And once again, you (and they) seem unable to articulate what 'better' is. Because that's not what they are interested in. They are interested in bashing Biden. And so are you. You even use the juvenile 'Brandon' label. It isn't about discussing options, it's about bashing the other side. You aren't that hard to figure out.
The fact is that Biden has unified Europe and painted Putin into a corner with sanctions. But that was never going to be good enough for you, because it's 'Brandon'. You are like seventh graders on the playground.
And once again, the point isn't whether I articulate anything at all, the point is that it is stupid to equate a wish for a stronger response, which can be anything from applying the sanctions before Russia entered Ukraine as a deterrent and incentive to act like a responsible global citizen all the way up to some of them supporting sending in some US troops killing some Russians, with "supporting Russia"... only a moron could possibly believe you really cannot comprehend that a wish for a stronger response (and likely a wish for a return to energy independence) is not, nor can it be "accidentally" conflated with, "support Russia".
Basically, you ask for a specific "definition" of what "more" might mean and I've already provided it. There are infinite choices that are stronger than what Brandon did, and those folks can want any of them and not one of them will ever be "support Russia".
You stupidly and purposefully pretend to equate someone who wanted a stronger response from the US to "support Russia" because you think it makes for a better bumper sticker, but it is just stupid. It clearly indicates you simply do not choose to use the brain cells you have to actually participate in a conversation.
Last edited: