IRS scandal & Benghazi... how many other cover ups are out there?

You are soooo proud of your public high school diploma

Is he kidding me? Before he got me put on forced IA, I never failed to be disdainfully amused by his glaringly grammatically incorrect signature. Not quite as funny as his complete failure to comprehend commas, but still funny.
 
You know, I'm really disappointed with Obama and his whole pathetic staff who he relies on for merely everything. He is a wimp, there I said it being a strong and hardcore semi-liberal. Obama belongs in Harvard; not the White House. I hate it when he constantly points the finger at the Republicans when they had nothing to do with this; they were actually the targets in this scandal. I also hope that they fire Jay Carney or whatever his name is (he's a liar and a nasty shithead).
 
You know, I'm really disappointed with Obama and his whole pathetic staff who he relies on for merely everything. He is a wimp, there I said it being a strong and hardcore semi-liberal. Obama belongs in Harvard; not the White House. I hate it when he constantly points the finger at the Republicans when they had nothing to do with this; they were actually the targets in this scandal. I also hope that they fire Jay Carney or whatever his name is (he's a liar and a nasty shithead).

There you said it.

You should lead a parade of democrats to the alter of Obvious Truth.
 
Last year, the government rejected an unprecedented amount of Freedom of Information Act requests. “The administration cited exceptions built into the law to avoid turning over materials more than 479,000 times, a roughly 22 percent increase over the previous year,” The Associated Press reported in March.

“We’ve seen a meteoric rise in the number of claims to protect secret law, the government’s interpretations of laws or its understanding of its own authority,” Alexander Abdo of the ACLU told the AP. “In some ways, the Obama administration is actually even more aggressive on secrecy than the Bush administration.”
http://antiwar.com/blog/2013/05/14/...nt-to-enforce-obama-demand-for-total-secrecy/

Obama's secrecy fixation causing Sunshine Week implosion
Even the most loyal establishment Democrats are now harshly denouncing the president for his war on transparency

When Barack Obama ran for president in 2008, his pledges of openness and transparency were not ancillary to his campaign but central to it. He repeatedly denounced the Bush administration as "one of the most secretive administrations in our nation's history", saying that "it is no coincidence" that such a secrecy-obsessed presidency "has favored special interests and pursued policies that could not stand up to the sunlight." He vowed: "as president, I'm going to change that." In a widely heralded 2007 speech on transparency, he actually claimed that this value shaped his life purpose:

"The American people want to trust in our government again – we just need a government that will trust in us. And making government accountable to the people isn't just a cause of this campaign – it's been a cause of my life for two decades."

His campaign specifically vowed to protect whistleblowers, hailing them as "the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government" and saying that "such acts of courage and patriotism. . . should be encouraged rather than stifled." Transparency groups were completely mesmerized by these ringing commitments. "We have a president-elect that really gets it," gushed Charles Davis, executive director of the National Freedom of Information Coalition, in late 2008; "the openness community will expect a complete repudiation of the Ashcroft doctrine." Here's just one of countless representative examples of Obama bashing Bush for excessive secrecy - including in the realm of national security and intelligence - and vowing a fundamentally different course ..

---

It is telling indeed that even Democratic loyalists are losing their patience with Obama's secrecy obsession, as it reveals just how extreme it is. And all of this from a president who not only centrally vowed in his campaign to usher in a new era of transparency, but who still praises himself for having done so.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/mar/14/obama-transparency-podesta-sunshine-week
 
Candy, I know you want to avoid the question and are embarrassed by what you posted, considering you cant even discuss it... but lets clear the air...

You just jumped on the "cover up" bandwagon because it was in the Conservative talking points and simply assumed it was true, correct?

You were wrong, there is no evidence of any cover up, and certainty not "cover ups".
 
I wish we could unban Dixie, at least he would be willing to share some harebrained concoction of a cover-up and then try to defend it... I miss that.
 
Candy, I know you want to avoid the question and are embarrassed by what you posted, considering you cant even discuss it... but lets clear the air...

You just jumped on the "cover up" bandwagon because it was in the Conservative talking points and simply assumed it was true, correct?

You were wrong, there is no evidence of any cover up, and certainty not "cover ups".

Dear dumbass, if you are going to ignore when people respond to you, then don't expect them to continue to respond to you.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top