Is collusion a crime?

floridafan

Verified User
Former federal prosecutor Seth Waxman in a Friday appearance on CNN slammed President Donald Trump for insisting repeatedly that “collusion isn’t a crime”, and said that if the president or his associates engaged in bribery, they could face RICO charges that could be used to flip his most senior advisors.

“We’ve been listening to the president for months since the inception of the investigation jumping up and down, and his lawyers screaming ‘collusion is not a crime, it’s nowhere in the federal code.’ I’m here to say that’s flatly not true,” Waxman said. “The federal code in the bribery statutes, 18 United States Code section 201 expressly makes collusion a crime.”

Waxman said that if Trump or his associates accepted anything of value from Russia -including “dirt on Hillary Clinton”- in exchange for help on the campaign, they could be facing a 15-year stay in prison.

“When there’s a bribery charge, there can be even more serious offenses, things called honest services fraud which is a 20-year offense, and the most powerful weapon a federal prosecutor can use, RICO, the racketeering act,” he added. “Those are the kind of charges that are used to flip senior members of a conspiracy or a criminal enterprise.”
 
Mueller hot nothing

They coerced Cohen into admitting to non crimes

Just because someone admits committing a crime doesn’t mean others have

But I will wait for the indictment. Any day now right?

They should have all they need.
 
Former federal prosecutor Seth Waxman in a Friday appearance on CNN slammed President Donald Trump for insisting repeatedly that “collusion isn’t a crime”, and said that if the president or his associates engaged in bribery, they could face RICO charges that could be used to flip his most senior advisors.

“We’ve been listening to the president for months since the inception of the investigation jumping up and down, and his lawyers screaming ‘collusion is not a crime, it’s nowhere in the federal code.’ I’m here to say that’s flatly not true,” Waxman said. “The federal code in the bribery statutes, 18 United States Code section 201 expressly makes collusion a crime.”

Waxman said that if Trump or his associates accepted anything of value from Russia -including “dirt on Hillary Clinton”- in exchange for help on the campaign, they could be facing a 15-year stay in prison.

“When there’s a bribery charge, there can be even more serious offenses, things called honest services fraud which is a 20-year offense, and the most powerful weapon a federal prosecutor can use, RICO, the racketeering act,” he added. “Those are the kind of charges that are used to flip senior members of a conspiracy or a criminal enterprise.”

Post the statute.
 
Mueller hot nothing

They coerced Cohen into admitting to non crimes

Just because someone admits committing a crime doesn’t mean others have

But I will wait for the indictment. Any day now right?

They should have all they need.

You have been whining and screaming for months that collusion is not a crime, well here it is, honey bunny,
People dont go to jail for non crimes.
People dont admit to non crimes.
Even the head of AMI acknowledges just what happened
There is audio tape
Next little girly exucuse!

Did I mention that collusion IS A CRIME?
 
Mueller hot nothing

They coerced Cohen into admitting to non crimes

Just because someone admits committing a crime doesn’t mean others have

But I will wait for the indictment. Any day now right?

They should have all they need.

I'm not buying your sincerity here.

Has a "been there, done that" attitude that just isn't persuasive or convincing.

Once more, with feeling.
 
Mueller hot nothing

They coerced Cohen into admitting to non crimes

Just because someone admits committing a crime doesn’t mean others have

But I will wait for the indictment. Any day now right?

They should have all they need.

you sound nervous , just wait until the NY attorney general get a hold of the trumps after Muller


LETITIA JAMES FIRST BLACK NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL IS COMING FOR TRUMP’S NECK — AND HIS FAMILY


https://www.blackenterprise.com/letitia-james-new-york-attorney-general-trump-new-york/

ab2e7e97e1d90d056ab866aa5237352c


untitled_collage_48.jpg
 
You have been whining and screaming for months that collusion is not a crime, well here it is, honey bunny,
People dont go to jail for non crimes.
People dont admit to non crimes.
Even the head of AMI acknowledges just what happened
There is audio tape
Next little girly exucuse!

