Burn this witch at the stake!good. but 29.1? they should pay more.
Jk
Burn this witch at the stake!good. but 29.1? they should pay more.
I'm old and nearly blind
The owner is the corporation
Grasshopper
Ok, my wife took over taxes and bills a decade ago
Used to be ordinary income for dividends and a higher rate for cap gains
oh really? So if a corporation gets sued, all the owner's personal assets should be used to pay successful claimants?
I paid 11 percent when I was a salary slave grinding for a measly $125,000 salary!
I'll pay half as an investor
JAH bless America!
To the extent that I own the corporation, they do. So once they plow through my 1000 or so shares of Merck, that pretty much covers my percentage of ownership and liability.
Don't you know any rich peopleoh really? So if a corporation gets sued, all the owner's personal assets should be used to pay successful claimants?
You really have a poor understanding of corporate law and accounting.
So correct me. I'm an eager student.
I was thinking of a termHere's a research term for you, "The Corporate Veil". Get to studying, tyke.
I was thinking of a term
Limited liability
Grasshopper soon you will buy your first stockYes, simon, that applies too. Good boy.
Grasshopper soon you will buy your first stock
I willSince we're touting, look into Isis Pharmaceuticals. heh.
the buffet rule means:
i could have paid more taxes, but i did not. you should do the same.