yes. It's in the quote!
Last time: Where did any "leftist" assert that peer review means "above question?"
Prove I edited it.
Climate change asshole along with the other leftist doctrine of consensus. It stunning how fucking stupid you are.
Wow, bye.
Heh. Look at post #14 and #15. And look at timestamps.
You better run bitch
Be honest. Did you graduate from high school? GED?
You better run bitch
What about them
That is a no.
You asked for proof.
What I'm intrigued by is the leftist doctrine of "peer review" as if that makes all conclusions of science infallible. I
love how much of a religion science is for some people.
Then address what I said cunt mouth.
I asked for proof of the time stamps on posts 14 and 15? You will have to copy and paste where I requested that. After that prove I edited post 9.
What I'm intrigued by is the leftist doctrine of "peer review" as if that makes all conclusions of science infallible. I
love how much of a religion science is for some people.
You sound like you have never set foot on a college campus.
Peer review is not a leftist doctrine.
Peer review goes back to Isaac Newton and before.
It is a simple idea which simply requires one to have other experts in the field review your work.
That can only act to strengthen the work, or uncover weaknesses before publication.
Your memory is poor. I said the proof is in your quote in my post #15. Notice anything missing?