Well, that wasn't my point. I was changing your use of "kindergartner" to grade schooler, but that you picked up on that as a personal comparison shows you probably are.
My opening comment was, "Okay, we strongly disagree." Not sure how you were playing off that comment with, "Grade schooler. But otherwise pretty much."That sentence played off the opening comment--which wasn't a sentence per se.
I'm not defending Trump here. I'm going with historical commentary by military experts like:
![]()
Or Clausewitz:
![]()
No, he's not. You're an idiot who apparently thinks war is just a noisy debate.
I am a man...and at my age, I am relatively weak physically. But I am strong morally and ethically...which is something you are lacking, TA.![]()
You are a weak man, if a man at all.

From a man that lost his country to people who practice war as I describe it.I am a man...and at my age, I am relatively weak physically. But I am strong morally and ethically...which is something you are lacking, TA.
View attachment 80579
TA is right. You have a grade school mentality.If you want to think of me as a grade schooler...fine with me.
A grade schooler would have done a better job of composing that sentence.
Okay, so you have to defend the Asshole-in-Chief. Great. So...you have no self-respect...and that is your right.
Pummel away...with your heroic commander of the military.
He's rubbing off on you. Too bad for you.
As I said, "We obviously have a different opinion about how we treat others." And I do have self-respect.
Give it a try, TA. You might like it.
Iran will not have control over anything, Wally.It is going to get worse? I certainly hope you are wrong.
Control over the Strait of Hormuz.
Why would ships intentionally enter Iranian waters and submit to Iranian control, if they were slipping past the Iranians?
And yet trump is unwilling to even try?
He already made his point and very clearly. Ignoring won't work.Learn how to write coherently and "your point" will become clear.
Contextomy fallacy. That won't work either, Doofan.My opening comment was, "Okay, we strongly disagree." Not sure how you were playing off that comment with, "Grade schooler. But otherwise pretty much."
Repetition fallacy (chanting).Learn how to write coherently.
Repetition fallacy (chanting).YOU ARE DEFENDING TRUMP. While learning how to write coherently, you should also learn how to be truthful.
Then don't act like one.I am not an idiot.
Lie. Denial...and I do not think war is just a noisy debate. I think war is something that should be considered carefully before entering...which the Asshole-in-Chief apparently did not do...and which you are defending.
A weak man. Your morals and ethics are lying and making shit up and hating Trump (TDS).Excellent use of the word "apparently" in that comment, though. Maybe there is hope for you.
I am a man...and at my age, I am relatively weak physically. But I am strong morally and ethically..
He has declared his morals and ethics and I agree with him most of the time. Belittlement fallacy..which is something you are lacking, TA.
Ethics is not a quantity, Doofan. Morality is not a quantity either.
And you're still an evil spawn of satanProblem is, Tucker is a right wing idiot.