Did I mention that collusion IS A CRIME?

When can we accept the indictments?

Haven’t seen any RUSSIAN collusion have you?

Is it illegal to use your own money to pay off people who violate NDAs? The short answer is no.

I know you think Trump is boxed in. He is not. Trust me.
 
When can we accept the indictments?

Haven’t seen any RUSSIAN collusion have you?

Is it illegal to use your own money to pay off people who violate NDAs? The short answer is no.

I know you think Trump is boxed in. He is not. Trust me.


18 U.S. Code § 201 - Bribery of public officials and ...

Comparison of Old and New Conflict of Interest Sections of Title 18, United States Code. New 18 U.S.C. 203. Subsection (a) of this section in general prohibits a Member of Congress and an officer or employee of the United States in any branch or agency of the Government from soliciting or receiving compensation for services rendered on behalf ...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201
 
(a) For the purpose of this section—
(1) the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;
(2) the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and
(3) the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question, matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.
(b) Whoever—
(1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent—
(A) to influence any official act; or
(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of such official or person;
(2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity, in return for:
(A) being influenced in the performance of any official act;
(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United States; or
(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty of such official or person;
(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;
(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in return for absenting himself therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value, whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both, and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit under the United States.

(c) Whoever—
(1) otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty—
(A) directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official; or
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such official or person;
(2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;
(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such person’s absence therefrom;
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than two years, or both.

(d) Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and testifying.
(e) The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.
(Added Pub. L. 87–849, § 1(a), Oct. 23, 1962, 76 Stat. 1119; amended Pub. L. 91–405, title II, § 204(d)(1), Sept. 22, 1970, 84 Stat. 853; Pub. L. 99–646, § 46(a)–(l), Nov. 10, 1986, 100 Stat. 3601–3604; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, §§ 330011(b), 330016(2)(D), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2144, 2148.)


https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201
 
Uranium one has been completely and thoroughly debunked. Perhaps Vince Foster was holding it in his lap when he committed suicide? Maybe the Clintons buried it in their Whitewater development.
 
Uranium one has been completely and thoroughly debunked.

Wishful thinking, Nerdberg?

FBI agents raided the Maryland home of Dennis Nathan Cain just last month. Cain's lawyer said that the agent who led the raid accused his client of possessing stolen federal property and ignored his claims of whistleblower protection. Cain's lawyer also claimed that Horowitz had transmitted his information to the House and Senate intelligence committees.

The FBI had looked into the agreement and uncovered that some Russian nuclear industry officials were engaged in nefarious dealings, which included extortion, bribery and kickbacks, as reported in the Hill in 2017. Evidence of wrongdoing by Vadim Mikerin, the Russian official overseeing Putin’s nuclear expansion in the U.S. who was eventually sentenced to prison, was discovered by the FBI before the deal was approved.

That Russians were involved in nefarious dealings isn’t a surprise.

The concern was that the FBI knew that Russian nuclear industry officials had engaged in bribery, kickbacks, extortion and money laundering designed to help Russian President, and world’s richest man, Vladimir Putin, increase his commercial nuclear ambitions inside the United States, in violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Rather than take action against this deal, the Department of Justice just continued investigating the matter for years, essentially leaving the American public, Congress, the Secretary of State and the Administration in the dark about more Russian meddling in the United States, this time involving nuclear. The key to this issue’s resurgence is that Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State at the time, Bill Clinton got a substantial speaking fee in Russia that year, and Russian money found its way to the Clinton Foundation.

The State Department and several government agencies on the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States first unanimously approved the 2010 sale of Canadian mining company Uranium One to the Russian nuclear giant Rosatom. In 2013, Russia obtained 100% interest in Uranium One.

That is not to say Uranium One has been idle since that time. They have been buying up mines as fast as they can.






https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2018/12/13/russian-uranium-one-deal-and-hillary-clinton-in-the-news-again/#5c0040d2526d
 
Back
Top