Iran is mining the straight of Hormuz

The weakness of the Carter administration followed by indifference from Reagan. 9/11 was largely a fault of Clinton who put a solid firewall between the CIA and FBI meaning there was little or no cooperation between international and domestic terrorist information passing back and forth.


Carter let the Shaw fall and made the rise of the Ayatollahs in Iran possible. He made the rise of Saddam possible. Those events led to a general rise in terrorism across the Middle East.
I will not reply with 'why do you hate America' because you think Carter and Reagan admin made mistakes as that would be stupid and what you do. You are entitled to that view even if others disagree AND IT IS NOT indicative or 'love or hate of America or Troops' and is INSTEAD how you view policy choices and leadership.

Just as the people who think the weakness of the Trump Admin and his indifference to how the country is impacted is a view others, who are not you, can hold and IT IS NOT indicative or loving or hating America or the troops. It is a criticism of a SPECIFIC ADMINISTRATION only.
 
The weakness of the Carter administration followed by indifference from Reagan. 9/11 was largely a fault of Clinton who put a solid firewall between the CIA and FBI meaning there was little or no cooperation between international and domestic terrorist information passing back and forth.


Carter let the Shaw fall and made the rise of the Ayatollahs in Iran possible. He made the rise of Saddam possible. Those events led to a general rise in terrorism across the Middle East.
Also if you get to judge the moves Clinton, Carter, Reagan did in your belief it hurt agency effectiveness and cooperation and made things worse then so to do we with regards to what the Trump admin has done


--------...


There are several federal departments, agencies, and specific programs that journalists, analysts, and members of Congress have said were cut, weakened, reorganized, or redirected under the Trump administration in ways that affect work on international threats, terrorism, or national security.
Below is a structured list of the main ones mentioned in reporting and policy analysis, along with what changed.




Major National-Security / Counter-Terrorism Agencies Reportedly Weakened or Restructured​


1. Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)​


Role: Primary U.S. agency investigating terrorism inside the U.S.


Reported changes


  • Agents and analysts moved out of the Domestic Terrorism Operations Section.
  • Personnel reassigned from Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTFs)
  • Senior agents removed, reassigned, or forced out of leadership roles in some field offices.
  • Staffing gaps reported in cybersecurity units.

Why critics say it matters


  • JTTFs are the main mechanism coordinating investigations of both domestic and international terrorist threats.
  • Reasons cited for many of these firings or reassignments were because individuals in those departments worked on various investigations into Trump and also many were transferred to immigration enforcement operations.



2. Department of Justice (DOJ) – National Security Division​


Role: Prosecuting terrorism, espionage, and foreign intelligence crimes.


Reported changes


  • Reassignment of senior career officials from the National Security Division and Criminal Division early in the administration.
  • Proposed consolidation or cuts to sections inside DOJ.



3. Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)​


Role: Coordinates the entire U.S. intelligence community.


Reported changes


  • Budget cut of over $700 million.
  • Workforce reduced by more than 40%.
  • Functions such as the Foreign Malign Influence Center folded or eliminated.

Why critics say it matters


  • ODNI integrates intelligence across CIA, NSA, FBI, and other agencies dealing with foreign threats.



4. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Counter-Extremism Programs​


Role: Prevention and research programs on violent extremism.


Reported changes


  • Funding halted for violence-prevention research projects and databases tracking domestic terrorism and extremist violence.

Examples cut


  • National terrorism database at University of Maryland
  • Programs studying online radicalization and school shooting prevention



5. Counter-Terrorism Research / Prevention Grants​


Role: Federal grants funding prevention programs.


Reported changes


  • Some federal grant recipients were told to stop counter-terrorism prevention work while programs were reassessed.
  • Researchers described the cuts as the government “getting out of the terrorism prevention business.”



6. State Department – Civilian Security and Human Rights Bureaus​


Role: Diplomatic tools used to counter extremism, stabilize regions, and support democracy abroad.


Reported changes


  • Reorganization eliminating several offices, including:
    • Office of Global Women’s Issues
    • Diversity and Inclusion Office
    • Some functions under Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights.

Context


  • Administration said this was to reduce bureaucracy and refocus on geopolitical threats.



7. USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development)​


Role: Foreign aid and stabilization programs that can reduce conditions linked to extremism.


Reported changes


  • Plan to eliminate all overseas USAID positions and transfer programs to the State Department.
  • Around 83% of programs reportedly shut down or consolidated in restructuring.

Why critics connect this to security


  • Development programs historically are used to reduce instability and radicalization in fragile states.



8. Transportation Security Administration (TSA) & FEMA (Preparedness Programs)​


Role: Security at transportation hubs and emergency response to attacks.


Reported changes


  • Budget cuts affecting preparedness and detection programs according to policy critiques.



Other Security-Related Changes Mentioned​


Additional structural shifts reported:


  • Proposal to merge the DEA and ATF and cut staff across DOJ functions.
  • Reassignment of intelligence and counterterror personnel to immigration enforcement priorities.



Summary:​



  • There is a strong view the changes could reduce capacity to track terrorism, extremism, foreign interference, and cyber threats.
 
T. A. Gardner is a mutt if he thinks questioning the Pres is disrespecting and not honoring the troops.

What shallow and lazy thinking.
He does not believe that though as he criticized Biden and you can see Reagan, Carter and Clinton above.

What he is doing is the NeoCon tactic when they struggle to make or find any rationale for the war that they think they can sell the citizens on.

If they could make good arguments they would try, and Terry does not, and instead it is the 'any criticism means you hate America and the troops'.

Ergo any war action the POTUS takes anywhere in the world for any reason must be cheered and supported without critical thought and opposition or you are a bad person who hates America and the Troops.

That argument actually worked in the 1970's for a long time for wars like Vietnam and many that followed where you would see Neocons on tv news exclusively arguing those who opposed the actions as 'hating America and the troops'.
 
The CIA and empowerment by both parties lead to the rise of pan-Islam in the ME in the last seventy years.
Yup.

And it is obvious that Trump thinking he should (and any successor he appoints, in his Board of Peace) ultimately control Gaza, ultimately pick leadership in Venezuela and control their oil, decide who will lead Iran next, is exactly the type of prior US Neocon thinking that garnered Osama Bin Laden and other leaders in other terrorist org's to target the US, including the homeland, as a way to reject the colonization of their land and resources by the US, while the US propped up abusive leadership in those countries.
 
And, his 72 virgins are using him for skeet practice...

Nuns-With-Guns.jpg
 
Back
Top