Yay! I have an IQ of 145, which must mean I smarter than like 95% of you! Carter must be like ridiculously smart, though.
Carter must be like ridiculously smart, though
Uh, yeah. He had a degree in nuclear engineering.
Yay! I have an IQ of 145, which must mean I smarter than like 95% of you! Carter must be like ridiculously smart, though.
Have you ever been around a life-long alcoholic Water?
Carter must be like ridiculously smart, though
Uh, yeah. He had a degree in nuclear engineering.
Remember the IQ level is relevant to age as well. What you are expected to know at your age plays a part. Your interest in politics and other events would increase your score at your age level, but it will not be a benefit when you are about 30 or so. IQ levels change throughout a lifetime.Yay! I have an IQ of 145, which must mean I smarter than like 95% of you! Carter must be like ridiculously smart, though.
OK. Thankyou for telling me that irrelevancy.
IQ tests are simply tests of the ability to carry out that particular test, intelligence is something much more fluid than that. I'm very sceptical of them, even though I usually do well.
However, if Bush has an IQ of 90, those that conduct the tests consider this to be only 10 points above borderline mental retardation.
Speaking of retardation, MENSA... Why do intelligent people require a group and badge to tell them how intelligent they are?
Umm you don't have to be a child molester to recognize child molestation, nor do you have to be a good leader to recognize a bad one."Clinton was prob higher than Bush
Carter no way"
If I were to guess based on what we have seen from the three...
1) Clinton is probably around the mid 140's
2) Bush is probably around the mid 120's
3) You are totally off on Carter. The guy was wicked smart.... He just wasnt a good leader.... which makes his criticisms of Bush's leadership rather funny.
Alcohol abuse actually doesn't do much permanent damage to the brain.
SuperSmart doesn't necessarily equate to good leadership skills, or even to good policy decisions. Often it can lead, I am not saying it did for Carter just that it can, to a belief that there is no need to listen to advice and give "cause" to ignore the "regular people" who will be your constituency."Clinton was prob higher than Bush
Carter no way"
If I were to guess based on what we have seen from the three...
1) Clinton is probably around the mid 140's
2) Bush is probably around the mid 120's
3) You are totally off on Carter. The guy was wicked smart.... He just wasnt a good leader.... which makes his criticisms of Bush's leadership rather funny.
SuperSmart doesn't necessarily equate to good leadership skills, or even to good policy decisions. Often it can, I am not saying it did for Carter just that it can, to a belief that there is no need to listen to advice and give "cause" to ignore the "regular people" who will be your constituency.
I still would love to have a face-to-face with Carter to see if he'd give insight into the UFO phenomena of which he was a strong believer and had access to some more information not easily accessible to the citizen....
Umm you don't have to be a child molester to recognize child molestation, nor do you have to be a good leader to recognize a bad one.
Uh -- yes, it does. Have you ever heard of Korsakoff's Syndrome? This is an extreme, but excessive alcohol intake can kill brain cells. Chronic excessive alcohol intake can make this a real problem because the effects will be cumulative. Brain cells do not regenerate; the conditions are not present to enable this. Korsakoff's is the extreme in eventual outcomes, other than death.
He actually saw a UFO previous to becoming President.Really? I didn't know that. That's very interesting.